Cargando…
Accuracy of postpartum hemorrhage coding in the Swedish Pregnancy Register
INTRODUCTION: Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is recognized as a leading cause of obstetric morbidity and mortality. Population‐wide studies have used International Classification of Diseases (ICD) diagnostic codes to track and report the prevalence of PPH. Although the 10th revision (ICD‐10) was introd...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7891624/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32956490 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13994 |
_version_ | 1783652738132869120 |
---|---|
author | Ladfors, Linnea V. Muraca, Giulia M. Butwick, Alexander Edgren, Gustaf Stephansson, Olof |
author_facet | Ladfors, Linnea V. Muraca, Giulia M. Butwick, Alexander Edgren, Gustaf Stephansson, Olof |
author_sort | Ladfors, Linnea V. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is recognized as a leading cause of obstetric morbidity and mortality. Population‐wide studies have used International Classification of Diseases (ICD) diagnostic codes to track and report the prevalence of PPH. Although the 10th revision (ICD‐10) was introduced in Sweden in 1997, the accuracy of ICD‐10 codes for PPH is not known. Thus, the aim was to determine the accuracy of diagnostic coding for PPH in the Swedish Pregnancy Register. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 609 807 deliveries in Sweden between 2014 and 2019. Information on ICD‐10 codes for PPH and estimated blood loss were extracted from the Swedish Pregnancy Register. Using an estimated blood loss >1000 mL as the reference standard, we evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of ICD‐10 codes for PPH by estimating sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value with exact binomial 95% confidence intervals (CIs). In our secondary analysis, we assessed the ICD‐10 coding accuracy for severe PPH, defined as an estimated blood loss >1000 mL and transfusion of at least 1 unit of red blood cells registered in the Scandinavian Donations and Transfusion database. RESULTS: Of the 609 807 deliveries, 43 312 (7.1%) had an ICD‐10 code for PPH and 45 071 (7.4%) had an estimated blood loss >1000 mL. The ICD codes had a sensitivity of 88.5% (95% CI 88.2‐88.7), specificity of 99.4% (95% CI 99.4‐99.4), positive predictive value of 92.0% (95% CI 91.8‐92.3) and negative predictive value of 99.1% (95% CI 99.1‐99.1). In our secondary analysis, on deliveries with severe PPH, the sensitivity for an ICD code was 91.3% (95% CI 90.7‐91.9), whereas specificity was 83.5% (95% CI 82.3‐84.6). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that ICD‐10 codes for PPH in Sweden have moderately high sensitivity and excellent specificity. These results suggest that PPH diagnostic codes in medical records and linked pregnancy and birth registers can be used for research, quality improvement and reporting PPH prevalence in Sweden. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7891624 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78916242021-03-02 Accuracy of postpartum hemorrhage coding in the Swedish Pregnancy Register Ladfors, Linnea V. Muraca, Giulia M. Butwick, Alexander Edgren, Gustaf Stephansson, Olof Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Epidemiology INTRODUCTION: Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is recognized as a leading cause of obstetric morbidity and mortality. Population‐wide studies have used International Classification of Diseases (ICD) diagnostic codes to track and report the prevalence of PPH. Although the 10th revision (ICD‐10) was introduced in Sweden in 1997, the accuracy of ICD‐10 codes for PPH is not known. Thus, the aim was to determine the accuracy of diagnostic coding for PPH in the Swedish Pregnancy Register. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 609 807 deliveries in Sweden between 2014 and 2019. Information on ICD‐10 codes for PPH and estimated blood loss were extracted from the Swedish Pregnancy Register. Using an estimated blood loss >1000 mL as the reference standard, we evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of ICD‐10 codes for PPH by estimating sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value with exact binomial 95% confidence intervals (CIs). In our secondary analysis, we assessed the ICD‐10 coding accuracy for severe PPH, defined as an estimated blood loss >1000 mL and transfusion of at least 1 unit of red blood cells registered in the Scandinavian Donations and Transfusion database. RESULTS: Of the 609 807 deliveries, 43 312 (7.1%) had an ICD‐10 code for PPH and 45 071 (7.4%) had an estimated blood loss >1000 mL. The ICD codes had a sensitivity of 88.5% (95% CI 88.2‐88.7), specificity of 99.4% (95% CI 99.4‐99.4), positive predictive value of 92.0% (95% CI 91.8‐92.3) and negative predictive value of 99.1% (95% CI 99.1‐99.1). In our secondary analysis, on deliveries with severe PPH, the sensitivity for an ICD code was 91.3% (95% CI 90.7‐91.9), whereas specificity was 83.5% (95% CI 82.3‐84.6). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that ICD‐10 codes for PPH in Sweden have moderately high sensitivity and excellent specificity. These results suggest that PPH diagnostic codes in medical records and linked pregnancy and birth registers can be used for research, quality improvement and reporting PPH prevalence in Sweden. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-10-04 2021-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7891624/ /pubmed/32956490 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13994 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology (NFOG) This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Epidemiology Ladfors, Linnea V. Muraca, Giulia M. Butwick, Alexander Edgren, Gustaf Stephansson, Olof Accuracy of postpartum hemorrhage coding in the Swedish Pregnancy Register |
title | Accuracy of postpartum hemorrhage coding in the Swedish Pregnancy Register |
title_full | Accuracy of postpartum hemorrhage coding in the Swedish Pregnancy Register |
title_fullStr | Accuracy of postpartum hemorrhage coding in the Swedish Pregnancy Register |
title_full_unstemmed | Accuracy of postpartum hemorrhage coding in the Swedish Pregnancy Register |
title_short | Accuracy of postpartum hemorrhage coding in the Swedish Pregnancy Register |
title_sort | accuracy of postpartum hemorrhage coding in the swedish pregnancy register |
topic | Epidemiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7891624/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32956490 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13994 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ladforslinneav accuracyofpostpartumhemorrhagecodingintheswedishpregnancyregister AT muracagiuliam accuracyofpostpartumhemorrhagecodingintheswedishpregnancyregister AT butwickalexander accuracyofpostpartumhemorrhagecodingintheswedishpregnancyregister AT edgrengustaf accuracyofpostpartumhemorrhagecodingintheswedishpregnancyregister AT stephanssonolof accuracyofpostpartumhemorrhagecodingintheswedishpregnancyregister |