Cargando…

Simulation of Lake‐Groundwater Interaction under Steady‐State Flow

MODFLOW is one of the most popular groundwater simulation tools available; however, the development of lake modules that can be coupled with MODFLOW is lacking apart from the LAK3 package. This study proposes a new approach for simulating lake‐groundwater interaction under steady‐state flow, referre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lu, Chuiyu, Zhang, Bo, He, Xin, Cao, Guoliang, Sun, Qingyan, Yan, Lingjia, Qin, Tao, Li, Tianchen, Li, Zepeng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7891635/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32700342
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gwat.13033
_version_ 1783652740960878592
author Lu, Chuiyu
Zhang, Bo
He, Xin
Cao, Guoliang
Sun, Qingyan
Yan, Lingjia
Qin, Tao
Li, Tianchen
Li, Zepeng
author_facet Lu, Chuiyu
Zhang, Bo
He, Xin
Cao, Guoliang
Sun, Qingyan
Yan, Lingjia
Qin, Tao
Li, Tianchen
Li, Zepeng
author_sort Lu, Chuiyu
collection PubMed
description MODFLOW is one of the most popular groundwater simulation tools available; however, the development of lake modules that can be coupled with MODFLOW is lacking apart from the LAK3 package. This study proposes a new approach for simulating lake‐groundwater interaction under steady‐state flow, referred to as the sloping lakebed method (SLM). In this new approach, discretization of the lakebed in the vertical direction is independent of the spatial discretization of the aquifer system, which can potentially solve the problem that the lake and groundwater are usually simulated at different scales. The lakebed is generalized by a slant at the bottom of each lake grid cell, which can be classified as fully submerged, dry, and partly submerged. The SLM method accounts for all lake sources and sinks, establishing a governing equation that can be solved using Newton's method. A benchmarking case study was conducted using a modified model setup in the LAK3 user manual. It was found that when there is a sufficient number of layers at the top of the groundwater model, SLM simulates an almost identical groundwater head as the LAK3‐based model; when the number of layers decreases, SLM is unaffected while LAK3 may be at a risk of giving unrealistic results. Additionally, the SLM can reflect the relationship between the simulated lake surface area and lake water depth more accurately. Therefore, the SLM method is a promising alternative to the LAK3 package when simulating lake‐groundwater interaction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7891635
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78916352021-03-02 Simulation of Lake‐Groundwater Interaction under Steady‐State Flow Lu, Chuiyu Zhang, Bo He, Xin Cao, Guoliang Sun, Qingyan Yan, Lingjia Qin, Tao Li, Tianchen Li, Zepeng Ground Water Methods Notes/ MODFLOW is one of the most popular groundwater simulation tools available; however, the development of lake modules that can be coupled with MODFLOW is lacking apart from the LAK3 package. This study proposes a new approach for simulating lake‐groundwater interaction under steady‐state flow, referred to as the sloping lakebed method (SLM). In this new approach, discretization of the lakebed in the vertical direction is independent of the spatial discretization of the aquifer system, which can potentially solve the problem that the lake and groundwater are usually simulated at different scales. The lakebed is generalized by a slant at the bottom of each lake grid cell, which can be classified as fully submerged, dry, and partly submerged. The SLM method accounts for all lake sources and sinks, establishing a governing equation that can be solved using Newton's method. A benchmarking case study was conducted using a modified model setup in the LAK3 user manual. It was found that when there is a sufficient number of layers at the top of the groundwater model, SLM simulates an almost identical groundwater head as the LAK3‐based model; when the number of layers decreases, SLM is unaffected while LAK3 may be at a risk of giving unrealistic results. Additionally, the SLM can reflect the relationship between the simulated lake surface area and lake water depth more accurately. Therefore, the SLM method is a promising alternative to the LAK3 package when simulating lake‐groundwater interaction. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2020-08-17 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7891635/ /pubmed/32700342 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gwat.13033 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Groundwater published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of National Ground Water Association. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Methods Notes/
Lu, Chuiyu
Zhang, Bo
He, Xin
Cao, Guoliang
Sun, Qingyan
Yan, Lingjia
Qin, Tao
Li, Tianchen
Li, Zepeng
Simulation of Lake‐Groundwater Interaction under Steady‐State Flow
title Simulation of Lake‐Groundwater Interaction under Steady‐State Flow
title_full Simulation of Lake‐Groundwater Interaction under Steady‐State Flow
title_fullStr Simulation of Lake‐Groundwater Interaction under Steady‐State Flow
title_full_unstemmed Simulation of Lake‐Groundwater Interaction under Steady‐State Flow
title_short Simulation of Lake‐Groundwater Interaction under Steady‐State Flow
title_sort simulation of lake‐groundwater interaction under steady‐state flow
topic Methods Notes/
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7891635/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32700342
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gwat.13033
work_keys_str_mv AT luchuiyu simulationoflakegroundwaterinteractionundersteadystateflow
AT zhangbo simulationoflakegroundwaterinteractionundersteadystateflow
AT hexin simulationoflakegroundwaterinteractionundersteadystateflow
AT caoguoliang simulationoflakegroundwaterinteractionundersteadystateflow
AT sunqingyan simulationoflakegroundwaterinteractionundersteadystateflow
AT yanlingjia simulationoflakegroundwaterinteractionundersteadystateflow
AT qintao simulationoflakegroundwaterinteractionundersteadystateflow
AT litianchen simulationoflakegroundwaterinteractionundersteadystateflow
AT lizepeng simulationoflakegroundwaterinteractionundersteadystateflow