Cargando…

The Landmark Series: Minimally Invasive Pancreatic Resection

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic resections are among the most technically demanding procedures, including a high risk of potentially life-threatening complications and outcomes strongly correlated to hospital volume and individual surgeon experience. Minimally invasive pancreatic resections (MIPRs) have beco...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Hilst, Jony, de Graaf, Nine, Abu Hilal, Mohammad, Besselink, Marc G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7892688/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33341916
http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-09335-3
_version_ 1783652897753399296
author van Hilst, Jony
de Graaf, Nine
Abu Hilal, Mohammad
Besselink, Marc G.
author_facet van Hilst, Jony
de Graaf, Nine
Abu Hilal, Mohammad
Besselink, Marc G.
author_sort van Hilst, Jony
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pancreatic resections are among the most technically demanding procedures, including a high risk of potentially life-threatening complications and outcomes strongly correlated to hospital volume and individual surgeon experience. Minimally invasive pancreatic resections (MIPRs) have become a part of standard surgical practice worldwide over the last decade; however, in comparison with other surgical procedures, the implementation of minimally invasive approaches into clinical practice has been rather slow. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to highlight and summarize the available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the role of minimally invasive approaches in pancreatic surgery. METHODS: A WHO trial registry and Pubmed database literature search was performed to identify all RCTs comparing MIPRs (robot-assisted and/or laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy [DP] or pancreatoduodenectomy [PD]) with open pancreatic resections (OPRs). RESULTS: Overall, five RCTs on MIPR versus OPR have been published and seven RCTs are currently recruiting. For DP, the results of two RCTs were in favor of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) in terms of shorter hospital stay and less intraoperative blood loss, with comparable morbidity and mortality. Regarding PD, two RCTs showed similar advantages for MIPD. However, concerns were raised after the early termination of the third multicenter RCT on MIPD versus open PD due to higher complication-related mortality in the laparoscopic group and no clear other demonstrable advantages. No RCTs on robot-assisted pancreatic procedures are available as yet. CONCLUSION: At the current level of evidence, MIDP is thought to be safe and feasible, although oncological safety should be further evaluated. Based on the results of the RCTs conducted for PD, MIPD cannot be proclaimed as the superior alternative to open PD, although promising outcomes have been demonstrated by experienced centers. Future studies should provide answers to the role of robotic approaches in pancreatic surgery and aim to identity the subgroups of patients or indications with the greatest benefit of MIPRs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7892688
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78926882021-03-03 The Landmark Series: Minimally Invasive Pancreatic Resection van Hilst, Jony de Graaf, Nine Abu Hilal, Mohammad Besselink, Marc G. Ann Surg Oncol Hepatobiliary Tumors BACKGROUND: Pancreatic resections are among the most technically demanding procedures, including a high risk of potentially life-threatening complications and outcomes strongly correlated to hospital volume and individual surgeon experience. Minimally invasive pancreatic resections (MIPRs) have become a part of standard surgical practice worldwide over the last decade; however, in comparison with other surgical procedures, the implementation of minimally invasive approaches into clinical practice has been rather slow. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to highlight and summarize the available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the role of minimally invasive approaches in pancreatic surgery. METHODS: A WHO trial registry and Pubmed database literature search was performed to identify all RCTs comparing MIPRs (robot-assisted and/or laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy [DP] or pancreatoduodenectomy [PD]) with open pancreatic resections (OPRs). RESULTS: Overall, five RCTs on MIPR versus OPR have been published and seven RCTs are currently recruiting. For DP, the results of two RCTs were in favor of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) in terms of shorter hospital stay and less intraoperative blood loss, with comparable morbidity and mortality. Regarding PD, two RCTs showed similar advantages for MIPD. However, concerns were raised after the early termination of the third multicenter RCT on MIPD versus open PD due to higher complication-related mortality in the laparoscopic group and no clear other demonstrable advantages. No RCTs on robot-assisted pancreatic procedures are available as yet. CONCLUSION: At the current level of evidence, MIDP is thought to be safe and feasible, although oncological safety should be further evaluated. Based on the results of the RCTs conducted for PD, MIPD cannot be proclaimed as the superior alternative to open PD, although promising outcomes have been demonstrated by experienced centers. Future studies should provide answers to the role of robotic approaches in pancreatic surgery and aim to identity the subgroups of patients or indications with the greatest benefit of MIPRs. Springer International Publishing 2020-12-19 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7892688/ /pubmed/33341916 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-09335-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Hepatobiliary Tumors
van Hilst, Jony
de Graaf, Nine
Abu Hilal, Mohammad
Besselink, Marc G.
The Landmark Series: Minimally Invasive Pancreatic Resection
title The Landmark Series: Minimally Invasive Pancreatic Resection
title_full The Landmark Series: Minimally Invasive Pancreatic Resection
title_fullStr The Landmark Series: Minimally Invasive Pancreatic Resection
title_full_unstemmed The Landmark Series: Minimally Invasive Pancreatic Resection
title_short The Landmark Series: Minimally Invasive Pancreatic Resection
title_sort landmark series: minimally invasive pancreatic resection
topic Hepatobiliary Tumors
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7892688/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33341916
http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-09335-3
work_keys_str_mv AT vanhilstjony thelandmarkseriesminimallyinvasivepancreaticresection
AT degraafnine thelandmarkseriesminimallyinvasivepancreaticresection
AT abuhilalmohammad thelandmarkseriesminimallyinvasivepancreaticresection
AT besselinkmarcg thelandmarkseriesminimallyinvasivepancreaticresection
AT vanhilstjony landmarkseriesminimallyinvasivepancreaticresection
AT degraafnine landmarkseriesminimallyinvasivepancreaticresection
AT abuhilalmohammad landmarkseriesminimallyinvasivepancreaticresection
AT besselinkmarcg landmarkseriesminimallyinvasivepancreaticresection