Cargando…
Reliability and Reproducibility of Neuromelanin‐Sensitive Imaging of the Substantia Nigra: A Comparison of Three Different Sequences
BACKGROUND: Neuromelanin‐sensitive MRI (NM‐MRI) of the substantia nigra provides a noninvasive way to acquire an indirect measure of dopamine functioning. Despite the potential of NM‐MRI as a candidate biomarker for dopaminergic pathology, studies about its reproducibility are sparse. PURPOSE: To as...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7891576/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33037730 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmri.27384 |
_version_ | 1783652727082975232 |
---|---|
author | van der Pluijm, Marieke Cassidy, Clifford Zandstra, Melissa Wallert, Elon de Bruin, Kora Booij, Jan de Haan, Lieuwe Horga, Guillermo van de Giessen, Elsmarieke |
author_facet | van der Pluijm, Marieke Cassidy, Clifford Zandstra, Melissa Wallert, Elon de Bruin, Kora Booij, Jan de Haan, Lieuwe Horga, Guillermo van de Giessen, Elsmarieke |
author_sort | van der Pluijm, Marieke |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Neuromelanin‐sensitive MRI (NM‐MRI) of the substantia nigra provides a noninvasive way to acquire an indirect measure of dopamine functioning. Despite the potential of NM‐MRI as a candidate biomarker for dopaminergic pathology, studies about its reproducibility are sparse. PURPOSE: To assess the test–retest reproducibility of three commonly used NM‐MRI sequences and evaluate three analysis methods. STUDY TYPE: Prospective study. POPULATION: A total of 11 healthy participants age between 20–27 years. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3.0T; NM‐MRI gradient recalled echo (GRE) with magnetization transfer (MT) pulse; NM‐MRI turbo spin echo (TSE) with MT pulse; NM‐MRI TSE without MT pulse. ASSESSMENT: Participants were scanned twice with a 3‐week interval. Manual analysis, threshold analysis, and voxelwise analysis were performed for volume and contrast ratio (CR) measurements. STATISTICAL TESTS: Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated for test–retest and inter‐ and intrarater variability. RESULTS: The GRE sequence achieved the highest contrast and lowest variability (4.9–5.7%) and showed substantial to almost perfect test–retest ICC (0.72–0.90) for CR measurements. For volume measurements, the manual analysis showed a higher variability (10.7–17.9%) and scored lower test–retest ICCs (–0.13–0.73) than the other analysis methods. The threshold analysis showed higher test–retest ICC (0.77) than the manual analysis for the volume measurements. DATA CONCLUSION: NM‐MRI is a highly reproducible measure, especially when using the GRE sequence and CR measurements. Volume measurements appear to be more sensitive to inter/intrarater variability and variability in placement and orientation of the NM‐MRI slab. The threshold analysis appears to be the best alternative for volume analysis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 1 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7891576 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78915762021-03-02 Reliability and Reproducibility of Neuromelanin‐Sensitive Imaging of the Substantia Nigra: A Comparison of Three Different Sequences van der Pluijm, Marieke Cassidy, Clifford Zandstra, Melissa Wallert, Elon de Bruin, Kora Booij, Jan de Haan, Lieuwe Horga, Guillermo van de Giessen, Elsmarieke J Magn Reson Imaging Original Research BACKGROUND: Neuromelanin‐sensitive MRI (NM‐MRI) of the substantia nigra provides a noninvasive way to acquire an indirect measure of dopamine functioning. Despite the potential of NM‐MRI as a candidate biomarker for dopaminergic pathology, studies about its reproducibility are sparse. PURPOSE: To assess the test–retest reproducibility of three commonly used NM‐MRI sequences and evaluate three analysis methods. STUDY TYPE: Prospective study. POPULATION: A total of 11 healthy participants age between 20–27 years. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3.0T; NM‐MRI gradient recalled echo (GRE) with magnetization transfer (MT) pulse; NM‐MRI turbo spin echo (TSE) with MT pulse; NM‐MRI TSE without MT pulse. ASSESSMENT: Participants were scanned twice with a 3‐week interval. Manual analysis, threshold analysis, and voxelwise analysis were performed for volume and contrast ratio (CR) measurements. STATISTICAL TESTS: Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated for test–retest and inter‐ and intrarater variability. RESULTS: The GRE sequence achieved the highest contrast and lowest variability (4.9–5.7%) and showed substantial to almost perfect test–retest ICC (0.72–0.90) for CR measurements. For volume measurements, the manual analysis showed a higher variability (10.7–17.9%) and scored lower test–retest ICCs (–0.13–0.73) than the other analysis methods. The threshold analysis showed higher test–retest ICC (0.77) than the manual analysis for the volume measurements. DATA CONCLUSION: NM‐MRI is a highly reproducible measure, especially when using the GRE sequence and CR measurements. Volume measurements appear to be more sensitive to inter/intrarater variability and variability in placement and orientation of the NM‐MRI slab. The threshold analysis appears to be the best alternative for volume analysis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 1 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020-10-09 2021-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7891576/ /pubmed/33037730 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmri.27384 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Original Research van der Pluijm, Marieke Cassidy, Clifford Zandstra, Melissa Wallert, Elon de Bruin, Kora Booij, Jan de Haan, Lieuwe Horga, Guillermo van de Giessen, Elsmarieke Reliability and Reproducibility of Neuromelanin‐Sensitive Imaging of the Substantia Nigra: A Comparison of Three Different Sequences |
title | Reliability and Reproducibility of Neuromelanin‐Sensitive Imaging of the Substantia Nigra: A Comparison of Three Different Sequences |
title_full | Reliability and Reproducibility of Neuromelanin‐Sensitive Imaging of the Substantia Nigra: A Comparison of Three Different Sequences |
title_fullStr | Reliability and Reproducibility of Neuromelanin‐Sensitive Imaging of the Substantia Nigra: A Comparison of Three Different Sequences |
title_full_unstemmed | Reliability and Reproducibility of Neuromelanin‐Sensitive Imaging of the Substantia Nigra: A Comparison of Three Different Sequences |
title_short | Reliability and Reproducibility of Neuromelanin‐Sensitive Imaging of the Substantia Nigra: A Comparison of Three Different Sequences |
title_sort | reliability and reproducibility of neuromelanin‐sensitive imaging of the substantia nigra: a comparison of three different sequences |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7891576/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33037730 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmri.27384 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanderpluijmmarieke reliabilityandreproducibilityofneuromelaninsensitiveimagingofthesubstantianigraacomparisonofthreedifferentsequences AT cassidyclifford reliabilityandreproducibilityofneuromelaninsensitiveimagingofthesubstantianigraacomparisonofthreedifferentsequences AT zandstramelissa reliabilityandreproducibilityofneuromelaninsensitiveimagingofthesubstantianigraacomparisonofthreedifferentsequences AT wallertelon reliabilityandreproducibilityofneuromelaninsensitiveimagingofthesubstantianigraacomparisonofthreedifferentsequences AT debruinkora reliabilityandreproducibilityofneuromelaninsensitiveimagingofthesubstantianigraacomparisonofthreedifferentsequences AT booijjan reliabilityandreproducibilityofneuromelaninsensitiveimagingofthesubstantianigraacomparisonofthreedifferentsequences AT dehaanlieuwe reliabilityandreproducibilityofneuromelaninsensitiveimagingofthesubstantianigraacomparisonofthreedifferentsequences AT horgaguillermo reliabilityandreproducibilityofneuromelaninsensitiveimagingofthesubstantianigraacomparisonofthreedifferentsequences AT vandegiessenelsmarieke reliabilityandreproducibilityofneuromelaninsensitiveimagingofthesubstantianigraacomparisonofthreedifferentsequences |