Cargando…

“Reading the Mind in the Eyes” in Autistic Adults is Modulated by Valence and Difficulty: An InFoR Study

Autism spectrum disorders (ASD) are heterogeneous and complex neurodevelopmental conditions that urgently need reliable and sensitive measures to inform diagnosis properly. The Reading the Mind in the Eyes Task (or Eyes Test from now on) is widely used for this purpose. A recent study showed that su...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baltazar, Matias, Geoffray, Marie‐Maude, Chatham, Christopher, Bouvard, Manuel, Martinez Teruel, Axelle, Monnet, David, Scheid, Isabelle, Murzi, Eleonora, Couffin‐Cadiergues, Sandrine, Umbricht, Daniel, Murtagh, Lorraine, Delorme, Richard, Ly Le‐Moal, Myriam, Leboyer, Marion, Amestoy, Anouck
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7891586/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32929870
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aur.2390
_version_ 1783652729394036736
author Baltazar, Matias
Geoffray, Marie‐Maude
Chatham, Christopher
Bouvard, Manuel
Martinez Teruel, Axelle
Monnet, David
Scheid, Isabelle
Murzi, Eleonora
Couffin‐Cadiergues, Sandrine
Umbricht, Daniel
Murtagh, Lorraine
Delorme, Richard
Ly Le‐Moal, Myriam
Leboyer, Marion
Amestoy, Anouck
author_facet Baltazar, Matias
Geoffray, Marie‐Maude
Chatham, Christopher
Bouvard, Manuel
Martinez Teruel, Axelle
Monnet, David
Scheid, Isabelle
Murzi, Eleonora
Couffin‐Cadiergues, Sandrine
Umbricht, Daniel
Murtagh, Lorraine
Delorme, Richard
Ly Le‐Moal, Myriam
Leboyer, Marion
Amestoy, Anouck
author_sort Baltazar, Matias
collection PubMed
description Autism spectrum disorders (ASD) are heterogeneous and complex neurodevelopmental conditions that urgently need reliable and sensitive measures to inform diagnosis properly. The Reading the Mind in the Eyes Task (or Eyes Test from now on) is widely used for this purpose. A recent study showed that subcategories of items of the children version of the Eyes Test could be especially discriminative to distinguish ASD and control children. Here, we analyzed the performance on the Eyes Test of 30 high functioning (IQ > 70) adults with ASD and 29 controls from the InFoR cohort multicentric study, using a Generalized Linear Mixed Model. We found that valence and difficulty modulate the performance on the Eyes Test, with easy and positive items being the most discriminative to distinguish ASD and controls. In particular, we suggest this result might be actionable to discriminate ASD patients from controls in subgroups where their overall scores show less difference with controls. We propose for future research the computation of two additional indexes when using the Eyes Test: the first focusing on the easy and positive items (applying a threshold of 70% of correct responses for these items, above which people are at very low risk of having ASD) and the second focusing on the performance gain from difficult to easy items (with a progression of less than 15% showing high risk of having ASD). Our findings open the possibility for a major change in how the Eyes Test is used to inform diagnosis in ASD. LAY SUMMARY: The Eyes Test is used worldwide to inform autism spectrum disorders (ASD) diagnosis. We show here that ASD and neurotypical adults show the most difference in performance on subgroups of items: ASD adults do not improve as expected when comparing easy and difficult items, and they do not show an improvement for items displaying a positive feeling. We advise clinicians to focus on these comparisons to increase the property of the test to distinguish people with ASD from neurotypical adults.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7891586
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78915862021-03-02 “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” in Autistic Adults is Modulated by Valence and Difficulty: An InFoR Study Baltazar, Matias Geoffray, Marie‐Maude Chatham, Christopher Bouvard, Manuel Martinez Teruel, Axelle Monnet, David Scheid, Isabelle Murzi, Eleonora Couffin‐Cadiergues, Sandrine Umbricht, Daniel Murtagh, Lorraine Delorme, Richard Ly Le‐Moal, Myriam Leboyer, Marion Amestoy, Anouck Autism Res PSYCHOLOGY Autism spectrum disorders (ASD) are heterogeneous and complex neurodevelopmental conditions that urgently need reliable and sensitive measures to inform diagnosis properly. The Reading the Mind in the Eyes Task (or Eyes Test from now on) is widely used for this purpose. A recent study showed that subcategories of items of the children version of the Eyes Test could be especially discriminative to distinguish ASD and control children. Here, we analyzed the performance on the Eyes Test of 30 high functioning (IQ > 70) adults with ASD and 29 controls from the InFoR cohort multicentric study, using a Generalized Linear Mixed Model. We found that valence and difficulty modulate the performance on the Eyes Test, with easy and positive items being the most discriminative to distinguish ASD and controls. In particular, we suggest this result might be actionable to discriminate ASD patients from controls in subgroups where their overall scores show less difference with controls. We propose for future research the computation of two additional indexes when using the Eyes Test: the first focusing on the easy and positive items (applying a threshold of 70% of correct responses for these items, above which people are at very low risk of having ASD) and the second focusing on the performance gain from difficult to easy items (with a progression of less than 15% showing high risk of having ASD). Our findings open the possibility for a major change in how the Eyes Test is used to inform diagnosis in ASD. LAY SUMMARY: The Eyes Test is used worldwide to inform autism spectrum disorders (ASD) diagnosis. We show here that ASD and neurotypical adults show the most difference in performance on subgroups of items: ASD adults do not improve as expected when comparing easy and difficult items, and they do not show an improvement for items displaying a positive feeling. We advise clinicians to focus on these comparisons to increase the property of the test to distinguish people with ASD from neurotypical adults. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020-09-15 2021-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7891586/ /pubmed/32929870 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aur.2390 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Autism Research published by International Society for Autism Research and Wiley Periodicals LLC. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle PSYCHOLOGY
Baltazar, Matias
Geoffray, Marie‐Maude
Chatham, Christopher
Bouvard, Manuel
Martinez Teruel, Axelle
Monnet, David
Scheid, Isabelle
Murzi, Eleonora
Couffin‐Cadiergues, Sandrine
Umbricht, Daniel
Murtagh, Lorraine
Delorme, Richard
Ly Le‐Moal, Myriam
Leboyer, Marion
Amestoy, Anouck
“Reading the Mind in the Eyes” in Autistic Adults is Modulated by Valence and Difficulty: An InFoR Study
title “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” in Autistic Adults is Modulated by Valence and Difficulty: An InFoR Study
title_full “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” in Autistic Adults is Modulated by Valence and Difficulty: An InFoR Study
title_fullStr “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” in Autistic Adults is Modulated by Valence and Difficulty: An InFoR Study
title_full_unstemmed “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” in Autistic Adults is Modulated by Valence and Difficulty: An InFoR Study
title_short “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” in Autistic Adults is Modulated by Valence and Difficulty: An InFoR Study
title_sort “reading the mind in the eyes” in autistic adults is modulated by valence and difficulty: an infor study
topic PSYCHOLOGY
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7891586/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32929870
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aur.2390
work_keys_str_mv AT baltazarmatias readingthemindintheeyesinautisticadultsismodulatedbyvalenceanddifficultyaninforstudy
AT geoffraymariemaude readingthemindintheeyesinautisticadultsismodulatedbyvalenceanddifficultyaninforstudy
AT chathamchristopher readingthemindintheeyesinautisticadultsismodulatedbyvalenceanddifficultyaninforstudy
AT bouvardmanuel readingthemindintheeyesinautisticadultsismodulatedbyvalenceanddifficultyaninforstudy
AT martinezteruelaxelle readingthemindintheeyesinautisticadultsismodulatedbyvalenceanddifficultyaninforstudy
AT monnetdavid readingthemindintheeyesinautisticadultsismodulatedbyvalenceanddifficultyaninforstudy
AT scheidisabelle readingthemindintheeyesinautisticadultsismodulatedbyvalenceanddifficultyaninforstudy
AT murzieleonora readingthemindintheeyesinautisticadultsismodulatedbyvalenceanddifficultyaninforstudy
AT couffincadierguessandrine readingthemindintheeyesinautisticadultsismodulatedbyvalenceanddifficultyaninforstudy
AT umbrichtdaniel readingthemindintheeyesinautisticadultsismodulatedbyvalenceanddifficultyaninforstudy
AT murtaghlorraine readingthemindintheeyesinautisticadultsismodulatedbyvalenceanddifficultyaninforstudy
AT delormerichard readingthemindintheeyesinautisticadultsismodulatedbyvalenceanddifficultyaninforstudy
AT lylemoalmyriam readingthemindintheeyesinautisticadultsismodulatedbyvalenceanddifficultyaninforstudy
AT leboyermarion readingthemindintheeyesinautisticadultsismodulatedbyvalenceanddifficultyaninforstudy
AT amestoyanouck readingthemindintheeyesinautisticadultsismodulatedbyvalenceanddifficultyaninforstudy