Cargando…

Multi-annual performance evaluation of laboratories in post-mortem diagnosis of animal rabies: Which techniques lead to the most reliable results in practice?

Rabies diagnosis proficiency tests on animal specimens using four techniques (FAT, RTCIT, conventional RT-PCR and real-time RT-PCR) were organised over 10 years (2009–2019). Seventy-three laboratories, of which 59% were from Europe, took part. As the panels were prepared with experimentally-infected...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Robardet, Emmanuelle, Servat, Alexandre, Rieder, Jonathan, Picard-Meyer, Evelyne, Cliquet, Florence
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7891719/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33544702
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009111
_version_ 1783652759015260160
author Robardet, Emmanuelle
Servat, Alexandre
Rieder, Jonathan
Picard-Meyer, Evelyne
Cliquet, Florence
author_facet Robardet, Emmanuelle
Servat, Alexandre
Rieder, Jonathan
Picard-Meyer, Evelyne
Cliquet, Florence
author_sort Robardet, Emmanuelle
collection PubMed
description Rabies diagnosis proficiency tests on animal specimens using four techniques (FAT, RTCIT, conventional RT-PCR and real-time RT-PCR) were organised over 10 years (2009–2019). Seventy-three laboratories, of which 59% were from Europe, took part. As the panels were prepared with experimentally-infected samples, the error rate of laboratories on positive and negative samples was accurately estimated. Based on fitted values produced by mixed modelling including the variable “laboratory” as a random variable to take into account the longitudinal design of our dataset, the technique that provided the most concordant results was conventional RT-PCR (99.3%; 95% CI 99.0–99.6), closely followed by FAT (99.1%; 95% CI 98.7–99.4), real-time RT-PCR (98.7%; 95% CI 98.1–99.3) and then RTCIT (96.8%; 95% CI 95.8–97.7). We also found that conventional RT-PCR provided a better diagnostic sensitivity level (99.3% ±4.4%) than FAT (98.7% ±1.6%), real-time RT-PCR (97.9% ±0.8%) and RTCIT (95.3% ±5.1%). Regarding diagnostic specificity, RTCIT was the most specific technique (96.4% ±3.9%) followed closely by FAT (95.6% ±3.8%), real-time RT-PCR (95.0% ±1.8%) and conventional RT-PCR (92.9% ±0.5%). Due to multiple testing of the samples with different techniques, the overall diagnostic conclusion was also evaluated, and found to reach an inter-laboratory concordance level of 99.3%. The concordance for diagnostic sensitivity was 99.6% ±2.0% and for diagnostic specificity, 98.0% ±8.5%. Molecular biology techniques were, however, found to be less specific than expected. The potential reasons for such findings are discussed herein. The regular organisation of performance tests has contributed to an increase in the performance of participating laboratories over time, demonstrating the benefits of such testing. Maintaining a high-quality rabies diagnosis capability on a global scale is key to achieving the goal of eliminating dog-mediated human rabies deaths. The regular organisation of exercises on each continent using selected local strains to be tested according to the local epidemiological situation is one factor that could help increase reliable diagnosis worldwide. Rabies diagnosis capabilities could indeed be enhanced by providing adequate and sustainable proficiency testing on a large scale and in the long term
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7891719
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78917192021-03-01 Multi-annual performance evaluation of laboratories in post-mortem diagnosis of animal rabies: Which techniques lead to the most reliable results in practice? Robardet, Emmanuelle Servat, Alexandre Rieder, Jonathan Picard-Meyer, Evelyne Cliquet, Florence PLoS Negl Trop Dis Research Article Rabies diagnosis proficiency tests on animal specimens using four techniques (FAT, RTCIT, conventional RT-PCR and real-time RT-PCR) were organised over 10 years (2009–2019). Seventy-three laboratories, of which 59% were from Europe, took part. As the panels were prepared with experimentally-infected samples, the error rate of laboratories on positive and negative samples was accurately estimated. Based on fitted values produced by mixed modelling including the variable “laboratory” as a random variable to take into account the longitudinal design of our dataset, the technique that provided the most concordant results was conventional RT-PCR (99.3%; 95% CI 99.0–99.6), closely followed by FAT (99.1%; 95% CI 98.7–99.4), real-time RT-PCR (98.7%; 95% CI 98.1–99.3) and then RTCIT (96.8%; 95% CI 95.8–97.7). We also found that conventional RT-PCR provided a better diagnostic sensitivity level (99.3% ±4.4%) than FAT (98.7% ±1.6%), real-time RT-PCR (97.9% ±0.8%) and RTCIT (95.3% ±5.1%). Regarding diagnostic specificity, RTCIT was the most specific technique (96.4% ±3.9%) followed closely by FAT (95.6% ±3.8%), real-time RT-PCR (95.0% ±1.8%) and conventional RT-PCR (92.9% ±0.5%). Due to multiple testing of the samples with different techniques, the overall diagnostic conclusion was also evaluated, and found to reach an inter-laboratory concordance level of 99.3%. The concordance for diagnostic sensitivity was 99.6% ±2.0% and for diagnostic specificity, 98.0% ±8.5%. Molecular biology techniques were, however, found to be less specific than expected. The potential reasons for such findings are discussed herein. The regular organisation of performance tests has contributed to an increase in the performance of participating laboratories over time, demonstrating the benefits of such testing. Maintaining a high-quality rabies diagnosis capability on a global scale is key to achieving the goal of eliminating dog-mediated human rabies deaths. The regular organisation of exercises on each continent using selected local strains to be tested according to the local epidemiological situation is one factor that could help increase reliable diagnosis worldwide. Rabies diagnosis capabilities could indeed be enhanced by providing adequate and sustainable proficiency testing on a large scale and in the long term Public Library of Science 2021-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7891719/ /pubmed/33544702 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009111 Text en © 2021 Robardet et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Robardet, Emmanuelle
Servat, Alexandre
Rieder, Jonathan
Picard-Meyer, Evelyne
Cliquet, Florence
Multi-annual performance evaluation of laboratories in post-mortem diagnosis of animal rabies: Which techniques lead to the most reliable results in practice?
title Multi-annual performance evaluation of laboratories in post-mortem diagnosis of animal rabies: Which techniques lead to the most reliable results in practice?
title_full Multi-annual performance evaluation of laboratories in post-mortem diagnosis of animal rabies: Which techniques lead to the most reliable results in practice?
title_fullStr Multi-annual performance evaluation of laboratories in post-mortem diagnosis of animal rabies: Which techniques lead to the most reliable results in practice?
title_full_unstemmed Multi-annual performance evaluation of laboratories in post-mortem diagnosis of animal rabies: Which techniques lead to the most reliable results in practice?
title_short Multi-annual performance evaluation of laboratories in post-mortem diagnosis of animal rabies: Which techniques lead to the most reliable results in practice?
title_sort multi-annual performance evaluation of laboratories in post-mortem diagnosis of animal rabies: which techniques lead to the most reliable results in practice?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7891719/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33544702
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009111
work_keys_str_mv AT robardetemmanuelle multiannualperformanceevaluationoflaboratoriesinpostmortemdiagnosisofanimalrabieswhichtechniquesleadtothemostreliableresultsinpractice
AT servatalexandre multiannualperformanceevaluationoflaboratoriesinpostmortemdiagnosisofanimalrabieswhichtechniquesleadtothemostreliableresultsinpractice
AT riederjonathan multiannualperformanceevaluationoflaboratoriesinpostmortemdiagnosisofanimalrabieswhichtechniquesleadtothemostreliableresultsinpractice
AT picardmeyerevelyne multiannualperformanceevaluationoflaboratoriesinpostmortemdiagnosisofanimalrabieswhichtechniquesleadtothemostreliableresultsinpractice
AT cliquetflorence multiannualperformanceevaluationoflaboratoriesinpostmortemdiagnosisofanimalrabieswhichtechniquesleadtothemostreliableresultsinpractice