Cargando…

Single incision laparoscopic surgery using conventional laparoscopic instruments versus two-port laparoscopic surgery for adnexal lesions

Single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) has emerged as least invasive interventions for gynecologic disease. However, SILS is slow to gain in popularity due to difficulties in triangulation and instrument crowding. Besides, the costly instruments may influence patients’ will to have this procedu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Kuan-Ju, Lin, Kuan-Ting, Wu, Chin-Jui, Li, Ying-Xuan, Chang, Wen-Chun, Sheu, Bor-Ching
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7892849/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33602951
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82204-5
_version_ 1783652934988333056
author Huang, Kuan-Ju
Lin, Kuan-Ting
Wu, Chin-Jui
Li, Ying-Xuan
Chang, Wen-Chun
Sheu, Bor-Ching
author_facet Huang, Kuan-Ju
Lin, Kuan-Ting
Wu, Chin-Jui
Li, Ying-Xuan
Chang, Wen-Chun
Sheu, Bor-Ching
author_sort Huang, Kuan-Ju
collection PubMed
description Single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) has emerged as least invasive interventions for gynecologic disease. However, SILS is slow to gain in popularity due to difficulties in triangulation and instrument crowding. Besides, the costly instruments may influence patients’ will to have this procedure, and limit other medical expense as well. To optimize outcome and reduce cost, the objective of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and safety for patients undergoing adnexal surgeries using conventional laparoscopic instruments with SILS (SILS-C), and to compare with those of patients subject to TP using conventional laparoscopic instruments (TP-C). This is a retrospective case–control study. The data dated from April 2011 to April 2018. Patients who received concomitant multiple surgeries, were diagnosed with suspected advanced stage ovarian malignancy, or required frozen sections for intraoperative pathologic diagnosis were excluded. Demographic data, including the age, body weight, height, previous abdominal surgery were obtained. The surgical outcomes were compared using conventional statistical methods. 259 patients received SILS-C. The operating time was 63.83 ± 25.31 min. Blood loss was 2.38 ± 6.09 c.c. 58 patients (24.38%) needed addition of port to complete surgery. 384 patients received TP-C. Compared with SILS-C, the operating time was shorter (57.32 ± 26.38 min, OR = 0.984, CI = 0.975–0.992). The patients were further divided into unilateral or bilateral adnexectomy, and unilateral or bilateral cystectomy. Other than the operating time in unilateral cystectomy (66.12 ± 19.5 vs. 58.27 ± 23.92 min, p = .002), no statistical differences were observed in the subgroup analysis. Single incision laparoscopic surgery using conventional laparoscopic instruments is feasible and safe as initial approach to adnexal lesions. In complex setting as unilateral cystectomy or pelvic adhesions, two-port access may be considered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7892849
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78928492021-02-23 Single incision laparoscopic surgery using conventional laparoscopic instruments versus two-port laparoscopic surgery for adnexal lesions Huang, Kuan-Ju Lin, Kuan-Ting Wu, Chin-Jui Li, Ying-Xuan Chang, Wen-Chun Sheu, Bor-Ching Sci Rep Article Single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) has emerged as least invasive interventions for gynecologic disease. However, SILS is slow to gain in popularity due to difficulties in triangulation and instrument crowding. Besides, the costly instruments may influence patients’ will to have this procedure, and limit other medical expense as well. To optimize outcome and reduce cost, the objective of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and safety for patients undergoing adnexal surgeries using conventional laparoscopic instruments with SILS (SILS-C), and to compare with those of patients subject to TP using conventional laparoscopic instruments (TP-C). This is a retrospective case–control study. The data dated from April 2011 to April 2018. Patients who received concomitant multiple surgeries, were diagnosed with suspected advanced stage ovarian malignancy, or required frozen sections for intraoperative pathologic diagnosis were excluded. Demographic data, including the age, body weight, height, previous abdominal surgery were obtained. The surgical outcomes were compared using conventional statistical methods. 259 patients received SILS-C. The operating time was 63.83 ± 25.31 min. Blood loss was 2.38 ± 6.09 c.c. 58 patients (24.38%) needed addition of port to complete surgery. 384 patients received TP-C. Compared with SILS-C, the operating time was shorter (57.32 ± 26.38 min, OR = 0.984, CI = 0.975–0.992). The patients were further divided into unilateral or bilateral adnexectomy, and unilateral or bilateral cystectomy. Other than the operating time in unilateral cystectomy (66.12 ± 19.5 vs. 58.27 ± 23.92 min, p = .002), no statistical differences were observed in the subgroup analysis. Single incision laparoscopic surgery using conventional laparoscopic instruments is feasible and safe as initial approach to adnexal lesions. In complex setting as unilateral cystectomy or pelvic adhesions, two-port access may be considered. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7892849/ /pubmed/33602951 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82204-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Huang, Kuan-Ju
Lin, Kuan-Ting
Wu, Chin-Jui
Li, Ying-Xuan
Chang, Wen-Chun
Sheu, Bor-Ching
Single incision laparoscopic surgery using conventional laparoscopic instruments versus two-port laparoscopic surgery for adnexal lesions
title Single incision laparoscopic surgery using conventional laparoscopic instruments versus two-port laparoscopic surgery for adnexal lesions
title_full Single incision laparoscopic surgery using conventional laparoscopic instruments versus two-port laparoscopic surgery for adnexal lesions
title_fullStr Single incision laparoscopic surgery using conventional laparoscopic instruments versus two-port laparoscopic surgery for adnexal lesions
title_full_unstemmed Single incision laparoscopic surgery using conventional laparoscopic instruments versus two-port laparoscopic surgery for adnexal lesions
title_short Single incision laparoscopic surgery using conventional laparoscopic instruments versus two-port laparoscopic surgery for adnexal lesions
title_sort single incision laparoscopic surgery using conventional laparoscopic instruments versus two-port laparoscopic surgery for adnexal lesions
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7892849/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33602951
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82204-5
work_keys_str_mv AT huangkuanju singleincisionlaparoscopicsurgeryusingconventionallaparoscopicinstrumentsversustwoportlaparoscopicsurgeryforadnexallesions
AT linkuanting singleincisionlaparoscopicsurgeryusingconventionallaparoscopicinstrumentsversustwoportlaparoscopicsurgeryforadnexallesions
AT wuchinjui singleincisionlaparoscopicsurgeryusingconventionallaparoscopicinstrumentsversustwoportlaparoscopicsurgeryforadnexallesions
AT liyingxuan singleincisionlaparoscopicsurgeryusingconventionallaparoscopicinstrumentsversustwoportlaparoscopicsurgeryforadnexallesions
AT changwenchun singleincisionlaparoscopicsurgeryusingconventionallaparoscopicinstrumentsversustwoportlaparoscopicsurgeryforadnexallesions
AT sheuborching singleincisionlaparoscopicsurgeryusingconventionallaparoscopicinstrumentsversustwoportlaparoscopicsurgeryforadnexallesions