Cargando…

Establishment of improved review criteria for hematology analyzers in cancer hospitals

BACKGROUND: Although hematologic review criteria for general hospitals have been established, they may be insufficient for cancer hospitals. This study aimed to establish the appropriate review criteria for hematology analyzers in cancer hospitals. METHODS: A total of 1003 samples from our hospital...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Xiaoyan, Wang, Xu, Ge, Peng, Zhao, Xiaoqiang, Chen, Chong, Hu, Shusheng, Ren, Li
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7891522/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33314392
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.23638
_version_ 1783652716553175040
author Wang, Xiaoyan
Wang, Xu
Ge, Peng
Zhao, Xiaoqiang
Chen, Chong
Hu, Shusheng
Ren, Li
author_facet Wang, Xiaoyan
Wang, Xu
Ge, Peng
Zhao, Xiaoqiang
Chen, Chong
Hu, Shusheng
Ren, Li
author_sort Wang, Xiaoyan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although hematologic review criteria for general hospitals have been established, they may be insufficient for cancer hospitals. This study aimed to establish the appropriate review criteria for hematology analyzers in cancer hospitals. METHODS: A total of 1003 samples from our hospital were randomly selected for blood smear preparation and microscopic review. The review criteria of the International Consensus Group for Hematology Review (ICGH) and Chinese consensus group were used to obtain the review, true‐negative (TN), true‐positive (TP), false‐negative (FN), and false‐positive (FP) rates, as well as the triggered rules. Our review criteria were established by comparing flag or numeric value information of TP and FP samples, adjusting rules to obtain better efficiency, a low slide review rate, and an acceptable FN rate. RESULTS: Overall, 197 (19.64%) samples showed positive smear findings. Compared to the ICGH criteria, the slide review rate of the newly established criteria declined from 51.25% to 39.28%, and the TP and TN rates increased from 17.85% and 46.06% to 23.13% and 55.83%, respectively. The FN rate of the newly established criteria was 3.69%. Another set of samples used to validate the newly established criteria yielded the review, FN, and FP rates as 33.49%, 1.86%, and 25.58%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The newly established review criteria for hematology analyzers enabled the prompt identification, smear, and further verification of doubtful specimens, without a significant increase in the workload, thus improving the efficiency of the review process. This study provided data support for other cancer hospitals to establish review criteria.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7891522
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78915222021-03-10 Establishment of improved review criteria for hematology analyzers in cancer hospitals Wang, Xiaoyan Wang, Xu Ge, Peng Zhao, Xiaoqiang Chen, Chong Hu, Shusheng Ren, Li J Clin Lab Anal Research Articles BACKGROUND: Although hematologic review criteria for general hospitals have been established, they may be insufficient for cancer hospitals. This study aimed to establish the appropriate review criteria for hematology analyzers in cancer hospitals. METHODS: A total of 1003 samples from our hospital were randomly selected for blood smear preparation and microscopic review. The review criteria of the International Consensus Group for Hematology Review (ICGH) and Chinese consensus group were used to obtain the review, true‐negative (TN), true‐positive (TP), false‐negative (FN), and false‐positive (FP) rates, as well as the triggered rules. Our review criteria were established by comparing flag or numeric value information of TP and FP samples, adjusting rules to obtain better efficiency, a low slide review rate, and an acceptable FN rate. RESULTS: Overall, 197 (19.64%) samples showed positive smear findings. Compared to the ICGH criteria, the slide review rate of the newly established criteria declined from 51.25% to 39.28%, and the TP and TN rates increased from 17.85% and 46.06% to 23.13% and 55.83%, respectively. The FN rate of the newly established criteria was 3.69%. Another set of samples used to validate the newly established criteria yielded the review, FN, and FP rates as 33.49%, 1.86%, and 25.58%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The newly established review criteria for hematology analyzers enabled the prompt identification, smear, and further verification of doubtful specimens, without a significant increase in the workload, thus improving the efficiency of the review process. This study provided data support for other cancer hospitals to establish review criteria. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7891522/ /pubmed/33314392 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.23638 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis Published by Wiley Periodicals LLC This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Wang, Xiaoyan
Wang, Xu
Ge, Peng
Zhao, Xiaoqiang
Chen, Chong
Hu, Shusheng
Ren, Li
Establishment of improved review criteria for hematology analyzers in cancer hospitals
title Establishment of improved review criteria for hematology analyzers in cancer hospitals
title_full Establishment of improved review criteria for hematology analyzers in cancer hospitals
title_fullStr Establishment of improved review criteria for hematology analyzers in cancer hospitals
title_full_unstemmed Establishment of improved review criteria for hematology analyzers in cancer hospitals
title_short Establishment of improved review criteria for hematology analyzers in cancer hospitals
title_sort establishment of improved review criteria for hematology analyzers in cancer hospitals
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7891522/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33314392
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.23638
work_keys_str_mv AT wangxiaoyan establishmentofimprovedreviewcriteriaforhematologyanalyzersincancerhospitals
AT wangxu establishmentofimprovedreviewcriteriaforhematologyanalyzersincancerhospitals
AT gepeng establishmentofimprovedreviewcriteriaforhematologyanalyzersincancerhospitals
AT zhaoxiaoqiang establishmentofimprovedreviewcriteriaforhematologyanalyzersincancerhospitals
AT chenchong establishmentofimprovedreviewcriteriaforhematologyanalyzersincancerhospitals
AT hushusheng establishmentofimprovedreviewcriteriaforhematologyanalyzersincancerhospitals
AT renli establishmentofimprovedreviewcriteriaforhematologyanalyzersincancerhospitals