Cargando…
Seed predation selects for reproductive variability and synchrony in perennial plants
Annually variable and synchronous seed production by plant populations, or masting, is a widespread reproductive strategy in long‐lived plants. Masting is thought to be selectively beneficial because interannual variability and synchrony increase the fitness of plants through economies of scale that...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7891628/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32744333 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.16835 |
_version_ | 1783652739111190528 |
---|---|
author | Bogdziewicz, Michał Szymkowiak, Jakub Tanentzap, Andrew J. Calama, Rafael Marino, Shealyn Steele, Michael A. Seget, Barbara Piechnik, Łukasz Żywiec, Magdalena |
author_facet | Bogdziewicz, Michał Szymkowiak, Jakub Tanentzap, Andrew J. Calama, Rafael Marino, Shealyn Steele, Michael A. Seget, Barbara Piechnik, Łukasz Żywiec, Magdalena |
author_sort | Bogdziewicz, Michał |
collection | PubMed |
description | Annually variable and synchronous seed production by plant populations, or masting, is a widespread reproductive strategy in long‐lived plants. Masting is thought to be selectively beneficial because interannual variability and synchrony increase the fitness of plants through economies of scale that decrease the cost of reproduction per surviving offspring. Predator satiation is believed to be a key economy of scale, but whether it can drive phenotypic evolution for masting in plants has been rarely explored. We used data from seven plant species (Quercus humilis, Quercus ilex, Quercus rubra, Quercus alba, Quercus montana, Sorbus aucuparia and Pinus pinea) to determine whether predispersal seed predation selects for plant phenotypes that mast. Predation selected for interannual variability in Mediterranean oaks (Q. humilis and Q. ilex), for synchrony in Q. rubra, and for both interannual variability and reproductive synchrony in S. aucuparia and P. pinea. Predation never selected for negative temporal autocorrelation of seed production. Predation by invertebrates appears to select for only some aspects of masting, most importantly high coefficient of variation, supporting individual‐level benefits of the population‐level phenomenon of mast seeding. Determining the selective benefits of masting is complex because of interactions with other seed predators, which may impose contradictory selective pressures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7891628 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78916282021-03-02 Seed predation selects for reproductive variability and synchrony in perennial plants Bogdziewicz, Michał Szymkowiak, Jakub Tanentzap, Andrew J. Calama, Rafael Marino, Shealyn Steele, Michael A. Seget, Barbara Piechnik, Łukasz Żywiec, Magdalena New Phytol Research Annually variable and synchronous seed production by plant populations, or masting, is a widespread reproductive strategy in long‐lived plants. Masting is thought to be selectively beneficial because interannual variability and synchrony increase the fitness of plants through economies of scale that decrease the cost of reproduction per surviving offspring. Predator satiation is believed to be a key economy of scale, but whether it can drive phenotypic evolution for masting in plants has been rarely explored. We used data from seven plant species (Quercus humilis, Quercus ilex, Quercus rubra, Quercus alba, Quercus montana, Sorbus aucuparia and Pinus pinea) to determine whether predispersal seed predation selects for plant phenotypes that mast. Predation selected for interannual variability in Mediterranean oaks (Q. humilis and Q. ilex), for synchrony in Q. rubra, and for both interannual variability and reproductive synchrony in S. aucuparia and P. pinea. Predation never selected for negative temporal autocorrelation of seed production. Predation by invertebrates appears to select for only some aspects of masting, most importantly high coefficient of variation, supporting individual‐level benefits of the population‐level phenomenon of mast seeding. Determining the selective benefits of masting is complex because of interactions with other seed predators, which may impose contradictory selective pressures. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-08-19 2021-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7891628/ /pubmed/32744333 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.16835 Text en © 2020 The Authors. New Phytologist © 2020 New Phytologist Foundation This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Research Bogdziewicz, Michał Szymkowiak, Jakub Tanentzap, Andrew J. Calama, Rafael Marino, Shealyn Steele, Michael A. Seget, Barbara Piechnik, Łukasz Żywiec, Magdalena Seed predation selects for reproductive variability and synchrony in perennial plants |
title | Seed predation selects for reproductive variability and synchrony in perennial plants |
title_full | Seed predation selects for reproductive variability and synchrony in perennial plants |
title_fullStr | Seed predation selects for reproductive variability and synchrony in perennial plants |
title_full_unstemmed | Seed predation selects for reproductive variability and synchrony in perennial plants |
title_short | Seed predation selects for reproductive variability and synchrony in perennial plants |
title_sort | seed predation selects for reproductive variability and synchrony in perennial plants |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7891628/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32744333 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.16835 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bogdziewiczmichał seedpredationselectsforreproductivevariabilityandsynchronyinperennialplants AT szymkowiakjakub seedpredationselectsforreproductivevariabilityandsynchronyinperennialplants AT tanentzapandrewj seedpredationselectsforreproductivevariabilityandsynchronyinperennialplants AT calamarafael seedpredationselectsforreproductivevariabilityandsynchronyinperennialplants AT marinoshealyn seedpredationselectsforreproductivevariabilityandsynchronyinperennialplants AT steelemichaela seedpredationselectsforreproductivevariabilityandsynchronyinperennialplants AT segetbarbara seedpredationselectsforreproductivevariabilityandsynchronyinperennialplants AT piechnikłukasz seedpredationselectsforreproductivevariabilityandsynchronyinperennialplants AT zywiecmagdalena seedpredationselectsforreproductivevariabilityandsynchronyinperennialplants |