Cargando…
Risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in patients with metastatic cancer not receiving granulocyte colony-stimulating factor prophylaxis in US clinical practice
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) prophylaxis in US patients with selected metastatic cancers and chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia (FN) incidence and associated outcomes among the subgroup who did not receive prophylaxis. METHODS: This retrospec...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7892737/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32880732 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-020-05715-3 |
_version_ | 1783652909585530880 |
---|---|
author | Averin, Ahuva Silvia, Amanda Lamerato, Lois Richert-Boe, Kathryn Kaur, Manpreet Sundaresan, Devi Shah, Neel Hatfield, Mark Lawrence, Tatiana Lyman, Gary H. Weycker, Derek |
author_facet | Averin, Ahuva Silvia, Amanda Lamerato, Lois Richert-Boe, Kathryn Kaur, Manpreet Sundaresan, Devi Shah, Neel Hatfield, Mark Lawrence, Tatiana Lyman, Gary H. Weycker, Derek |
author_sort | Averin, Ahuva |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) prophylaxis in US patients with selected metastatic cancers and chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia (FN) incidence and associated outcomes among the subgroup who did not receive prophylaxis. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at four US health systems and included adults with metastatic cancer (breast, colorectal, lung, non-Hodgkin lymphoma [NHL]) who received myelosuppressive chemotherapy (2009–2017). Patients were stratified by FN risk level based on risk factors and chemotherapy (low/unclassified risk, intermediate risk without any risk factors, intermediate risk with ≥ 1 risk factor [IR + 1], high risk [HR]). G-CSF use was evaluated among all patients stratified by FN risk, and FN/FN-related outcomes were evaluated among patients who did not receive first-cycle G-CSF prophylaxis. RESULTS: Among 1457 metastatic cancer patients, 20.5% and 28.1% were classified as HR and IR + 1, respectively. First-cycle G-CSF prophylaxis use was 48.5% among HR patients and 13.9% among IR + 1 patients. In the subgroup not receiving first-cycle G-CSF prophylaxis, FN incidence in cycle 1 was 7.8% for HR patients and 4.8% for IR + 1 patients; during the course, corresponding values were 16.9% and 15.9%. Most (> 90%) FN episodes required hospitalization, and mortality risk ranged from 7.1 to 26.9% across subgroups. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective study, the majority of metastatic cancer chemotherapy patients for whom G-CSF prophylaxis is recommended did not receive it; FN incidence in this subgroup was notably high. Patients with elevated FN risk should be carefully identified and managed to ensure appropriate use of supportive care. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00520-020-05715-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7892737 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78927372021-03-03 Risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in patients with metastatic cancer not receiving granulocyte colony-stimulating factor prophylaxis in US clinical practice Averin, Ahuva Silvia, Amanda Lamerato, Lois Richert-Boe, Kathryn Kaur, Manpreet Sundaresan, Devi Shah, Neel Hatfield, Mark Lawrence, Tatiana Lyman, Gary H. Weycker, Derek Support Care Cancer Original Article OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) prophylaxis in US patients with selected metastatic cancers and chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia (FN) incidence and associated outcomes among the subgroup who did not receive prophylaxis. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at four US health systems and included adults with metastatic cancer (breast, colorectal, lung, non-Hodgkin lymphoma [NHL]) who received myelosuppressive chemotherapy (2009–2017). Patients were stratified by FN risk level based on risk factors and chemotherapy (low/unclassified risk, intermediate risk without any risk factors, intermediate risk with ≥ 1 risk factor [IR + 1], high risk [HR]). G-CSF use was evaluated among all patients stratified by FN risk, and FN/FN-related outcomes were evaluated among patients who did not receive first-cycle G-CSF prophylaxis. RESULTS: Among 1457 metastatic cancer patients, 20.5% and 28.1% were classified as HR and IR + 1, respectively. First-cycle G-CSF prophylaxis use was 48.5% among HR patients and 13.9% among IR + 1 patients. In the subgroup not receiving first-cycle G-CSF prophylaxis, FN incidence in cycle 1 was 7.8% for HR patients and 4.8% for IR + 1 patients; during the course, corresponding values were 16.9% and 15.9%. Most (> 90%) FN episodes required hospitalization, and mortality risk ranged from 7.1 to 26.9% across subgroups. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective study, the majority of metastatic cancer chemotherapy patients for whom G-CSF prophylaxis is recommended did not receive it; FN incidence in this subgroup was notably high. Patients with elevated FN risk should be carefully identified and managed to ensure appropriate use of supportive care. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00520-020-05715-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-09-03 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7892737/ /pubmed/32880732 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-020-05715-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Averin, Ahuva Silvia, Amanda Lamerato, Lois Richert-Boe, Kathryn Kaur, Manpreet Sundaresan, Devi Shah, Neel Hatfield, Mark Lawrence, Tatiana Lyman, Gary H. Weycker, Derek Risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in patients with metastatic cancer not receiving granulocyte colony-stimulating factor prophylaxis in US clinical practice |
title | Risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in patients with metastatic cancer not receiving granulocyte colony-stimulating factor prophylaxis in US clinical practice |
title_full | Risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in patients with metastatic cancer not receiving granulocyte colony-stimulating factor prophylaxis in US clinical practice |
title_fullStr | Risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in patients with metastatic cancer not receiving granulocyte colony-stimulating factor prophylaxis in US clinical practice |
title_full_unstemmed | Risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in patients with metastatic cancer not receiving granulocyte colony-stimulating factor prophylaxis in US clinical practice |
title_short | Risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in patients with metastatic cancer not receiving granulocyte colony-stimulating factor prophylaxis in US clinical practice |
title_sort | risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in patients with metastatic cancer not receiving granulocyte colony-stimulating factor prophylaxis in us clinical practice |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7892737/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32880732 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-020-05715-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT averinahuva riskofchemotherapyinducedfebrileneutropeniainpatientswithmetastaticcancernotreceivinggranulocytecolonystimulatingfactorprophylaxisinusclinicalpractice AT silviaamanda riskofchemotherapyinducedfebrileneutropeniainpatientswithmetastaticcancernotreceivinggranulocytecolonystimulatingfactorprophylaxisinusclinicalpractice AT lameratolois riskofchemotherapyinducedfebrileneutropeniainpatientswithmetastaticcancernotreceivinggranulocytecolonystimulatingfactorprophylaxisinusclinicalpractice AT richertboekathryn riskofchemotherapyinducedfebrileneutropeniainpatientswithmetastaticcancernotreceivinggranulocytecolonystimulatingfactorprophylaxisinusclinicalpractice AT kaurmanpreet riskofchemotherapyinducedfebrileneutropeniainpatientswithmetastaticcancernotreceivinggranulocytecolonystimulatingfactorprophylaxisinusclinicalpractice AT sundaresandevi riskofchemotherapyinducedfebrileneutropeniainpatientswithmetastaticcancernotreceivinggranulocytecolonystimulatingfactorprophylaxisinusclinicalpractice AT shahneel riskofchemotherapyinducedfebrileneutropeniainpatientswithmetastaticcancernotreceivinggranulocytecolonystimulatingfactorprophylaxisinusclinicalpractice AT hatfieldmark riskofchemotherapyinducedfebrileneutropeniainpatientswithmetastaticcancernotreceivinggranulocytecolonystimulatingfactorprophylaxisinusclinicalpractice AT lawrencetatiana riskofchemotherapyinducedfebrileneutropeniainpatientswithmetastaticcancernotreceivinggranulocytecolonystimulatingfactorprophylaxisinusclinicalpractice AT lymangaryh riskofchemotherapyinducedfebrileneutropeniainpatientswithmetastaticcancernotreceivinggranulocytecolonystimulatingfactorprophylaxisinusclinicalpractice AT weyckerderek riskofchemotherapyinducedfebrileneutropeniainpatientswithmetastaticcancernotreceivinggranulocytecolonystimulatingfactorprophylaxisinusclinicalpractice |