Cargando…

Seed predation selects for reproductive variability and synchrony in perennial plants

Annually variable and synchronous seed production by plant populations, or masting, is a widespread reproductive strategy in long‐lived plants. Masting is thought to be selectively beneficial because interannual variability and synchrony increase the fitness of plants through economies of scale that...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bogdziewicz, Michał, Szymkowiak, Jakub, Tanentzap, Andrew J., Calama, Rafael, Marino, Shealyn, Steele, Michael A., Seget, Barbara, Piechnik, Łukasz, Żywiec, Magdalena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7891628/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32744333
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.16835
_version_ 1783652739111190528
author Bogdziewicz, Michał
Szymkowiak, Jakub
Tanentzap, Andrew J.
Calama, Rafael
Marino, Shealyn
Steele, Michael A.
Seget, Barbara
Piechnik, Łukasz
Żywiec, Magdalena
author_facet Bogdziewicz, Michał
Szymkowiak, Jakub
Tanentzap, Andrew J.
Calama, Rafael
Marino, Shealyn
Steele, Michael A.
Seget, Barbara
Piechnik, Łukasz
Żywiec, Magdalena
author_sort Bogdziewicz, Michał
collection PubMed
description Annually variable and synchronous seed production by plant populations, or masting, is a widespread reproductive strategy in long‐lived plants. Masting is thought to be selectively beneficial because interannual variability and synchrony increase the fitness of plants through economies of scale that decrease the cost of reproduction per surviving offspring. Predator satiation is believed to be a key economy of scale, but whether it can drive phenotypic evolution for masting in plants has been rarely explored. We used data from seven plant species (Quercus humilis, Quercus ilex, Quercus rubra, Quercus alba, Quercus montana, Sorbus aucuparia and Pinus pinea) to determine whether predispersal seed predation selects for plant phenotypes that mast. Predation selected for interannual variability in Mediterranean oaks (Q. humilis and Q. ilex), for synchrony in Q. rubra, and for both interannual variability and reproductive synchrony in S. aucuparia and P. pinea. Predation never selected for negative temporal autocorrelation of seed production. Predation by invertebrates appears to select for only some aspects of masting, most importantly high coefficient of variation, supporting individual‐level benefits of the population‐level phenomenon of mast seeding. Determining the selective benefits of masting is complex because of interactions with other seed predators, which may impose contradictory selective pressures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7891628
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78916282021-03-02 Seed predation selects for reproductive variability and synchrony in perennial plants Bogdziewicz, Michał Szymkowiak, Jakub Tanentzap, Andrew J. Calama, Rafael Marino, Shealyn Steele, Michael A. Seget, Barbara Piechnik, Łukasz Żywiec, Magdalena New Phytol Research Annually variable and synchronous seed production by plant populations, or masting, is a widespread reproductive strategy in long‐lived plants. Masting is thought to be selectively beneficial because interannual variability and synchrony increase the fitness of plants through economies of scale that decrease the cost of reproduction per surviving offspring. Predator satiation is believed to be a key economy of scale, but whether it can drive phenotypic evolution for masting in plants has been rarely explored. We used data from seven plant species (Quercus humilis, Quercus ilex, Quercus rubra, Quercus alba, Quercus montana, Sorbus aucuparia and Pinus pinea) to determine whether predispersal seed predation selects for plant phenotypes that mast. Predation selected for interannual variability in Mediterranean oaks (Q. humilis and Q. ilex), for synchrony in Q. rubra, and for both interannual variability and reproductive synchrony in S. aucuparia and P. pinea. Predation never selected for negative temporal autocorrelation of seed production. Predation by invertebrates appears to select for only some aspects of masting, most importantly high coefficient of variation, supporting individual‐level benefits of the population‐level phenomenon of mast seeding. Determining the selective benefits of masting is complex because of interactions with other seed predators, which may impose contradictory selective pressures. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-08-19 2021-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7891628/ /pubmed/32744333 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.16835 Text en © 2020 The Authors. New Phytologist © 2020 New Phytologist Foundation This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Research
Bogdziewicz, Michał
Szymkowiak, Jakub
Tanentzap, Andrew J.
Calama, Rafael
Marino, Shealyn
Steele, Michael A.
Seget, Barbara
Piechnik, Łukasz
Żywiec, Magdalena
Seed predation selects for reproductive variability and synchrony in perennial plants
title Seed predation selects for reproductive variability and synchrony in perennial plants
title_full Seed predation selects for reproductive variability and synchrony in perennial plants
title_fullStr Seed predation selects for reproductive variability and synchrony in perennial plants
title_full_unstemmed Seed predation selects for reproductive variability and synchrony in perennial plants
title_short Seed predation selects for reproductive variability and synchrony in perennial plants
title_sort seed predation selects for reproductive variability and synchrony in perennial plants
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7891628/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32744333
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.16835
work_keys_str_mv AT bogdziewiczmichał seedpredationselectsforreproductivevariabilityandsynchronyinperennialplants
AT szymkowiakjakub seedpredationselectsforreproductivevariabilityandsynchronyinperennialplants
AT tanentzapandrewj seedpredationselectsforreproductivevariabilityandsynchronyinperennialplants
AT calamarafael seedpredationselectsforreproductivevariabilityandsynchronyinperennialplants
AT marinoshealyn seedpredationselectsforreproductivevariabilityandsynchronyinperennialplants
AT steelemichaela seedpredationselectsforreproductivevariabilityandsynchronyinperennialplants
AT segetbarbara seedpredationselectsforreproductivevariabilityandsynchronyinperennialplants
AT piechnikłukasz seedpredationselectsforreproductivevariabilityandsynchronyinperennialplants
AT zywiecmagdalena seedpredationselectsforreproductivevariabilityandsynchronyinperennialplants