Cargando…
Simulation of Lake‐Groundwater Interaction under Steady‐State Flow
MODFLOW is one of the most popular groundwater simulation tools available; however, the development of lake modules that can be coupled with MODFLOW is lacking apart from the LAK3 package. This study proposes a new approach for simulating lake‐groundwater interaction under steady‐state flow, referre...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7891635/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32700342 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gwat.13033 |
_version_ | 1783652740960878592 |
---|---|
author | Lu, Chuiyu Zhang, Bo He, Xin Cao, Guoliang Sun, Qingyan Yan, Lingjia Qin, Tao Li, Tianchen Li, Zepeng |
author_facet | Lu, Chuiyu Zhang, Bo He, Xin Cao, Guoliang Sun, Qingyan Yan, Lingjia Qin, Tao Li, Tianchen Li, Zepeng |
author_sort | Lu, Chuiyu |
collection | PubMed |
description | MODFLOW is one of the most popular groundwater simulation tools available; however, the development of lake modules that can be coupled with MODFLOW is lacking apart from the LAK3 package. This study proposes a new approach for simulating lake‐groundwater interaction under steady‐state flow, referred to as the sloping lakebed method (SLM). In this new approach, discretization of the lakebed in the vertical direction is independent of the spatial discretization of the aquifer system, which can potentially solve the problem that the lake and groundwater are usually simulated at different scales. The lakebed is generalized by a slant at the bottom of each lake grid cell, which can be classified as fully submerged, dry, and partly submerged. The SLM method accounts for all lake sources and sinks, establishing a governing equation that can be solved using Newton's method. A benchmarking case study was conducted using a modified model setup in the LAK3 user manual. It was found that when there is a sufficient number of layers at the top of the groundwater model, SLM simulates an almost identical groundwater head as the LAK3‐based model; when the number of layers decreases, SLM is unaffected while LAK3 may be at a risk of giving unrealistic results. Additionally, the SLM can reflect the relationship between the simulated lake surface area and lake water depth more accurately. Therefore, the SLM method is a promising alternative to the LAK3 package when simulating lake‐groundwater interaction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7891635 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78916352021-03-02 Simulation of Lake‐Groundwater Interaction under Steady‐State Flow Lu, Chuiyu Zhang, Bo He, Xin Cao, Guoliang Sun, Qingyan Yan, Lingjia Qin, Tao Li, Tianchen Li, Zepeng Ground Water Methods Notes/ MODFLOW is one of the most popular groundwater simulation tools available; however, the development of lake modules that can be coupled with MODFLOW is lacking apart from the LAK3 package. This study proposes a new approach for simulating lake‐groundwater interaction under steady‐state flow, referred to as the sloping lakebed method (SLM). In this new approach, discretization of the lakebed in the vertical direction is independent of the spatial discretization of the aquifer system, which can potentially solve the problem that the lake and groundwater are usually simulated at different scales. The lakebed is generalized by a slant at the bottom of each lake grid cell, which can be classified as fully submerged, dry, and partly submerged. The SLM method accounts for all lake sources and sinks, establishing a governing equation that can be solved using Newton's method. A benchmarking case study was conducted using a modified model setup in the LAK3 user manual. It was found that when there is a sufficient number of layers at the top of the groundwater model, SLM simulates an almost identical groundwater head as the LAK3‐based model; when the number of layers decreases, SLM is unaffected while LAK3 may be at a risk of giving unrealistic results. Additionally, the SLM can reflect the relationship between the simulated lake surface area and lake water depth more accurately. Therefore, the SLM method is a promising alternative to the LAK3 package when simulating lake‐groundwater interaction. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2020-08-17 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7891635/ /pubmed/32700342 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gwat.13033 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Groundwater published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of National Ground Water Association. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Methods Notes/ Lu, Chuiyu Zhang, Bo He, Xin Cao, Guoliang Sun, Qingyan Yan, Lingjia Qin, Tao Li, Tianchen Li, Zepeng Simulation of Lake‐Groundwater Interaction under Steady‐State Flow |
title | Simulation of Lake‐Groundwater Interaction under Steady‐State Flow |
title_full | Simulation of Lake‐Groundwater Interaction under Steady‐State Flow |
title_fullStr | Simulation of Lake‐Groundwater Interaction under Steady‐State Flow |
title_full_unstemmed | Simulation of Lake‐Groundwater Interaction under Steady‐State Flow |
title_short | Simulation of Lake‐Groundwater Interaction under Steady‐State Flow |
title_sort | simulation of lake‐groundwater interaction under steady‐state flow |
topic | Methods Notes/ |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7891635/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32700342 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gwat.13033 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT luchuiyu simulationoflakegroundwaterinteractionundersteadystateflow AT zhangbo simulationoflakegroundwaterinteractionundersteadystateflow AT hexin simulationoflakegroundwaterinteractionundersteadystateflow AT caoguoliang simulationoflakegroundwaterinteractionundersteadystateflow AT sunqingyan simulationoflakegroundwaterinteractionundersteadystateflow AT yanlingjia simulationoflakegroundwaterinteractionundersteadystateflow AT qintao simulationoflakegroundwaterinteractionundersteadystateflow AT litianchen simulationoflakegroundwaterinteractionundersteadystateflow AT lizepeng simulationoflakegroundwaterinteractionundersteadystateflow |