Cargando…
The knowns and unknowns of neural adaptations to resistance training
The initial increases in force production with resistance training are thought to be primarily underpinned by neural adaptations. This notion is firmly supported by evidence displaying motor unit adaptations following resistance training; however, the precise locus of neural adaptation remains elusi...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7892509/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33355714 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00421-020-04567-3 |
_version_ | 1783652860618080256 |
---|---|
author | Škarabot, Jakob Brownstein, Callum G. Casolo, Andrea Del Vecchio, Alessandro Ansdell, Paul |
author_facet | Škarabot, Jakob Brownstein, Callum G. Casolo, Andrea Del Vecchio, Alessandro Ansdell, Paul |
author_sort | Škarabot, Jakob |
collection | PubMed |
description | The initial increases in force production with resistance training are thought to be primarily underpinned by neural adaptations. This notion is firmly supported by evidence displaying motor unit adaptations following resistance training; however, the precise locus of neural adaptation remains elusive. The purpose of this review is to clarify and critically discuss the literature concerning the site(s) of putative neural adaptations to short-term resistance training. The proliferation of studies employing non-invasive stimulation techniques to investigate evoked responses have yielded variable results, but generally support the notion that resistance training alters intracortical inhibition. Nevertheless, methodological inconsistencies and the limitations of techniques, e.g. limited relation to behavioural outcomes and the inability to measure volitional muscle activity, preclude firm conclusions. Much of the literature has focused on the corticospinal tract; however, preliminary research in non-human primates suggests reticulospinal tract is a potential substrate for neural adaptations to resistance training, though human data is lacking due to methodological constraints. Recent advances in technology have provided substantial evidence of adaptations within a large motor unit population following resistance training. However, their activity represents the transformation of afferent and efferent inputs, making it challenging to establish the source of adaptation. Whilst much has been learned about the nature of neural adaptations to resistance training, the puzzle remains to be solved. Additional analyses of motoneuron firing during different training regimes or coupling with other methodologies (e.g., electroencephalography) may facilitate the estimation of the site(s) of neural adaptations to resistance training in the future. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7892509 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78925092021-03-03 The knowns and unknowns of neural adaptations to resistance training Škarabot, Jakob Brownstein, Callum G. Casolo, Andrea Del Vecchio, Alessandro Ansdell, Paul Eur J Appl Physiol Invited Review The initial increases in force production with resistance training are thought to be primarily underpinned by neural adaptations. This notion is firmly supported by evidence displaying motor unit adaptations following resistance training; however, the precise locus of neural adaptation remains elusive. The purpose of this review is to clarify and critically discuss the literature concerning the site(s) of putative neural adaptations to short-term resistance training. The proliferation of studies employing non-invasive stimulation techniques to investigate evoked responses have yielded variable results, but generally support the notion that resistance training alters intracortical inhibition. Nevertheless, methodological inconsistencies and the limitations of techniques, e.g. limited relation to behavioural outcomes and the inability to measure volitional muscle activity, preclude firm conclusions. Much of the literature has focused on the corticospinal tract; however, preliminary research in non-human primates suggests reticulospinal tract is a potential substrate for neural adaptations to resistance training, though human data is lacking due to methodological constraints. Recent advances in technology have provided substantial evidence of adaptations within a large motor unit population following resistance training. However, their activity represents the transformation of afferent and efferent inputs, making it challenging to establish the source of adaptation. Whilst much has been learned about the nature of neural adaptations to resistance training, the puzzle remains to be solved. Additional analyses of motoneuron firing during different training regimes or coupling with other methodologies (e.g., electroencephalography) may facilitate the estimation of the site(s) of neural adaptations to resistance training in the future. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-12-23 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7892509/ /pubmed/33355714 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00421-020-04567-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Invited Review Škarabot, Jakob Brownstein, Callum G. Casolo, Andrea Del Vecchio, Alessandro Ansdell, Paul The knowns and unknowns of neural adaptations to resistance training |
title | The knowns and unknowns of neural adaptations to resistance training |
title_full | The knowns and unknowns of neural adaptations to resistance training |
title_fullStr | The knowns and unknowns of neural adaptations to resistance training |
title_full_unstemmed | The knowns and unknowns of neural adaptations to resistance training |
title_short | The knowns and unknowns of neural adaptations to resistance training |
title_sort | knowns and unknowns of neural adaptations to resistance training |
topic | Invited Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7892509/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33355714 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00421-020-04567-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT skarabotjakob theknownsandunknownsofneuraladaptationstoresistancetraining AT brownsteincallumg theknownsandunknownsofneuraladaptationstoresistancetraining AT casoloandrea theknownsandunknownsofneuraladaptationstoresistancetraining AT delvecchioalessandro theknownsandunknownsofneuraladaptationstoresistancetraining AT ansdellpaul theknownsandunknownsofneuraladaptationstoresistancetraining AT skarabotjakob knownsandunknownsofneuraladaptationstoresistancetraining AT brownsteincallumg knownsandunknownsofneuraladaptationstoresistancetraining AT casoloandrea knownsandunknownsofneuraladaptationstoresistancetraining AT delvecchioalessandro knownsandunknownsofneuraladaptationstoresistancetraining AT ansdellpaul knownsandunknownsofneuraladaptationstoresistancetraining |