Cargando…
Are Jurors Intuitive Statisticians? Bayesian Causal Reasoning in Legal Contexts
In criminal trials, evidence often involves a degree of uncertainty and decision-making includes moving from the initial presumption of innocence to inference about guilt based on that evidence. The jurors’ ability to combine evidence and make accurate intuitive probabilistic judgments underpins thi...
Autores principales: | Shengelia, Tamara, Lagnado, David |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7892609/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33613348 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.519262 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The Embodied Statistician
por: Marsh, Elizabeth R., et al.
Publicado: (2010) -
Intuitive Choices Lead to Intensified Positive Emotions: An Overlooked Reason for “Intuition Bias”?
por: Kirkebøen, Geir, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Women Jurors
Publicado: (1921) -
The Interactive Effects of Race and Expert Testimony on Jurors’ Perceptions of Recanted Confessions
por: Ewanation, Logan, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
The Negative Relationship between Reasoning and Religiosity Is Underpinned by a Bias for Intuitive Responses Specifically When Intuition and Logic Are in Conflict
por: Daws, Richard E., et al.
Publicado: (2017)