Cargando…
Single incision laparoscopic surgery using conventional laparoscopic instruments versus two-port laparoscopic surgery for adnexal lesions
Single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) has emerged as least invasive interventions for gynecologic disease. However, SILS is slow to gain in popularity due to difficulties in triangulation and instrument crowding. Besides, the costly instruments may influence patients’ will to have this procedu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7892849/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33602951 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82204-5 |
_version_ | 1783652934988333056 |
---|---|
author | Huang, Kuan-Ju Lin, Kuan-Ting Wu, Chin-Jui Li, Ying-Xuan Chang, Wen-Chun Sheu, Bor-Ching |
author_facet | Huang, Kuan-Ju Lin, Kuan-Ting Wu, Chin-Jui Li, Ying-Xuan Chang, Wen-Chun Sheu, Bor-Ching |
author_sort | Huang, Kuan-Ju |
collection | PubMed |
description | Single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) has emerged as least invasive interventions for gynecologic disease. However, SILS is slow to gain in popularity due to difficulties in triangulation and instrument crowding. Besides, the costly instruments may influence patients’ will to have this procedure, and limit other medical expense as well. To optimize outcome and reduce cost, the objective of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and safety for patients undergoing adnexal surgeries using conventional laparoscopic instruments with SILS (SILS-C), and to compare with those of patients subject to TP using conventional laparoscopic instruments (TP-C). This is a retrospective case–control study. The data dated from April 2011 to April 2018. Patients who received concomitant multiple surgeries, were diagnosed with suspected advanced stage ovarian malignancy, or required frozen sections for intraoperative pathologic diagnosis were excluded. Demographic data, including the age, body weight, height, previous abdominal surgery were obtained. The surgical outcomes were compared using conventional statistical methods. 259 patients received SILS-C. The operating time was 63.83 ± 25.31 min. Blood loss was 2.38 ± 6.09 c.c. 58 patients (24.38%) needed addition of port to complete surgery. 384 patients received TP-C. Compared with SILS-C, the operating time was shorter (57.32 ± 26.38 min, OR = 0.984, CI = 0.975–0.992). The patients were further divided into unilateral or bilateral adnexectomy, and unilateral or bilateral cystectomy. Other than the operating time in unilateral cystectomy (66.12 ± 19.5 vs. 58.27 ± 23.92 min, p = .002), no statistical differences were observed in the subgroup analysis. Single incision laparoscopic surgery using conventional laparoscopic instruments is feasible and safe as initial approach to adnexal lesions. In complex setting as unilateral cystectomy or pelvic adhesions, two-port access may be considered. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7892849 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78928492021-02-23 Single incision laparoscopic surgery using conventional laparoscopic instruments versus two-port laparoscopic surgery for adnexal lesions Huang, Kuan-Ju Lin, Kuan-Ting Wu, Chin-Jui Li, Ying-Xuan Chang, Wen-Chun Sheu, Bor-Ching Sci Rep Article Single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) has emerged as least invasive interventions for gynecologic disease. However, SILS is slow to gain in popularity due to difficulties in triangulation and instrument crowding. Besides, the costly instruments may influence patients’ will to have this procedure, and limit other medical expense as well. To optimize outcome and reduce cost, the objective of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and safety for patients undergoing adnexal surgeries using conventional laparoscopic instruments with SILS (SILS-C), and to compare with those of patients subject to TP using conventional laparoscopic instruments (TP-C). This is a retrospective case–control study. The data dated from April 2011 to April 2018. Patients who received concomitant multiple surgeries, were diagnosed with suspected advanced stage ovarian malignancy, or required frozen sections for intraoperative pathologic diagnosis were excluded. Demographic data, including the age, body weight, height, previous abdominal surgery were obtained. The surgical outcomes were compared using conventional statistical methods. 259 patients received SILS-C. The operating time was 63.83 ± 25.31 min. Blood loss was 2.38 ± 6.09 c.c. 58 patients (24.38%) needed addition of port to complete surgery. 384 patients received TP-C. Compared with SILS-C, the operating time was shorter (57.32 ± 26.38 min, OR = 0.984, CI = 0.975–0.992). The patients were further divided into unilateral or bilateral adnexectomy, and unilateral or bilateral cystectomy. Other than the operating time in unilateral cystectomy (66.12 ± 19.5 vs. 58.27 ± 23.92 min, p = .002), no statistical differences were observed in the subgroup analysis. Single incision laparoscopic surgery using conventional laparoscopic instruments is feasible and safe as initial approach to adnexal lesions. In complex setting as unilateral cystectomy or pelvic adhesions, two-port access may be considered. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7892849/ /pubmed/33602951 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82204-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Huang, Kuan-Ju Lin, Kuan-Ting Wu, Chin-Jui Li, Ying-Xuan Chang, Wen-Chun Sheu, Bor-Ching Single incision laparoscopic surgery using conventional laparoscopic instruments versus two-port laparoscopic surgery for adnexal lesions |
title | Single incision laparoscopic surgery using conventional laparoscopic instruments versus two-port laparoscopic surgery for adnexal lesions |
title_full | Single incision laparoscopic surgery using conventional laparoscopic instruments versus two-port laparoscopic surgery for adnexal lesions |
title_fullStr | Single incision laparoscopic surgery using conventional laparoscopic instruments versus two-port laparoscopic surgery for adnexal lesions |
title_full_unstemmed | Single incision laparoscopic surgery using conventional laparoscopic instruments versus two-port laparoscopic surgery for adnexal lesions |
title_short | Single incision laparoscopic surgery using conventional laparoscopic instruments versus two-port laparoscopic surgery for adnexal lesions |
title_sort | single incision laparoscopic surgery using conventional laparoscopic instruments versus two-port laparoscopic surgery for adnexal lesions |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7892849/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33602951 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82204-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huangkuanju singleincisionlaparoscopicsurgeryusingconventionallaparoscopicinstrumentsversustwoportlaparoscopicsurgeryforadnexallesions AT linkuanting singleincisionlaparoscopicsurgeryusingconventionallaparoscopicinstrumentsversustwoportlaparoscopicsurgeryforadnexallesions AT wuchinjui singleincisionlaparoscopicsurgeryusingconventionallaparoscopicinstrumentsversustwoportlaparoscopicsurgeryforadnexallesions AT liyingxuan singleincisionlaparoscopicsurgeryusingconventionallaparoscopicinstrumentsversustwoportlaparoscopicsurgeryforadnexallesions AT changwenchun singleincisionlaparoscopicsurgeryusingconventionallaparoscopicinstrumentsversustwoportlaparoscopicsurgeryforadnexallesions AT sheuborching singleincisionlaparoscopicsurgeryusingconventionallaparoscopicinstrumentsversustwoportlaparoscopicsurgeryforadnexallesions |