Cargando…

Prospective case‐control study of enterovirus detection differences in children’s cerebrospinal fluid between multiplex PCR and real‐time RT‐PCR assay

BACKGROUND: Viral encephalitis is common in childhood. It is an acute brain parenchymal inflammation caused by a variety of viral infection, and enterovirus accounts for the majority. Due to atypical clinical manifestations, pathogenic testing is important for assisting clinical diagnosis. The purpo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: You, Dianping, Chen, Fang, Li, Jingjie, Zeng, Xianping, Wang, Weijian, Guo, Yinghui, Yang, Fan, Sun, Suzhen, Wang, Le
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7891498/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33146929
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.23606
_version_ 1783652710877233152
author You, Dianping
Chen, Fang
Li, Jingjie
Zeng, Xianping
Wang, Weijian
Guo, Yinghui
Yang, Fan
Sun, Suzhen
Wang, Le
author_facet You, Dianping
Chen, Fang
Li, Jingjie
Zeng, Xianping
Wang, Weijian
Guo, Yinghui
Yang, Fan
Sun, Suzhen
Wang, Le
author_sort You, Dianping
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Viral encephalitis is common in childhood. It is an acute brain parenchymal inflammation caused by a variety of viral infection, and enterovirus accounts for the majority. Due to atypical clinical manifestations, pathogenic testing is important for assisting clinical diagnosis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of the multiplex PCR assay compared with quantitative real‐time PCR for enterovirus detection. METHODS: A prospective case‐control study was performed involving 103 pediatric patients suspected for viral encephalitis and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples were collected and tested for 9 pathogens using multiplex PCR assay during April to November in 2018. In parallel, an aliquot of samples was tested for enterovirus infection by real‐time PCR assay. RESULTS: There were 85.4% children were confirmed as viral encephalitis on discharge, the remaining ones were diagnosed as other CNS diseases, such as epilepsy. The specificity of the two methods was the same as that of the clinical diagnosis, but the sensitivity and consistency with clinical diagnosis of multiplex PCR were both higher than the real‐time PCR. Besides of enterovirus, multiplex PCR could also detect coinfection of enterovirus with Epstein‐Barr virus and mumps virus. CONCLUSION: Results of multiplex PCR method are more consistent with the clinical diagnosis and are superior to real‐time PCR for detecting enterovirus in CSF.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7891498
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78914982021-03-10 Prospective case‐control study of enterovirus detection differences in children’s cerebrospinal fluid between multiplex PCR and real‐time RT‐PCR assay You, Dianping Chen, Fang Li, Jingjie Zeng, Xianping Wang, Weijian Guo, Yinghui Yang, Fan Sun, Suzhen Wang, Le J Clin Lab Anal Research Articles BACKGROUND: Viral encephalitis is common in childhood. It is an acute brain parenchymal inflammation caused by a variety of viral infection, and enterovirus accounts for the majority. Due to atypical clinical manifestations, pathogenic testing is important for assisting clinical diagnosis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of the multiplex PCR assay compared with quantitative real‐time PCR for enterovirus detection. METHODS: A prospective case‐control study was performed involving 103 pediatric patients suspected for viral encephalitis and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples were collected and tested for 9 pathogens using multiplex PCR assay during April to November in 2018. In parallel, an aliquot of samples was tested for enterovirus infection by real‐time PCR assay. RESULTS: There were 85.4% children were confirmed as viral encephalitis on discharge, the remaining ones were diagnosed as other CNS diseases, such as epilepsy. The specificity of the two methods was the same as that of the clinical diagnosis, but the sensitivity and consistency with clinical diagnosis of multiplex PCR were both higher than the real‐time PCR. Besides of enterovirus, multiplex PCR could also detect coinfection of enterovirus with Epstein‐Barr virus and mumps virus. CONCLUSION: Results of multiplex PCR method are more consistent with the clinical diagnosis and are superior to real‐time PCR for detecting enterovirus in CSF. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7891498/ /pubmed/33146929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.23606 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis Published by Wiley Periodicals LLC This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
You, Dianping
Chen, Fang
Li, Jingjie
Zeng, Xianping
Wang, Weijian
Guo, Yinghui
Yang, Fan
Sun, Suzhen
Wang, Le
Prospective case‐control study of enterovirus detection differences in children’s cerebrospinal fluid between multiplex PCR and real‐time RT‐PCR assay
title Prospective case‐control study of enterovirus detection differences in children’s cerebrospinal fluid between multiplex PCR and real‐time RT‐PCR assay
title_full Prospective case‐control study of enterovirus detection differences in children’s cerebrospinal fluid between multiplex PCR and real‐time RT‐PCR assay
title_fullStr Prospective case‐control study of enterovirus detection differences in children’s cerebrospinal fluid between multiplex PCR and real‐time RT‐PCR assay
title_full_unstemmed Prospective case‐control study of enterovirus detection differences in children’s cerebrospinal fluid between multiplex PCR and real‐time RT‐PCR assay
title_short Prospective case‐control study of enterovirus detection differences in children’s cerebrospinal fluid between multiplex PCR and real‐time RT‐PCR assay
title_sort prospective case‐control study of enterovirus detection differences in children’s cerebrospinal fluid between multiplex pcr and real‐time rt‐pcr assay
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7891498/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33146929
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.23606
work_keys_str_mv AT youdianping prospectivecasecontrolstudyofenterovirusdetectiondifferencesinchildrenscerebrospinalfluidbetweenmultiplexpcrandrealtimertpcrassay
AT chenfang prospectivecasecontrolstudyofenterovirusdetectiondifferencesinchildrenscerebrospinalfluidbetweenmultiplexpcrandrealtimertpcrassay
AT lijingjie prospectivecasecontrolstudyofenterovirusdetectiondifferencesinchildrenscerebrospinalfluidbetweenmultiplexpcrandrealtimertpcrassay
AT zengxianping prospectivecasecontrolstudyofenterovirusdetectiondifferencesinchildrenscerebrospinalfluidbetweenmultiplexpcrandrealtimertpcrassay
AT wangweijian prospectivecasecontrolstudyofenterovirusdetectiondifferencesinchildrenscerebrospinalfluidbetweenmultiplexpcrandrealtimertpcrassay
AT guoyinghui prospectivecasecontrolstudyofenterovirusdetectiondifferencesinchildrenscerebrospinalfluidbetweenmultiplexpcrandrealtimertpcrassay
AT yangfan prospectivecasecontrolstudyofenterovirusdetectiondifferencesinchildrenscerebrospinalfluidbetweenmultiplexpcrandrealtimertpcrassay
AT sunsuzhen prospectivecasecontrolstudyofenterovirusdetectiondifferencesinchildrenscerebrospinalfluidbetweenmultiplexpcrandrealtimertpcrassay
AT wangle prospectivecasecontrolstudyofenterovirusdetectiondifferencesinchildrenscerebrospinalfluidbetweenmultiplexpcrandrealtimertpcrassay