Cargando…

COVID-19 and trauma: how social distancing orders altered the patient population using trauma services during the 2020 pandemic

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have reported changes in trauma volumes resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic and social distancing orders (SDOs) implemented by federal and state governments. However, literature is lacking on demographic, injury and outcome patterns. METHODS: This retrospective, cross-sec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pelzl, Casey E, Salottolo, Kristin, Banton, Kaysie, Madayag, Robert M, Hamilton, David, Duane, Therese M, Carrick, Matthew, Lieser, Mark, Berg, Gina, Bar-Or, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7893208/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34192163
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2020-000645
_version_ 1783653019655602176
author Pelzl, Casey E
Salottolo, Kristin
Banton, Kaysie
Madayag, Robert M
Hamilton, David
Duane, Therese M
Carrick, Matthew
Lieser, Mark
Berg, Gina
Bar-Or, David
author_facet Pelzl, Casey E
Salottolo, Kristin
Banton, Kaysie
Madayag, Robert M
Hamilton, David
Duane, Therese M
Carrick, Matthew
Lieser, Mark
Berg, Gina
Bar-Or, David
author_sort Pelzl, Casey E
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recent studies have reported changes in trauma volumes resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic and social distancing orders (SDOs) implemented by federal and state governments. However, literature is lacking on demographic, injury and outcome patterns. METHODS: This retrospective, cross-sectional study included patients aged ≥18 years at six US level 1 trauma centers. Patients not discharged by the date of data acquisition were excluded. Demographic, injury and outcome variables were assessed across four time periods: period 1 (January 1, 2019–December 31, 2019); period 1b (March 16, 2019–June 30, 2019); period 2 (January 1, 2020–March 15, 2020); and period 3 (March 16, 2020–June 30, 2020). Patients admitted in period 3 were compared with patients presenting during all other periods. Categorical data were compared with χ(2) and Fisher’s exact tests, and continuous data were assessed with Student’s t-tests and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. RESULTS: We identified 18 567 patients: 12 797 patients in period 1 (including 3707 in period 1b), 2488 in period 2 and 3282 in period 3. Compared with period 1, period 3 had a statistically significant decrease in mean patient volume, increase in portion of penetrating injuries, increase in higher levels of trauma activation, change in emergency department discharge disposition locations, increase in in-hospital mortality and a shorter hospital length of stay. Comparison between period 1b and period 3 demonstrated a decrease in mean patient volume, increase in penetrating injuries, increase in high acuity trauma activations and increase in in-hospital mortality rate. From period 2 to period 3, the penetrating injuries rose from 6.7% to 9.4% (p=0.004), injury severity scale ≥25 increased from 5.9% to 7.7% (p=0.002), full trauma team activations increased from 13.7% to 16.4% (p<0.001), interhospital transfers decreased from 36.7% to 31.6% (p<0.001) and the in-hospital mortality rate increased from 3.3% to 4.2% (p=0.003). DISCUSSION: Beyond altering social interactions among people, the federal SDO is associated with changes in trauma volumes, demographics and injury patterns among patients seeking care at six level 1 hospitals during the pandemic. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, prognostic and epidemiological.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7893208
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78932082021-02-22 COVID-19 and trauma: how social distancing orders altered the patient population using trauma services during the 2020 pandemic Pelzl, Casey E Salottolo, Kristin Banton, Kaysie Madayag, Robert M Hamilton, David Duane, Therese M Carrick, Matthew Lieser, Mark Berg, Gina Bar-Or, David Trauma Surg Acute Care Open Original Research BACKGROUND: Recent studies have reported changes in trauma volumes resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic and social distancing orders (SDOs) implemented by federal and state governments. However, literature is lacking on demographic, injury and outcome patterns. METHODS: This retrospective, cross-sectional study included patients aged ≥18 years at six US level 1 trauma centers. Patients not discharged by the date of data acquisition were excluded. Demographic, injury and outcome variables were assessed across four time periods: period 1 (January 1, 2019–December 31, 2019); period 1b (March 16, 2019–June 30, 2019); period 2 (January 1, 2020–March 15, 2020); and period 3 (March 16, 2020–June 30, 2020). Patients admitted in period 3 were compared with patients presenting during all other periods. Categorical data were compared with χ(2) and Fisher’s exact tests, and continuous data were assessed with Student’s t-tests and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. RESULTS: We identified 18 567 patients: 12 797 patients in period 1 (including 3707 in period 1b), 2488 in period 2 and 3282 in period 3. Compared with period 1, period 3 had a statistically significant decrease in mean patient volume, increase in portion of penetrating injuries, increase in higher levels of trauma activation, change in emergency department discharge disposition locations, increase in in-hospital mortality and a shorter hospital length of stay. Comparison between period 1b and period 3 demonstrated a decrease in mean patient volume, increase in penetrating injuries, increase in high acuity trauma activations and increase in in-hospital mortality rate. From period 2 to period 3, the penetrating injuries rose from 6.7% to 9.4% (p=0.004), injury severity scale ≥25 increased from 5.9% to 7.7% (p=0.002), full trauma team activations increased from 13.7% to 16.4% (p<0.001), interhospital transfers decreased from 36.7% to 31.6% (p<0.001) and the in-hospital mortality rate increased from 3.3% to 4.2% (p=0.003). DISCUSSION: Beyond altering social interactions among people, the federal SDO is associated with changes in trauma volumes, demographics and injury patterns among patients seeking care at six level 1 hospitals during the pandemic. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, prognostic and epidemiological. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7893208/ /pubmed/34192163 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2020-000645 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research
Pelzl, Casey E
Salottolo, Kristin
Banton, Kaysie
Madayag, Robert M
Hamilton, David
Duane, Therese M
Carrick, Matthew
Lieser, Mark
Berg, Gina
Bar-Or, David
COVID-19 and trauma: how social distancing orders altered the patient population using trauma services during the 2020 pandemic
title COVID-19 and trauma: how social distancing orders altered the patient population using trauma services during the 2020 pandemic
title_full COVID-19 and trauma: how social distancing orders altered the patient population using trauma services during the 2020 pandemic
title_fullStr COVID-19 and trauma: how social distancing orders altered the patient population using trauma services during the 2020 pandemic
title_full_unstemmed COVID-19 and trauma: how social distancing orders altered the patient population using trauma services during the 2020 pandemic
title_short COVID-19 and trauma: how social distancing orders altered the patient population using trauma services during the 2020 pandemic
title_sort covid-19 and trauma: how social distancing orders altered the patient population using trauma services during the 2020 pandemic
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7893208/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34192163
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2020-000645
work_keys_str_mv AT pelzlcaseye covid19andtraumahowsocialdistancingordersalteredthepatientpopulationusingtraumaservicesduringthe2020pandemic
AT salottolokristin covid19andtraumahowsocialdistancingordersalteredthepatientpopulationusingtraumaservicesduringthe2020pandemic
AT bantonkaysie covid19andtraumahowsocialdistancingordersalteredthepatientpopulationusingtraumaservicesduringthe2020pandemic
AT madayagrobertm covid19andtraumahowsocialdistancingordersalteredthepatientpopulationusingtraumaservicesduringthe2020pandemic
AT hamiltondavid covid19andtraumahowsocialdistancingordersalteredthepatientpopulationusingtraumaservicesduringthe2020pandemic
AT duanetheresem covid19andtraumahowsocialdistancingordersalteredthepatientpopulationusingtraumaservicesduringthe2020pandemic
AT carrickmatthew covid19andtraumahowsocialdistancingordersalteredthepatientpopulationusingtraumaservicesduringthe2020pandemic
AT liesermark covid19andtraumahowsocialdistancingordersalteredthepatientpopulationusingtraumaservicesduringthe2020pandemic
AT berggina covid19andtraumahowsocialdistancingordersalteredthepatientpopulationusingtraumaservicesduringthe2020pandemic
AT barordavid covid19andtraumahowsocialdistancingordersalteredthepatientpopulationusingtraumaservicesduringthe2020pandemic