Cargando…
COVID-19 and trauma: how social distancing orders altered the patient population using trauma services during the 2020 pandemic
BACKGROUND: Recent studies have reported changes in trauma volumes resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic and social distancing orders (SDOs) implemented by federal and state governments. However, literature is lacking on demographic, injury and outcome patterns. METHODS: This retrospective, cross-sec...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7893208/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34192163 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2020-000645 |
_version_ | 1783653019655602176 |
---|---|
author | Pelzl, Casey E Salottolo, Kristin Banton, Kaysie Madayag, Robert M Hamilton, David Duane, Therese M Carrick, Matthew Lieser, Mark Berg, Gina Bar-Or, David |
author_facet | Pelzl, Casey E Salottolo, Kristin Banton, Kaysie Madayag, Robert M Hamilton, David Duane, Therese M Carrick, Matthew Lieser, Mark Berg, Gina Bar-Or, David |
author_sort | Pelzl, Casey E |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Recent studies have reported changes in trauma volumes resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic and social distancing orders (SDOs) implemented by federal and state governments. However, literature is lacking on demographic, injury and outcome patterns. METHODS: This retrospective, cross-sectional study included patients aged ≥18 years at six US level 1 trauma centers. Patients not discharged by the date of data acquisition were excluded. Demographic, injury and outcome variables were assessed across four time periods: period 1 (January 1, 2019–December 31, 2019); period 1b (March 16, 2019–June 30, 2019); period 2 (January 1, 2020–March 15, 2020); and period 3 (March 16, 2020–June 30, 2020). Patients admitted in period 3 were compared with patients presenting during all other periods. Categorical data were compared with χ(2) and Fisher’s exact tests, and continuous data were assessed with Student’s t-tests and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. RESULTS: We identified 18 567 patients: 12 797 patients in period 1 (including 3707 in period 1b), 2488 in period 2 and 3282 in period 3. Compared with period 1, period 3 had a statistically significant decrease in mean patient volume, increase in portion of penetrating injuries, increase in higher levels of trauma activation, change in emergency department discharge disposition locations, increase in in-hospital mortality and a shorter hospital length of stay. Comparison between period 1b and period 3 demonstrated a decrease in mean patient volume, increase in penetrating injuries, increase in high acuity trauma activations and increase in in-hospital mortality rate. From period 2 to period 3, the penetrating injuries rose from 6.7% to 9.4% (p=0.004), injury severity scale ≥25 increased from 5.9% to 7.7% (p=0.002), full trauma team activations increased from 13.7% to 16.4% (p<0.001), interhospital transfers decreased from 36.7% to 31.6% (p<0.001) and the in-hospital mortality rate increased from 3.3% to 4.2% (p=0.003). DISCUSSION: Beyond altering social interactions among people, the federal SDO is associated with changes in trauma volumes, demographics and injury patterns among patients seeking care at six level 1 hospitals during the pandemic. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, prognostic and epidemiological. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7893208 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78932082021-02-22 COVID-19 and trauma: how social distancing orders altered the patient population using trauma services during the 2020 pandemic Pelzl, Casey E Salottolo, Kristin Banton, Kaysie Madayag, Robert M Hamilton, David Duane, Therese M Carrick, Matthew Lieser, Mark Berg, Gina Bar-Or, David Trauma Surg Acute Care Open Original Research BACKGROUND: Recent studies have reported changes in trauma volumes resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic and social distancing orders (SDOs) implemented by federal and state governments. However, literature is lacking on demographic, injury and outcome patterns. METHODS: This retrospective, cross-sectional study included patients aged ≥18 years at six US level 1 trauma centers. Patients not discharged by the date of data acquisition were excluded. Demographic, injury and outcome variables were assessed across four time periods: period 1 (January 1, 2019–December 31, 2019); period 1b (March 16, 2019–June 30, 2019); period 2 (January 1, 2020–March 15, 2020); and period 3 (March 16, 2020–June 30, 2020). Patients admitted in period 3 were compared with patients presenting during all other periods. Categorical data were compared with χ(2) and Fisher’s exact tests, and continuous data were assessed with Student’s t-tests and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. RESULTS: We identified 18 567 patients: 12 797 patients in period 1 (including 3707 in period 1b), 2488 in period 2 and 3282 in period 3. Compared with period 1, period 3 had a statistically significant decrease in mean patient volume, increase in portion of penetrating injuries, increase in higher levels of trauma activation, change in emergency department discharge disposition locations, increase in in-hospital mortality and a shorter hospital length of stay. Comparison between period 1b and period 3 demonstrated a decrease in mean patient volume, increase in penetrating injuries, increase in high acuity trauma activations and increase in in-hospital mortality rate. From period 2 to period 3, the penetrating injuries rose from 6.7% to 9.4% (p=0.004), injury severity scale ≥25 increased from 5.9% to 7.7% (p=0.002), full trauma team activations increased from 13.7% to 16.4% (p<0.001), interhospital transfers decreased from 36.7% to 31.6% (p<0.001) and the in-hospital mortality rate increased from 3.3% to 4.2% (p=0.003). DISCUSSION: Beyond altering social interactions among people, the federal SDO is associated with changes in trauma volumes, demographics and injury patterns among patients seeking care at six level 1 hospitals during the pandemic. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, prognostic and epidemiological. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7893208/ /pubmed/34192163 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2020-000645 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Pelzl, Casey E Salottolo, Kristin Banton, Kaysie Madayag, Robert M Hamilton, David Duane, Therese M Carrick, Matthew Lieser, Mark Berg, Gina Bar-Or, David COVID-19 and trauma: how social distancing orders altered the patient population using trauma services during the 2020 pandemic |
title | COVID-19 and trauma: how social distancing orders altered the patient population using trauma services during the 2020 pandemic |
title_full | COVID-19 and trauma: how social distancing orders altered the patient population using trauma services during the 2020 pandemic |
title_fullStr | COVID-19 and trauma: how social distancing orders altered the patient population using trauma services during the 2020 pandemic |
title_full_unstemmed | COVID-19 and trauma: how social distancing orders altered the patient population using trauma services during the 2020 pandemic |
title_short | COVID-19 and trauma: how social distancing orders altered the patient population using trauma services during the 2020 pandemic |
title_sort | covid-19 and trauma: how social distancing orders altered the patient population using trauma services during the 2020 pandemic |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7893208/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34192163 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2020-000645 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pelzlcaseye covid19andtraumahowsocialdistancingordersalteredthepatientpopulationusingtraumaservicesduringthe2020pandemic AT salottolokristin covid19andtraumahowsocialdistancingordersalteredthepatientpopulationusingtraumaservicesduringthe2020pandemic AT bantonkaysie covid19andtraumahowsocialdistancingordersalteredthepatientpopulationusingtraumaservicesduringthe2020pandemic AT madayagrobertm covid19andtraumahowsocialdistancingordersalteredthepatientpopulationusingtraumaservicesduringthe2020pandemic AT hamiltondavid covid19andtraumahowsocialdistancingordersalteredthepatientpopulationusingtraumaservicesduringthe2020pandemic AT duanetheresem covid19andtraumahowsocialdistancingordersalteredthepatientpopulationusingtraumaservicesduringthe2020pandemic AT carrickmatthew covid19andtraumahowsocialdistancingordersalteredthepatientpopulationusingtraumaservicesduringthe2020pandemic AT liesermark covid19andtraumahowsocialdistancingordersalteredthepatientpopulationusingtraumaservicesduringthe2020pandemic AT berggina covid19andtraumahowsocialdistancingordersalteredthepatientpopulationusingtraumaservicesduringthe2020pandemic AT barordavid covid19andtraumahowsocialdistancingordersalteredthepatientpopulationusingtraumaservicesduringthe2020pandemic |