Cargando…

Blinded, Double‐Dummy, Parallel‐Group, Phase 2a Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of a Highly Selective 5‐Hydroxytryptamine Type 4 Receptor Agonist in Critically Ill Patients With Enteral Feeding Intolerance

BACKGROUND: Delayed gastric emptying is the leading cause of enteral feeding intolerance (EFI) in critical illness. This phase 2a study compared TAK‐954, a selective agonist of 5‐hydroxytryptamine type 4 receptors, with metoclopramide in critically ill patients with EFI (NCT01953081). METHODS: A bli...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chapman, Marianne J., Jones, Karen L., Almansa, Cristina, Barnes, Chris N., Nguyen, Deanna, Deane, Adam M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7891369/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31990087
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jpen.1732
_version_ 1783652684034736128
author Chapman, Marianne J.
Jones, Karen L.
Almansa, Cristina
Barnes, Chris N.
Nguyen, Deanna
Deane, Adam M.
author_facet Chapman, Marianne J.
Jones, Karen L.
Almansa, Cristina
Barnes, Chris N.
Nguyen, Deanna
Deane, Adam M.
author_sort Chapman, Marianne J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Delayed gastric emptying is the leading cause of enteral feeding intolerance (EFI) in critical illness. This phase 2a study compared TAK‐954, a selective agonist of 5‐hydroxytryptamine type 4 receptors, with metoclopramide in critically ill patients with EFI (NCT01953081). METHODS: A blinded, double‐dummy trial was conducted in mechanically ventilated patients with EFI (>200 mL gastric residual volume within 24 hours before randomization). Patients were randomized to receive either 0.5 mg intravenous TAK‐954 over 1 hour then 0.9% saline injection 4 times/d (sham metoclopramide) or the active comparator 10 mg intravenous metoclopramide 4 times/d and a 1‐hour 0.9% saline infusion. After initial dosing, participants received a radiolabeled meal of liquid nutrient (Ensure; 106 kcal), and gastric emptying was measured (scintigraphy). Adverse events (AEs) were recorded from the time of consent through to day 5; serious AEs were collected to day 30. RESULTS: Thirteen patients (TAK‐954, n = 7; metoclopramide, n = 6) participated. Five patients in the TAK‐954 group and 4 in the metoclopramide group experienced AEs (2 and 3, respectively, were serious). All AEs except 1 (diarrhea in the metoclopramide group) were considered unrelated to study drug. Following treatment, a greater proportion of patients receiving TAK‐954 had normal gastric retention (<13% retention at 180 minutes) than those receiving metoclopramide (6/7 vs 3/6 patients, respectively). CONCLUSION: A single dose of 0.5 mg intravenous TAK‐954 appears to have at least similar efficacy in accelerating gastric emptying to multiple doses of 10 mg metoclopramide and was not associated with increased AEs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7891369
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78913692021-03-02 Blinded, Double‐Dummy, Parallel‐Group, Phase 2a Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of a Highly Selective 5‐Hydroxytryptamine Type 4 Receptor Agonist in Critically Ill Patients With Enteral Feeding Intolerance Chapman, Marianne J. Jones, Karen L. Almansa, Cristina Barnes, Chris N. Nguyen, Deanna Deane, Adam M. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr Original Communications BACKGROUND: Delayed gastric emptying is the leading cause of enteral feeding intolerance (EFI) in critical illness. This phase 2a study compared TAK‐954, a selective agonist of 5‐hydroxytryptamine type 4 receptors, with metoclopramide in critically ill patients with EFI (NCT01953081). METHODS: A blinded, double‐dummy trial was conducted in mechanically ventilated patients with EFI (>200 mL gastric residual volume within 24 hours before randomization). Patients were randomized to receive either 0.5 mg intravenous TAK‐954 over 1 hour then 0.9% saline injection 4 times/d (sham metoclopramide) or the active comparator 10 mg intravenous metoclopramide 4 times/d and a 1‐hour 0.9% saline infusion. After initial dosing, participants received a radiolabeled meal of liquid nutrient (Ensure; 106 kcal), and gastric emptying was measured (scintigraphy). Adverse events (AEs) were recorded from the time of consent through to day 5; serious AEs were collected to day 30. RESULTS: Thirteen patients (TAK‐954, n = 7; metoclopramide, n = 6) participated. Five patients in the TAK‐954 group and 4 in the metoclopramide group experienced AEs (2 and 3, respectively, were serious). All AEs except 1 (diarrhea in the metoclopramide group) were considered unrelated to study drug. Following treatment, a greater proportion of patients receiving TAK‐954 had normal gastric retention (<13% retention at 180 minutes) than those receiving metoclopramide (6/7 vs 3/6 patients, respectively). CONCLUSION: A single dose of 0.5 mg intravenous TAK‐954 appears to have at least similar efficacy in accelerating gastric emptying to multiple doses of 10 mg metoclopramide and was not associated with increased AEs. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-01-28 2021-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7891369/ /pubmed/31990087 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jpen.1732 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Communications
Chapman, Marianne J.
Jones, Karen L.
Almansa, Cristina
Barnes, Chris N.
Nguyen, Deanna
Deane, Adam M.
Blinded, Double‐Dummy, Parallel‐Group, Phase 2a Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of a Highly Selective 5‐Hydroxytryptamine Type 4 Receptor Agonist in Critically Ill Patients With Enteral Feeding Intolerance
title Blinded, Double‐Dummy, Parallel‐Group, Phase 2a Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of a Highly Selective 5‐Hydroxytryptamine Type 4 Receptor Agonist in Critically Ill Patients With Enteral Feeding Intolerance
title_full Blinded, Double‐Dummy, Parallel‐Group, Phase 2a Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of a Highly Selective 5‐Hydroxytryptamine Type 4 Receptor Agonist in Critically Ill Patients With Enteral Feeding Intolerance
title_fullStr Blinded, Double‐Dummy, Parallel‐Group, Phase 2a Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of a Highly Selective 5‐Hydroxytryptamine Type 4 Receptor Agonist in Critically Ill Patients With Enteral Feeding Intolerance
title_full_unstemmed Blinded, Double‐Dummy, Parallel‐Group, Phase 2a Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of a Highly Selective 5‐Hydroxytryptamine Type 4 Receptor Agonist in Critically Ill Patients With Enteral Feeding Intolerance
title_short Blinded, Double‐Dummy, Parallel‐Group, Phase 2a Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of a Highly Selective 5‐Hydroxytryptamine Type 4 Receptor Agonist in Critically Ill Patients With Enteral Feeding Intolerance
title_sort blinded, double‐dummy, parallel‐group, phase 2a randomized clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a highly selective 5‐hydroxytryptamine type 4 receptor agonist in critically ill patients with enteral feeding intolerance
topic Original Communications
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7891369/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31990087
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jpen.1732
work_keys_str_mv AT chapmanmariannej blindeddoubledummyparallelgroupphase2arandomizedclinicaltrialtoevaluatetheefficacyandsafetyofahighlyselective5hydroxytryptaminetype4receptoragonistincriticallyillpatientswithenteralfeedingintolerance
AT joneskarenl blindeddoubledummyparallelgroupphase2arandomizedclinicaltrialtoevaluatetheefficacyandsafetyofahighlyselective5hydroxytryptaminetype4receptoragonistincriticallyillpatientswithenteralfeedingintolerance
AT almansacristina blindeddoubledummyparallelgroupphase2arandomizedclinicaltrialtoevaluatetheefficacyandsafetyofahighlyselective5hydroxytryptaminetype4receptoragonistincriticallyillpatientswithenteralfeedingintolerance
AT barneschrisn blindeddoubledummyparallelgroupphase2arandomizedclinicaltrialtoevaluatetheefficacyandsafetyofahighlyselective5hydroxytryptaminetype4receptoragonistincriticallyillpatientswithenteralfeedingintolerance
AT nguyendeanna blindeddoubledummyparallelgroupphase2arandomizedclinicaltrialtoevaluatetheefficacyandsafetyofahighlyselective5hydroxytryptaminetype4receptoragonistincriticallyillpatientswithenteralfeedingintolerance
AT deaneadamm blindeddoubledummyparallelgroupphase2arandomizedclinicaltrialtoevaluatetheefficacyandsafetyofahighlyselective5hydroxytryptaminetype4receptoragonistincriticallyillpatientswithenteralfeedingintolerance