Cargando…
Multiparametric Renal MRI: An Intrasubject Test–Retest Repeatability Study
BACKGROUND: Renal multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a promising tool for diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment monitoring in kidney disease. PURPOSE: To determine intrasubject test–retest repeatability of renal MRI measurements. STUDY TYPE: Prospective. POPULATION: Nineteen healthy s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7891585/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32297700 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmri.27167 |
_version_ | 1783652729159155712 |
---|---|
author | de Boer, Anneloes Harteveld, Anita A. Stemkens, Bjorn Blankestijn, Peter J. Bos, Clemens Franklin, Suzanne L. Froeling, Martijn Joles, Jaap A. Verhaar, Marianne C. van den Berg, Nico Hoogduin, Hans Leiner, Tim |
author_facet | de Boer, Anneloes Harteveld, Anita A. Stemkens, Bjorn Blankestijn, Peter J. Bos, Clemens Franklin, Suzanne L. Froeling, Martijn Joles, Jaap A. Verhaar, Marianne C. van den Berg, Nico Hoogduin, Hans Leiner, Tim |
author_sort | de Boer, Anneloes |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Renal multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a promising tool for diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment monitoring in kidney disease. PURPOSE: To determine intrasubject test–retest repeatability of renal MRI measurements. STUDY TYPE: Prospective. POPULATION: Nineteen healthy subjects aged over 40 years. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCES: T(1) and T(2) mapping, R(2)* mapping or blood oxygenation level‐dependent (BOLD) MRI, diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), and intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI), 2D phase contrast, arterial spin labelling (ASL), dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI, and quantitative Dixon for fat quantification at 3T. ASSESSMENT: Subjects were scanned twice with ~1 week between visits. Total scan time was ~1 hour. Postprocessing included motion correction, semiautomated segmentation of cortex and medulla, and fitting of the appropriate signal model. STATISTICAL TEST: To assess the repeatability, a Bland–Altman analysis was performed and coefficients of variation (CoVs), repeatability coefficients, and intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated. RESULTS: CoVs for relaxometry (T(1), T(2), R(2)*/BOLD) were below 6.1%, with the lowest CoVs for T(2) maps and highest for R(2)*/BOLD. CoVs for all diffusion analyses were below 7.2%, except for perfusion fraction (F(P)), with CoVs ranging from 18–24%. The CoV for renal sinus fat volume and percentage were both around 9%. Perfusion measurements were most repeatable with ASL (cortical perfusion only) and 2D phase contrast with CoVs of 10% and 13%, respectively. DCE perfusion had a CoV of 16%, while single kidney glomerular filtration rate (GFR) had a CoV of 13%. Repeatability coefficients (RCs) ranged from 7.7–87% (lowest/highest values for medullary mean diffusivity and cortical F(P), respectively) and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) ranged from −0.01 to 0.98 (lowest/highest values for cortical F(P) and renal sinus fat volume, respectively). DATA CONCLUSION: CoVs of most MRI measures of renal function and structure (with the exception of F(P) and perfusion as measured by DCE) were below 13%, which is comparable to standard clinical tests in nephrology. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 1 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7891585 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78915852021-03-02 Multiparametric Renal MRI: An Intrasubject Test–Retest Repeatability Study de Boer, Anneloes Harteveld, Anita A. Stemkens, Bjorn Blankestijn, Peter J. Bos, Clemens Franklin, Suzanne L. Froeling, Martijn Joles, Jaap A. Verhaar, Marianne C. van den Berg, Nico Hoogduin, Hans Leiner, Tim J Magn Reson Imaging Original Research BACKGROUND: Renal multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a promising tool for diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment monitoring in kidney disease. PURPOSE: To determine intrasubject test–retest repeatability of renal MRI measurements. STUDY TYPE: Prospective. POPULATION: Nineteen healthy subjects aged over 40 years. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCES: T(1) and T(2) mapping, R(2)* mapping or blood oxygenation level‐dependent (BOLD) MRI, diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), and intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI), 2D phase contrast, arterial spin labelling (ASL), dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI, and quantitative Dixon for fat quantification at 3T. ASSESSMENT: Subjects were scanned twice with ~1 week between visits. Total scan time was ~1 hour. Postprocessing included motion correction, semiautomated segmentation of cortex and medulla, and fitting of the appropriate signal model. STATISTICAL TEST: To assess the repeatability, a Bland–Altman analysis was performed and coefficients of variation (CoVs), repeatability coefficients, and intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated. RESULTS: CoVs for relaxometry (T(1), T(2), R(2)*/BOLD) were below 6.1%, with the lowest CoVs for T(2) maps and highest for R(2)*/BOLD. CoVs for all diffusion analyses were below 7.2%, except for perfusion fraction (F(P)), with CoVs ranging from 18–24%. The CoV for renal sinus fat volume and percentage were both around 9%. Perfusion measurements were most repeatable with ASL (cortical perfusion only) and 2D phase contrast with CoVs of 10% and 13%, respectively. DCE perfusion had a CoV of 16%, while single kidney glomerular filtration rate (GFR) had a CoV of 13%. Repeatability coefficients (RCs) ranged from 7.7–87% (lowest/highest values for medullary mean diffusivity and cortical F(P), respectively) and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) ranged from −0.01 to 0.98 (lowest/highest values for cortical F(P) and renal sinus fat volume, respectively). DATA CONCLUSION: CoVs of most MRI measures of renal function and structure (with the exception of F(P) and perfusion as measured by DCE) were below 13%, which is comparable to standard clinical tests in nephrology. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 1 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020-04-16 2021-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7891585/ /pubmed/32297700 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmri.27167 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Original Research de Boer, Anneloes Harteveld, Anita A. Stemkens, Bjorn Blankestijn, Peter J. Bos, Clemens Franklin, Suzanne L. Froeling, Martijn Joles, Jaap A. Verhaar, Marianne C. van den Berg, Nico Hoogduin, Hans Leiner, Tim Multiparametric Renal MRI: An Intrasubject Test–Retest Repeatability Study |
title | Multiparametric Renal MRI: An Intrasubject Test–Retest Repeatability Study |
title_full | Multiparametric Renal MRI: An Intrasubject Test–Retest Repeatability Study |
title_fullStr | Multiparametric Renal MRI: An Intrasubject Test–Retest Repeatability Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Multiparametric Renal MRI: An Intrasubject Test–Retest Repeatability Study |
title_short | Multiparametric Renal MRI: An Intrasubject Test–Retest Repeatability Study |
title_sort | multiparametric renal mri: an intrasubject test–retest repeatability study |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7891585/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32297700 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmri.27167 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT deboeranneloes multiparametricrenalmrianintrasubjecttestretestrepeatabilitystudy AT harteveldanitaa multiparametricrenalmrianintrasubjecttestretestrepeatabilitystudy AT stemkensbjorn multiparametricrenalmrianintrasubjecttestretestrepeatabilitystudy AT blankestijnpeterj multiparametricrenalmrianintrasubjecttestretestrepeatabilitystudy AT bosclemens multiparametricrenalmrianintrasubjecttestretestrepeatabilitystudy AT franklinsuzannel multiparametricrenalmrianintrasubjecttestretestrepeatabilitystudy AT froelingmartijn multiparametricrenalmrianintrasubjecttestretestrepeatabilitystudy AT jolesjaapa multiparametricrenalmrianintrasubjecttestretestrepeatabilitystudy AT verhaarmariannec multiparametricrenalmrianintrasubjecttestretestrepeatabilitystudy AT vandenbergnico multiparametricrenalmrianintrasubjecttestretestrepeatabilitystudy AT hoogduinhans multiparametricrenalmrianintrasubjecttestretestrepeatabilitystudy AT leinertim multiparametricrenalmrianintrasubjecttestretestrepeatabilitystudy |