Cargando…

Multiparametric Renal MRI: An Intrasubject Test–Retest Repeatability Study

BACKGROUND: Renal multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a promising tool for diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment monitoring in kidney disease. PURPOSE: To determine intrasubject test–retest repeatability of renal MRI measurements. STUDY TYPE: Prospective. POPULATION: Nineteen healthy s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Boer, Anneloes, Harteveld, Anita A., Stemkens, Bjorn, Blankestijn, Peter J., Bos, Clemens, Franklin, Suzanne L., Froeling, Martijn, Joles, Jaap A., Verhaar, Marianne C., van den Berg, Nico, Hoogduin, Hans, Leiner, Tim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7891585/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32297700
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmri.27167
_version_ 1783652729159155712
author de Boer, Anneloes
Harteveld, Anita A.
Stemkens, Bjorn
Blankestijn, Peter J.
Bos, Clemens
Franklin, Suzanne L.
Froeling, Martijn
Joles, Jaap A.
Verhaar, Marianne C.
van den Berg, Nico
Hoogduin, Hans
Leiner, Tim
author_facet de Boer, Anneloes
Harteveld, Anita A.
Stemkens, Bjorn
Blankestijn, Peter J.
Bos, Clemens
Franklin, Suzanne L.
Froeling, Martijn
Joles, Jaap A.
Verhaar, Marianne C.
van den Berg, Nico
Hoogduin, Hans
Leiner, Tim
author_sort de Boer, Anneloes
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Renal multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a promising tool for diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment monitoring in kidney disease. PURPOSE: To determine intrasubject test–retest repeatability of renal MRI measurements. STUDY TYPE: Prospective. POPULATION: Nineteen healthy subjects aged over 40 years. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCES: T(1) and T(2) mapping, R(2)* mapping or blood oxygenation level‐dependent (BOLD) MRI, diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), and intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI), 2D phase contrast, arterial spin labelling (ASL), dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI, and quantitative Dixon for fat quantification at 3T. ASSESSMENT: Subjects were scanned twice with ~1 week between visits. Total scan time was ~1 hour. Postprocessing included motion correction, semiautomated segmentation of cortex and medulla, and fitting of the appropriate signal model. STATISTICAL TEST: To assess the repeatability, a Bland–Altman analysis was performed and coefficients of variation (CoVs), repeatability coefficients, and intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated. RESULTS: CoVs for relaxometry (T(1), T(2), R(2)*/BOLD) were below 6.1%, with the lowest CoVs for T(2) maps and highest for R(2)*/BOLD. CoVs for all diffusion analyses were below 7.2%, except for perfusion fraction (F(P)), with CoVs ranging from 18–24%. The CoV for renal sinus fat volume and percentage were both around 9%. Perfusion measurements were most repeatable with ASL (cortical perfusion only) and 2D phase contrast with CoVs of 10% and 13%, respectively. DCE perfusion had a CoV of 16%, while single kidney glomerular filtration rate (GFR) had a CoV of 13%. Repeatability coefficients (RCs) ranged from 7.7–87% (lowest/highest values for medullary mean diffusivity and cortical F(P), respectively) and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) ranged from −0.01 to 0.98 (lowest/highest values for cortical F(P) and renal sinus fat volume, respectively). DATA CONCLUSION: CoVs of most MRI measures of renal function and structure (with the exception of F(P) and perfusion as measured by DCE) were below 13%, which is comparable to standard clinical tests in nephrology. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 1
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7891585
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78915852021-03-02 Multiparametric Renal MRI: An Intrasubject Test–Retest Repeatability Study de Boer, Anneloes Harteveld, Anita A. Stemkens, Bjorn Blankestijn, Peter J. Bos, Clemens Franklin, Suzanne L. Froeling, Martijn Joles, Jaap A. Verhaar, Marianne C. van den Berg, Nico Hoogduin, Hans Leiner, Tim J Magn Reson Imaging Original Research BACKGROUND: Renal multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a promising tool for diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment monitoring in kidney disease. PURPOSE: To determine intrasubject test–retest repeatability of renal MRI measurements. STUDY TYPE: Prospective. POPULATION: Nineteen healthy subjects aged over 40 years. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCES: T(1) and T(2) mapping, R(2)* mapping or blood oxygenation level‐dependent (BOLD) MRI, diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), and intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI), 2D phase contrast, arterial spin labelling (ASL), dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI, and quantitative Dixon for fat quantification at 3T. ASSESSMENT: Subjects were scanned twice with ~1 week between visits. Total scan time was ~1 hour. Postprocessing included motion correction, semiautomated segmentation of cortex and medulla, and fitting of the appropriate signal model. STATISTICAL TEST: To assess the repeatability, a Bland–Altman analysis was performed and coefficients of variation (CoVs), repeatability coefficients, and intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated. RESULTS: CoVs for relaxometry (T(1), T(2), R(2)*/BOLD) were below 6.1%, with the lowest CoVs for T(2) maps and highest for R(2)*/BOLD. CoVs for all diffusion analyses were below 7.2%, except for perfusion fraction (F(P)), with CoVs ranging from 18–24%. The CoV for renal sinus fat volume and percentage were both around 9%. Perfusion measurements were most repeatable with ASL (cortical perfusion only) and 2D phase contrast with CoVs of 10% and 13%, respectively. DCE perfusion had a CoV of 16%, while single kidney glomerular filtration rate (GFR) had a CoV of 13%. Repeatability coefficients (RCs) ranged from 7.7–87% (lowest/highest values for medullary mean diffusivity and cortical F(P), respectively) and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) ranged from −0.01 to 0.98 (lowest/highest values for cortical F(P) and renal sinus fat volume, respectively). DATA CONCLUSION: CoVs of most MRI measures of renal function and structure (with the exception of F(P) and perfusion as measured by DCE) were below 13%, which is comparable to standard clinical tests in nephrology. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 1 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020-04-16 2021-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7891585/ /pubmed/32297700 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmri.27167 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Research
de Boer, Anneloes
Harteveld, Anita A.
Stemkens, Bjorn
Blankestijn, Peter J.
Bos, Clemens
Franklin, Suzanne L.
Froeling, Martijn
Joles, Jaap A.
Verhaar, Marianne C.
van den Berg, Nico
Hoogduin, Hans
Leiner, Tim
Multiparametric Renal MRI: An Intrasubject Test–Retest Repeatability Study
title Multiparametric Renal MRI: An Intrasubject Test–Retest Repeatability Study
title_full Multiparametric Renal MRI: An Intrasubject Test–Retest Repeatability Study
title_fullStr Multiparametric Renal MRI: An Intrasubject Test–Retest Repeatability Study
title_full_unstemmed Multiparametric Renal MRI: An Intrasubject Test–Retest Repeatability Study
title_short Multiparametric Renal MRI: An Intrasubject Test–Retest Repeatability Study
title_sort multiparametric renal mri: an intrasubject test–retest repeatability study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7891585/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32297700
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmri.27167
work_keys_str_mv AT deboeranneloes multiparametricrenalmrianintrasubjecttestretestrepeatabilitystudy
AT harteveldanitaa multiparametricrenalmrianintrasubjecttestretestrepeatabilitystudy
AT stemkensbjorn multiparametricrenalmrianintrasubjecttestretestrepeatabilitystudy
AT blankestijnpeterj multiparametricrenalmrianintrasubjecttestretestrepeatabilitystudy
AT bosclemens multiparametricrenalmrianintrasubjecttestretestrepeatabilitystudy
AT franklinsuzannel multiparametricrenalmrianintrasubjecttestretestrepeatabilitystudy
AT froelingmartijn multiparametricrenalmrianintrasubjecttestretestrepeatabilitystudy
AT jolesjaapa multiparametricrenalmrianintrasubjecttestretestrepeatabilitystudy
AT verhaarmariannec multiparametricrenalmrianintrasubjecttestretestrepeatabilitystudy
AT vandenbergnico multiparametricrenalmrianintrasubjecttestretestrepeatabilitystudy
AT hoogduinhans multiparametricrenalmrianintrasubjecttestretestrepeatabilitystudy
AT leinertim multiparametricrenalmrianintrasubjecttestretestrepeatabilitystudy