Cargando…
Prospective case‐control study of enterovirus detection differences in children’s cerebrospinal fluid between multiplex PCR and real‐time RT‐PCR assay
BACKGROUND: Viral encephalitis is common in childhood. It is an acute brain parenchymal inflammation caused by a variety of viral infection, and enterovirus accounts for the majority. Due to atypical clinical manifestations, pathogenic testing is important for assisting clinical diagnosis. The purpo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7891498/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33146929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.23606 |
_version_ | 1783652710877233152 |
---|---|
author | You, Dianping Chen, Fang Li, Jingjie Zeng, Xianping Wang, Weijian Guo, Yinghui Yang, Fan Sun, Suzhen Wang, Le |
author_facet | You, Dianping Chen, Fang Li, Jingjie Zeng, Xianping Wang, Weijian Guo, Yinghui Yang, Fan Sun, Suzhen Wang, Le |
author_sort | You, Dianping |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Viral encephalitis is common in childhood. It is an acute brain parenchymal inflammation caused by a variety of viral infection, and enterovirus accounts for the majority. Due to atypical clinical manifestations, pathogenic testing is important for assisting clinical diagnosis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of the multiplex PCR assay compared with quantitative real‐time PCR for enterovirus detection. METHODS: A prospective case‐control study was performed involving 103 pediatric patients suspected for viral encephalitis and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples were collected and tested for 9 pathogens using multiplex PCR assay during April to November in 2018. In parallel, an aliquot of samples was tested for enterovirus infection by real‐time PCR assay. RESULTS: There were 85.4% children were confirmed as viral encephalitis on discharge, the remaining ones were diagnosed as other CNS diseases, such as epilepsy. The specificity of the two methods was the same as that of the clinical diagnosis, but the sensitivity and consistency with clinical diagnosis of multiplex PCR were both higher than the real‐time PCR. Besides of enterovirus, multiplex PCR could also detect coinfection of enterovirus with Epstein‐Barr virus and mumps virus. CONCLUSION: Results of multiplex PCR method are more consistent with the clinical diagnosis and are superior to real‐time PCR for detecting enterovirus in CSF. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7891498 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78914982021-03-10 Prospective case‐control study of enterovirus detection differences in children’s cerebrospinal fluid between multiplex PCR and real‐time RT‐PCR assay You, Dianping Chen, Fang Li, Jingjie Zeng, Xianping Wang, Weijian Guo, Yinghui Yang, Fan Sun, Suzhen Wang, Le J Clin Lab Anal Research Articles BACKGROUND: Viral encephalitis is common in childhood. It is an acute brain parenchymal inflammation caused by a variety of viral infection, and enterovirus accounts for the majority. Due to atypical clinical manifestations, pathogenic testing is important for assisting clinical diagnosis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of the multiplex PCR assay compared with quantitative real‐time PCR for enterovirus detection. METHODS: A prospective case‐control study was performed involving 103 pediatric patients suspected for viral encephalitis and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples were collected and tested for 9 pathogens using multiplex PCR assay during April to November in 2018. In parallel, an aliquot of samples was tested for enterovirus infection by real‐time PCR assay. RESULTS: There were 85.4% children were confirmed as viral encephalitis on discharge, the remaining ones were diagnosed as other CNS diseases, such as epilepsy. The specificity of the two methods was the same as that of the clinical diagnosis, but the sensitivity and consistency with clinical diagnosis of multiplex PCR were both higher than the real‐time PCR. Besides of enterovirus, multiplex PCR could also detect coinfection of enterovirus with Epstein‐Barr virus and mumps virus. CONCLUSION: Results of multiplex PCR method are more consistent with the clinical diagnosis and are superior to real‐time PCR for detecting enterovirus in CSF. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7891498/ /pubmed/33146929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.23606 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis Published by Wiley Periodicals LLC This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles You, Dianping Chen, Fang Li, Jingjie Zeng, Xianping Wang, Weijian Guo, Yinghui Yang, Fan Sun, Suzhen Wang, Le Prospective case‐control study of enterovirus detection differences in children’s cerebrospinal fluid between multiplex PCR and real‐time RT‐PCR assay |
title | Prospective case‐control study of enterovirus detection differences in children’s cerebrospinal fluid between multiplex PCR and real‐time RT‐PCR assay |
title_full | Prospective case‐control study of enterovirus detection differences in children’s cerebrospinal fluid between multiplex PCR and real‐time RT‐PCR assay |
title_fullStr | Prospective case‐control study of enterovirus detection differences in children’s cerebrospinal fluid between multiplex PCR and real‐time RT‐PCR assay |
title_full_unstemmed | Prospective case‐control study of enterovirus detection differences in children’s cerebrospinal fluid between multiplex PCR and real‐time RT‐PCR assay |
title_short | Prospective case‐control study of enterovirus detection differences in children’s cerebrospinal fluid between multiplex PCR and real‐time RT‐PCR assay |
title_sort | prospective case‐control study of enterovirus detection differences in children’s cerebrospinal fluid between multiplex pcr and real‐time rt‐pcr assay |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7891498/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33146929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.23606 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT youdianping prospectivecasecontrolstudyofenterovirusdetectiondifferencesinchildrenscerebrospinalfluidbetweenmultiplexpcrandrealtimertpcrassay AT chenfang prospectivecasecontrolstudyofenterovirusdetectiondifferencesinchildrenscerebrospinalfluidbetweenmultiplexpcrandrealtimertpcrassay AT lijingjie prospectivecasecontrolstudyofenterovirusdetectiondifferencesinchildrenscerebrospinalfluidbetweenmultiplexpcrandrealtimertpcrassay AT zengxianping prospectivecasecontrolstudyofenterovirusdetectiondifferencesinchildrenscerebrospinalfluidbetweenmultiplexpcrandrealtimertpcrassay AT wangweijian prospectivecasecontrolstudyofenterovirusdetectiondifferencesinchildrenscerebrospinalfluidbetweenmultiplexpcrandrealtimertpcrassay AT guoyinghui prospectivecasecontrolstudyofenterovirusdetectiondifferencesinchildrenscerebrospinalfluidbetweenmultiplexpcrandrealtimertpcrassay AT yangfan prospectivecasecontrolstudyofenterovirusdetectiondifferencesinchildrenscerebrospinalfluidbetweenmultiplexpcrandrealtimertpcrassay AT sunsuzhen prospectivecasecontrolstudyofenterovirusdetectiondifferencesinchildrenscerebrospinalfluidbetweenmultiplexpcrandrealtimertpcrassay AT wangle prospectivecasecontrolstudyofenterovirusdetectiondifferencesinchildrenscerebrospinalfluidbetweenmultiplexpcrandrealtimertpcrassay |