Cargando…

Staging esophageal cancer: low EUS accuracy in t2n0 patients

Background and study aims  Esophageal cancer (EC) is one of the most lethal malignancies worldwide. Staging of EC is performed with computed tomography (CT), positron-emission tomography (PET), and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS). Patient management mostly depends on lymph node status. Compared to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Nucci, Germana, Petrone, Maria Chiara, Imperatore, Nicola, Asti, Emanuele, Rossi, Gemma, Manes, Giampiero, Vecchi, Maurizio, Pastorelli, Luca, Bonavina, Luigi, Arcidiacono, Paolo Giorgio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2021
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7892275/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33655027
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1336-2505
_version_ 1783652813093470208
author de Nucci, Germana
Petrone, Maria Chiara
Imperatore, Nicola
Asti, Emanuele
Rossi, Gemma
Manes, Giampiero
Vecchi, Maurizio
Pastorelli, Luca
Bonavina, Luigi
Arcidiacono, Paolo Giorgio
author_facet de Nucci, Germana
Petrone, Maria Chiara
Imperatore, Nicola
Asti, Emanuele
Rossi, Gemma
Manes, Giampiero
Vecchi, Maurizio
Pastorelli, Luca
Bonavina, Luigi
Arcidiacono, Paolo Giorgio
author_sort de Nucci, Germana
collection PubMed
description Background and study aims  Esophageal cancer (EC) is one of the most lethal malignancies worldwide. Staging of EC is performed with computed tomography (CT), positron-emission tomography (PET), and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS). Patient management mostly depends on lymph node status. Compared to histopathology, the accuracy of EUS for T and N parameters is about 85 % and 75 %, respectively. Errors in staging may change prognosis. The aim of this study was to assess the role of EUS in T2-N0 EC considering the experience of two high-volume digestive endoscopic centers. Methods  Two prospectively collected databases were queried to identify all patients with EC, staged as cT2N0 by EUS, with no distant metastases at CT/PET scan and who underwent transthoracic esophagectomy. Preoperative EUS staging (cTNM) was compared to histopathology of the surgical specimen (pTNM) to evaluate accuracy. Results  Of 729 consecutive patients with EC between January 2011 and September 2018, 72 (49 men) had cT2N0 disease. CT and PET scans confirmed the absence of distant metastasis. In 43 of 72 patients (60 %), the evaluation was correct, 23 of 72 (31,7 %) were understaged, and six of 72 patients (8,3 %) were overstaged. Among the understaged patients, eight were understaged by tumor depth (35 %), seven by nodal involvement (30 %), and eight by both (35 %). All six patients who were overstaged had T1b-N0 disease. EUS accuracy was 77 % in staging for tumor depth and 82 % in staging for nodal metastases. The positive predictive value (PPV) for cT2N0 EC was 60 % (43 pT2N0 /72 cT2N). Conclusions  The accuracy of EUS staging of T2N0 EC is low, with only 60 % of patients undergoing appropriate therapy based on histopathology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7892275
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78922752021-03-01 Staging esophageal cancer: low EUS accuracy in t2n0 patients de Nucci, Germana Petrone, Maria Chiara Imperatore, Nicola Asti, Emanuele Rossi, Gemma Manes, Giampiero Vecchi, Maurizio Pastorelli, Luca Bonavina, Luigi Arcidiacono, Paolo Giorgio Endosc Int Open Background and study aims  Esophageal cancer (EC) is one of the most lethal malignancies worldwide. Staging of EC is performed with computed tomography (CT), positron-emission tomography (PET), and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS). Patient management mostly depends on lymph node status. Compared to histopathology, the accuracy of EUS for T and N parameters is about 85 % and 75 %, respectively. Errors in staging may change prognosis. The aim of this study was to assess the role of EUS in T2-N0 EC considering the experience of two high-volume digestive endoscopic centers. Methods  Two prospectively collected databases were queried to identify all patients with EC, staged as cT2N0 by EUS, with no distant metastases at CT/PET scan and who underwent transthoracic esophagectomy. Preoperative EUS staging (cTNM) was compared to histopathology of the surgical specimen (pTNM) to evaluate accuracy. Results  Of 729 consecutive patients with EC between January 2011 and September 2018, 72 (49 men) had cT2N0 disease. CT and PET scans confirmed the absence of distant metastasis. In 43 of 72 patients (60 %), the evaluation was correct, 23 of 72 (31,7 %) were understaged, and six of 72 patients (8,3 %) were overstaged. Among the understaged patients, eight were understaged by tumor depth (35 %), seven by nodal involvement (30 %), and eight by both (35 %). All six patients who were overstaged had T1b-N0 disease. EUS accuracy was 77 % in staging for tumor depth and 82 % in staging for nodal metastases. The positive predictive value (PPV) for cT2N0 EC was 60 % (43 pT2N0 /72 cT2N). Conclusions  The accuracy of EUS staging of T2N0 EC is low, with only 60 % of patients undergoing appropriate therapy based on histopathology. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2021-03 2021-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7892275/ /pubmed/33655027 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1336-2505 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle de Nucci, Germana
Petrone, Maria Chiara
Imperatore, Nicola
Asti, Emanuele
Rossi, Gemma
Manes, Giampiero
Vecchi, Maurizio
Pastorelli, Luca
Bonavina, Luigi
Arcidiacono, Paolo Giorgio
Staging esophageal cancer: low EUS accuracy in t2n0 patients
title Staging esophageal cancer: low EUS accuracy in t2n0 patients
title_full Staging esophageal cancer: low EUS accuracy in t2n0 patients
title_fullStr Staging esophageal cancer: low EUS accuracy in t2n0 patients
title_full_unstemmed Staging esophageal cancer: low EUS accuracy in t2n0 patients
title_short Staging esophageal cancer: low EUS accuracy in t2n0 patients
title_sort staging esophageal cancer: low eus accuracy in t2n0 patients
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7892275/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33655027
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1336-2505
work_keys_str_mv AT denuccigermana stagingesophagealcancerloweusaccuracyint2n0patients
AT petronemariachiara stagingesophagealcancerloweusaccuracyint2n0patients
AT imperatorenicola stagingesophagealcancerloweusaccuracyint2n0patients
AT astiemanuele stagingesophagealcancerloweusaccuracyint2n0patients
AT rossigemma stagingesophagealcancerloweusaccuracyint2n0patients
AT manesgiampiero stagingesophagealcancerloweusaccuracyint2n0patients
AT vecchimaurizio stagingesophagealcancerloweusaccuracyint2n0patients
AT pastorelliluca stagingesophagealcancerloweusaccuracyint2n0patients
AT bonavinaluigi stagingesophagealcancerloweusaccuracyint2n0patients
AT arcidiaconopaologiorgio stagingesophagealcancerloweusaccuracyint2n0patients