Cargando…

The knowns and unknowns of neural adaptations to resistance training

The initial increases in force production with resistance training are thought to be primarily underpinned by neural adaptations. This notion is firmly supported by evidence displaying motor unit adaptations following resistance training; however, the precise locus of neural adaptation remains elusi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Škarabot, Jakob, Brownstein, Callum G., Casolo, Andrea, Del Vecchio, Alessandro, Ansdell, Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7892509/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33355714
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00421-020-04567-3
_version_ 1783652860618080256
author Škarabot, Jakob
Brownstein, Callum G.
Casolo, Andrea
Del Vecchio, Alessandro
Ansdell, Paul
author_facet Škarabot, Jakob
Brownstein, Callum G.
Casolo, Andrea
Del Vecchio, Alessandro
Ansdell, Paul
author_sort Škarabot, Jakob
collection PubMed
description The initial increases in force production with resistance training are thought to be primarily underpinned by neural adaptations. This notion is firmly supported by evidence displaying motor unit adaptations following resistance training; however, the precise locus of neural adaptation remains elusive. The purpose of this review is to clarify and critically discuss the literature concerning the site(s) of putative neural adaptations to short-term resistance training. The proliferation of studies employing non-invasive stimulation techniques to investigate evoked responses have yielded variable results, but generally support the notion that resistance training alters intracortical inhibition. Nevertheless, methodological inconsistencies and the limitations of techniques, e.g. limited relation to behavioural outcomes and the inability to measure volitional muscle activity, preclude firm conclusions. Much of the literature has focused on the corticospinal tract; however, preliminary research in non-human primates suggests reticulospinal tract is a potential substrate for neural adaptations to resistance training, though human data is lacking due to methodological constraints. Recent advances in technology have provided substantial evidence of adaptations within a large motor unit population following resistance training. However, their activity represents the transformation of afferent and efferent inputs, making it challenging to establish the source of adaptation. Whilst much has been learned about the nature of neural adaptations to resistance training, the puzzle remains to be solved. Additional analyses of motoneuron firing during different training regimes or coupling with other methodologies (e.g., electroencephalography) may facilitate the estimation of the site(s) of neural adaptations to resistance training in the future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7892509
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78925092021-03-03 The knowns and unknowns of neural adaptations to resistance training Škarabot, Jakob Brownstein, Callum G. Casolo, Andrea Del Vecchio, Alessandro Ansdell, Paul Eur J Appl Physiol Invited Review The initial increases in force production with resistance training are thought to be primarily underpinned by neural adaptations. This notion is firmly supported by evidence displaying motor unit adaptations following resistance training; however, the precise locus of neural adaptation remains elusive. The purpose of this review is to clarify and critically discuss the literature concerning the site(s) of putative neural adaptations to short-term resistance training. The proliferation of studies employing non-invasive stimulation techniques to investigate evoked responses have yielded variable results, but generally support the notion that resistance training alters intracortical inhibition. Nevertheless, methodological inconsistencies and the limitations of techniques, e.g. limited relation to behavioural outcomes and the inability to measure volitional muscle activity, preclude firm conclusions. Much of the literature has focused on the corticospinal tract; however, preliminary research in non-human primates suggests reticulospinal tract is a potential substrate for neural adaptations to resistance training, though human data is lacking due to methodological constraints. Recent advances in technology have provided substantial evidence of adaptations within a large motor unit population following resistance training. However, their activity represents the transformation of afferent and efferent inputs, making it challenging to establish the source of adaptation. Whilst much has been learned about the nature of neural adaptations to resistance training, the puzzle remains to be solved. Additional analyses of motoneuron firing during different training regimes or coupling with other methodologies (e.g., electroencephalography) may facilitate the estimation of the site(s) of neural adaptations to resistance training in the future. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-12-23 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7892509/ /pubmed/33355714 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00421-020-04567-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Invited Review
Škarabot, Jakob
Brownstein, Callum G.
Casolo, Andrea
Del Vecchio, Alessandro
Ansdell, Paul
The knowns and unknowns of neural adaptations to resistance training
title The knowns and unknowns of neural adaptations to resistance training
title_full The knowns and unknowns of neural adaptations to resistance training
title_fullStr The knowns and unknowns of neural adaptations to resistance training
title_full_unstemmed The knowns and unknowns of neural adaptations to resistance training
title_short The knowns and unknowns of neural adaptations to resistance training
title_sort knowns and unknowns of neural adaptations to resistance training
topic Invited Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7892509/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33355714
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00421-020-04567-3
work_keys_str_mv AT skarabotjakob theknownsandunknownsofneuraladaptationstoresistancetraining
AT brownsteincallumg theknownsandunknownsofneuraladaptationstoresistancetraining
AT casoloandrea theknownsandunknownsofneuraladaptationstoresistancetraining
AT delvecchioalessandro theknownsandunknownsofneuraladaptationstoresistancetraining
AT ansdellpaul theknownsandunknownsofneuraladaptationstoresistancetraining
AT skarabotjakob knownsandunknownsofneuraladaptationstoresistancetraining
AT brownsteincallumg knownsandunknownsofneuraladaptationstoresistancetraining
AT casoloandrea knownsandunknownsofneuraladaptationstoresistancetraining
AT delvecchioalessandro knownsandunknownsofneuraladaptationstoresistancetraining
AT ansdellpaul knownsandunknownsofneuraladaptationstoresistancetraining