Cargando…

Accuracy of postpartum hemorrhage coding in the Swedish Pregnancy Register

INTRODUCTION: Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is recognized as a leading cause of obstetric morbidity and mortality. Population‐wide studies have used International Classification of Diseases (ICD) diagnostic codes to track and report the prevalence of PPH. Although the 10th revision (ICD‐10) was introd...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ladfors, Linnea V., Muraca, Giulia M., Butwick, Alexander, Edgren, Gustaf, Stephansson, Olof
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7891624/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32956490
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13994
_version_ 1783652738132869120
author Ladfors, Linnea V.
Muraca, Giulia M.
Butwick, Alexander
Edgren, Gustaf
Stephansson, Olof
author_facet Ladfors, Linnea V.
Muraca, Giulia M.
Butwick, Alexander
Edgren, Gustaf
Stephansson, Olof
author_sort Ladfors, Linnea V.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is recognized as a leading cause of obstetric morbidity and mortality. Population‐wide studies have used International Classification of Diseases (ICD) diagnostic codes to track and report the prevalence of PPH. Although the 10th revision (ICD‐10) was introduced in Sweden in 1997, the accuracy of ICD‐10 codes for PPH is not known. Thus, the aim was to determine the accuracy of diagnostic coding for PPH in the Swedish Pregnancy Register. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 609 807 deliveries in Sweden between 2014 and 2019. Information on ICD‐10 codes for PPH and estimated blood loss were extracted from the Swedish Pregnancy Register. Using an estimated blood loss >1000 mL as the reference standard, we evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of ICD‐10 codes for PPH by estimating sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value with exact binomial 95% confidence intervals (CIs). In our secondary analysis, we assessed the ICD‐10 coding accuracy for severe PPH, defined as an estimated blood loss >1000 mL and transfusion of at least 1 unit of red blood cells registered in the Scandinavian Donations and Transfusion database. RESULTS: Of the 609 807 deliveries, 43 312 (7.1%) had an ICD‐10 code for PPH and 45 071 (7.4%) had an estimated blood loss >1000 mL. The ICD codes had a sensitivity of 88.5% (95% CI 88.2‐88.7), specificity of 99.4% (95% CI 99.4‐99.4), positive predictive value of 92.0% (95% CI 91.8‐92.3) and negative predictive value of 99.1% (95% CI 99.1‐99.1). In our secondary analysis, on deliveries with severe PPH, the sensitivity for an ICD code was 91.3% (95% CI 90.7‐91.9), whereas specificity was 83.5% (95% CI 82.3‐84.6). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that ICD‐10 codes for PPH in Sweden have moderately high sensitivity and excellent specificity. These results suggest that PPH diagnostic codes in medical records and linked pregnancy and birth registers can be used for research, quality improvement and reporting PPH prevalence in Sweden.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7891624
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78916242021-03-02 Accuracy of postpartum hemorrhage coding in the Swedish Pregnancy Register Ladfors, Linnea V. Muraca, Giulia M. Butwick, Alexander Edgren, Gustaf Stephansson, Olof Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Epidemiology INTRODUCTION: Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is recognized as a leading cause of obstetric morbidity and mortality. Population‐wide studies have used International Classification of Diseases (ICD) diagnostic codes to track and report the prevalence of PPH. Although the 10th revision (ICD‐10) was introduced in Sweden in 1997, the accuracy of ICD‐10 codes for PPH is not known. Thus, the aim was to determine the accuracy of diagnostic coding for PPH in the Swedish Pregnancy Register. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 609 807 deliveries in Sweden between 2014 and 2019. Information on ICD‐10 codes for PPH and estimated blood loss were extracted from the Swedish Pregnancy Register. Using an estimated blood loss >1000 mL as the reference standard, we evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of ICD‐10 codes for PPH by estimating sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value with exact binomial 95% confidence intervals (CIs). In our secondary analysis, we assessed the ICD‐10 coding accuracy for severe PPH, defined as an estimated blood loss >1000 mL and transfusion of at least 1 unit of red blood cells registered in the Scandinavian Donations and Transfusion database. RESULTS: Of the 609 807 deliveries, 43 312 (7.1%) had an ICD‐10 code for PPH and 45 071 (7.4%) had an estimated blood loss >1000 mL. The ICD codes had a sensitivity of 88.5% (95% CI 88.2‐88.7), specificity of 99.4% (95% CI 99.4‐99.4), positive predictive value of 92.0% (95% CI 91.8‐92.3) and negative predictive value of 99.1% (95% CI 99.1‐99.1). In our secondary analysis, on deliveries with severe PPH, the sensitivity for an ICD code was 91.3% (95% CI 90.7‐91.9), whereas specificity was 83.5% (95% CI 82.3‐84.6). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that ICD‐10 codes for PPH in Sweden have moderately high sensitivity and excellent specificity. These results suggest that PPH diagnostic codes in medical records and linked pregnancy and birth registers can be used for research, quality improvement and reporting PPH prevalence in Sweden. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-10-04 2021-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7891624/ /pubmed/32956490 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13994 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology (NFOG) This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Epidemiology
Ladfors, Linnea V.
Muraca, Giulia M.
Butwick, Alexander
Edgren, Gustaf
Stephansson, Olof
Accuracy of postpartum hemorrhage coding in the Swedish Pregnancy Register
title Accuracy of postpartum hemorrhage coding in the Swedish Pregnancy Register
title_full Accuracy of postpartum hemorrhage coding in the Swedish Pregnancy Register
title_fullStr Accuracy of postpartum hemorrhage coding in the Swedish Pregnancy Register
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of postpartum hemorrhage coding in the Swedish Pregnancy Register
title_short Accuracy of postpartum hemorrhage coding in the Swedish Pregnancy Register
title_sort accuracy of postpartum hemorrhage coding in the swedish pregnancy register
topic Epidemiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7891624/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32956490
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13994
work_keys_str_mv AT ladforslinneav accuracyofpostpartumhemorrhagecodingintheswedishpregnancyregister
AT muracagiuliam accuracyofpostpartumhemorrhagecodingintheswedishpregnancyregister
AT butwickalexander accuracyofpostpartumhemorrhagecodingintheswedishpregnancyregister
AT edgrengustaf accuracyofpostpartumhemorrhagecodingintheswedishpregnancyregister
AT stephanssonolof accuracyofpostpartumhemorrhagecodingintheswedishpregnancyregister