Cargando…
No Impact of Cerebellar Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation at Three Different Timings on Motor Learning in a Sequential Finger-Tapping Task
Background: Recently, attention has grown toward cerebellar neuromodulation in motor learning using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). An important point of discussion regarding this modulation is the optimal timing of tDCS, as this parameter could significantly influence the outcome. H...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7892471/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33613217 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.631517 |
_version_ | 1783652851909656576 |
---|---|
author | Nguemeni, Carine Stiehl, Annika Hiew, Shawn Zeller, Daniel |
author_facet | Nguemeni, Carine Stiehl, Annika Hiew, Shawn Zeller, Daniel |
author_sort | Nguemeni, Carine |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Recently, attention has grown toward cerebellar neuromodulation in motor learning using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). An important point of discussion regarding this modulation is the optimal timing of tDCS, as this parameter could significantly influence the outcome. Hence, this study aimed to investigate the effects of the timing of cerebellar anodal tDCS (ca-tDCS) on motor learning using a sequential finger-tapping task (FTT). Methods: One hundred and twenty two healthy young, right-handed subjects (96 females) were randomized into four groups (During(sham), Before, During(real), After). They performed 2 days of FTT with their non-dominant hand on a custom keyboard. The task consisted of 40 s of typing followed by 20 s rest. Each participant received ca-tDCS (2 mA, sponge electrodes of 25 cm(2), 20 min) at the appropriate timing and performed 20 trials on the first day (T1, 20 min). On the following day, only 10 trials of FTT were performed without tDCS (T2, 10 min). Motor skill performance and retention were assessed. Results: All participants showed a time-dependent increase in learning. Motor performance was not different between groups at the end of T1 (p = 0.59). ca-tDCS did not facilitate the retention of the motor skill in the FTT at T2 (p = 0.27). Thus, our findings indicate an absence of the effect of ca-tDCS on motor performance or retention of the FTT independently from the timing of stimulation. Conclusion: The present results suggest that the outcome of ca-tDCS is highly dependent on the task and stimulation parameters. Future studies need to establish a clear basis for the successful and reproducible clinical application of ca-tDCS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7892471 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78924712021-02-20 No Impact of Cerebellar Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation at Three Different Timings on Motor Learning in a Sequential Finger-Tapping Task Nguemeni, Carine Stiehl, Annika Hiew, Shawn Zeller, Daniel Front Hum Neurosci Human Neuroscience Background: Recently, attention has grown toward cerebellar neuromodulation in motor learning using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). An important point of discussion regarding this modulation is the optimal timing of tDCS, as this parameter could significantly influence the outcome. Hence, this study aimed to investigate the effects of the timing of cerebellar anodal tDCS (ca-tDCS) on motor learning using a sequential finger-tapping task (FTT). Methods: One hundred and twenty two healthy young, right-handed subjects (96 females) were randomized into four groups (During(sham), Before, During(real), After). They performed 2 days of FTT with their non-dominant hand on a custom keyboard. The task consisted of 40 s of typing followed by 20 s rest. Each participant received ca-tDCS (2 mA, sponge electrodes of 25 cm(2), 20 min) at the appropriate timing and performed 20 trials on the first day (T1, 20 min). On the following day, only 10 trials of FTT were performed without tDCS (T2, 10 min). Motor skill performance and retention were assessed. Results: All participants showed a time-dependent increase in learning. Motor performance was not different between groups at the end of T1 (p = 0.59). ca-tDCS did not facilitate the retention of the motor skill in the FTT at T2 (p = 0.27). Thus, our findings indicate an absence of the effect of ca-tDCS on motor performance or retention of the FTT independently from the timing of stimulation. Conclusion: The present results suggest that the outcome of ca-tDCS is highly dependent on the task and stimulation parameters. Future studies need to establish a clear basis for the successful and reproducible clinical application of ca-tDCS. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7892471/ /pubmed/33613217 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.631517 Text en Copyright © 2021 Nguemeni, Stiehl, Hiew and Zeller. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Human Neuroscience Nguemeni, Carine Stiehl, Annika Hiew, Shawn Zeller, Daniel No Impact of Cerebellar Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation at Three Different Timings on Motor Learning in a Sequential Finger-Tapping Task |
title | No Impact of Cerebellar Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation at Three Different Timings on Motor Learning in a Sequential Finger-Tapping Task |
title_full | No Impact of Cerebellar Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation at Three Different Timings on Motor Learning in a Sequential Finger-Tapping Task |
title_fullStr | No Impact of Cerebellar Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation at Three Different Timings on Motor Learning in a Sequential Finger-Tapping Task |
title_full_unstemmed | No Impact of Cerebellar Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation at Three Different Timings on Motor Learning in a Sequential Finger-Tapping Task |
title_short | No Impact of Cerebellar Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation at Three Different Timings on Motor Learning in a Sequential Finger-Tapping Task |
title_sort | no impact of cerebellar anodal transcranial direct current stimulation at three different timings on motor learning in a sequential finger-tapping task |
topic | Human Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7892471/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33613217 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.631517 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nguemenicarine noimpactofcerebellaranodaltranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationatthreedifferenttimingsonmotorlearninginasequentialfingertappingtask AT stiehlannika noimpactofcerebellaranodaltranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationatthreedifferenttimingsonmotorlearninginasequentialfingertappingtask AT hiewshawn noimpactofcerebellaranodaltranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationatthreedifferenttimingsonmotorlearninginasequentialfingertappingtask AT zellerdaniel noimpactofcerebellaranodaltranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationatthreedifferenttimingsonmotorlearninginasequentialfingertappingtask |