Cargando…

A comparison of statistical methods for assessing winter wheat grain yield stability

The multitude of existing methods for assessing the phenotypic stability of plants makes breeders be faced with the problem of choosing an appropriate variant. The purpose of this study was to compare different methods of analyzing the genotype × environment interaction and, on their basis, assess t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cheshkova, A.F., Stepochkin, P.I., Aleynikov, A.F., Grebennikova, I.G., Ponomarenko, V.I.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Federal Research Center Institute of Cytology and Genetics of Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7892496/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33659808
http://dx.doi.org/10.18699/VJ20.619
_version_ 1783652857801605120
author Cheshkova, A.F.
Stepochkin, P.I.
Aleynikov, A.F.
Grebennikova, I.G.
Ponomarenko, V.I.
author_facet Cheshkova, A.F.
Stepochkin, P.I.
Aleynikov, A.F.
Grebennikova, I.G.
Ponomarenko, V.I.
author_sort Cheshkova, A.F.
collection PubMed
description The multitude of existing methods for assessing the phenotypic stability of plants makes breeders be faced with the problem of choosing an appropriate variant. The purpose of this study was to compare different methods of analyzing the genotype × environment interaction and, on their basis, assess the stability of the yield of 7 varieties of winter wheat. The article compares 17 stability statistics by applying them to data obtained from agrotechnical experiments carried in 2009–2011 for evaluating the grain yield of 7 varieties of winter common wheat of Siberian selection (Novosibirskaya 32, Novosibirskaya 40, Novosibirskaya 51, Novosibirskaya 3, Novosibirskaya 2, Obskaya winter, Omskaya 6). Analysis of variance revealed a significant ( p < 0.001) genotype × environment interaction in the experiments, which indicates a different reaction of genotypes to changes in environmental conditions. Genotypes were ranked according to the level of stability. Based on the analysis of the rank correlation matrix, the stability statistics were categorized in five groups. Recommendations were made on which group of methods to use depending on the objectives of the study. In the case when the goal of breeding research is the selection of the most biologically stable varieties with the minimum variance across a range of environments, one should use the methods of the static concept. If it is necessary to choose a genotype with a predictable reaction to changes of environmental conditions, corresponding to the calculated level or forecast, the regression approach is the most appropriate. The stability statistics generally identified Novosibirskaya 32 as the most stable variety from a biological point of view. The regression approach showed that Novosibirskaya 3 was the genotype with the smallest deviation from mean yield in all environments, while methods accessing the contribution of each genotype to the genotype × environment interaction defined Novosibirskaya 51 as the most stable variety.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7892496
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The Federal Research Center Institute of Cytology and Genetics of Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78924962021-03-02 A comparison of statistical methods for assessing winter wheat grain yield stability Cheshkova, A.F. Stepochkin, P.I. Aleynikov, A.F. Grebennikova, I.G. Ponomarenko, V.I. Vavilovskii Zhurnal Genet Selektsii Original Article The multitude of existing methods for assessing the phenotypic stability of plants makes breeders be faced with the problem of choosing an appropriate variant. The purpose of this study was to compare different methods of analyzing the genotype × environment interaction and, on their basis, assess the stability of the yield of 7 varieties of winter wheat. The article compares 17 stability statistics by applying them to data obtained from agrotechnical experiments carried in 2009–2011 for evaluating the grain yield of 7 varieties of winter common wheat of Siberian selection (Novosibirskaya 32, Novosibirskaya 40, Novosibirskaya 51, Novosibirskaya 3, Novosibirskaya 2, Obskaya winter, Omskaya 6). Analysis of variance revealed a significant ( p < 0.001) genotype × environment interaction in the experiments, which indicates a different reaction of genotypes to changes in environmental conditions. Genotypes were ranked according to the level of stability. Based on the analysis of the rank correlation matrix, the stability statistics were categorized in five groups. Recommendations were made on which group of methods to use depending on the objectives of the study. In the case when the goal of breeding research is the selection of the most biologically stable varieties with the minimum variance across a range of environments, one should use the methods of the static concept. If it is necessary to choose a genotype with a predictable reaction to changes of environmental conditions, corresponding to the calculated level or forecast, the regression approach is the most appropriate. The stability statistics generally identified Novosibirskaya 32 as the most stable variety from a biological point of view. The regression approach showed that Novosibirskaya 3 was the genotype with the smallest deviation from mean yield in all environments, while methods accessing the contribution of each genotype to the genotype × environment interaction defined Novosibirskaya 51 as the most stable variety. The Federal Research Center Institute of Cytology and Genetics of Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences 2020-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7892496/ /pubmed/33659808 http://dx.doi.org/10.18699/VJ20.619 Text en Copyright © AUTHORS, 2020 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License
spellingShingle Original Article
Cheshkova, A.F.
Stepochkin, P.I.
Aleynikov, A.F.
Grebennikova, I.G.
Ponomarenko, V.I.
A comparison of statistical methods for assessing winter wheat grain yield stability
title A comparison of statistical methods for assessing winter wheat grain yield stability
title_full A comparison of statistical methods for assessing winter wheat grain yield stability
title_fullStr A comparison of statistical methods for assessing winter wheat grain yield stability
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of statistical methods for assessing winter wheat grain yield stability
title_short A comparison of statistical methods for assessing winter wheat grain yield stability
title_sort comparison of statistical methods for assessing winter wheat grain yield stability
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7892496/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33659808
http://dx.doi.org/10.18699/VJ20.619
work_keys_str_mv AT cheshkovaaf acomparisonofstatisticalmethodsforassessingwinterwheatgrainyieldstability
AT stepochkinpi acomparisonofstatisticalmethodsforassessingwinterwheatgrainyieldstability
AT aleynikovaf acomparisonofstatisticalmethodsforassessingwinterwheatgrainyieldstability
AT grebennikovaig acomparisonofstatisticalmethodsforassessingwinterwheatgrainyieldstability
AT ponomarenkovi acomparisonofstatisticalmethodsforassessingwinterwheatgrainyieldstability
AT cheshkovaaf comparisonofstatisticalmethodsforassessingwinterwheatgrainyieldstability
AT stepochkinpi comparisonofstatisticalmethodsforassessingwinterwheatgrainyieldstability
AT aleynikovaf comparisonofstatisticalmethodsforassessingwinterwheatgrainyieldstability
AT grebennikovaig comparisonofstatisticalmethodsforassessingwinterwheatgrainyieldstability
AT ponomarenkovi comparisonofstatisticalmethodsforassessingwinterwheatgrainyieldstability