Cargando…
Acceptance of Vaginal Birth After Caesarean Section Trial in Shree Birendra Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study
INTRODUCTION: The rate of primary cesarean section is on the rising trend. Vaginal birth after cesarean section can be an alternative to reduce cesarean section worldwide. Antenatal examination and intrapartum monitoring are the most important factors for a vaginal birth after a cesarean section. Th...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Journal of the Nepal Medical Association
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7893396/ http://dx.doi.org/10.31729/jnma.5781 |
_version_ | 1783653040933306368 |
---|---|
author | Khatri, Ratna Adhikari Chand, Arju Thapa, Manish Thapa, Sumana Khadka, Shailaja |
author_facet | Khatri, Ratna Adhikari Chand, Arju Thapa, Manish Thapa, Sumana Khadka, Shailaja |
author_sort | Khatri, Ratna Adhikari |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The rate of primary cesarean section is on the rising trend. Vaginal birth after cesarean section can be an alternative to reduce cesarean section worldwide. Antenatal examination and intrapartum monitoring are the most important factors for a vaginal birth after a cesarean section. This study aims to determine the acceptance of vaginal birth after cesarean section trial in a tertiary care hospital in Nepal. METHODS: This is a descriptive cross-sectional study carried out in Shree Birendra Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal, from March 2019 to March 2020. All pregnant women with a previous history of cesarean section meeting Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynecology criteria were included. A trial of labor was conducted on the patients who accepted vaginal birth after cesarean section. RESULTS: A total of 85 cases with previous lower section cesarean section were included in the study. Out of which, 75 (88.2%) refused vaginal birth after cesarean section, and only 10 cases (11.8%) accepted to undergo a trial of labor. Five women (50%) had a successful vaginal birth. Complications were less among the vaginal birth after cesarean section group than the repeat cesarean section group. There was no maternal and neonatal mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The acceptance of vaginal birth after cesarean section is very low in this study. No complications were observed among vaginal birth after cesarean section in our study. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7893396 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Journal of the Nepal Medical Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78933962021-02-19 Acceptance of Vaginal Birth After Caesarean Section Trial in Shree Birendra Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study Khatri, Ratna Adhikari Chand, Arju Thapa, Manish Thapa, Sumana Khadka, Shailaja JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc Original Article INTRODUCTION: The rate of primary cesarean section is on the rising trend. Vaginal birth after cesarean section can be an alternative to reduce cesarean section worldwide. Antenatal examination and intrapartum monitoring are the most important factors for a vaginal birth after a cesarean section. This study aims to determine the acceptance of vaginal birth after cesarean section trial in a tertiary care hospital in Nepal. METHODS: This is a descriptive cross-sectional study carried out in Shree Birendra Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal, from March 2019 to March 2020. All pregnant women with a previous history of cesarean section meeting Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynecology criteria were included. A trial of labor was conducted on the patients who accepted vaginal birth after cesarean section. RESULTS: A total of 85 cases with previous lower section cesarean section were included in the study. Out of which, 75 (88.2%) refused vaginal birth after cesarean section, and only 10 cases (11.8%) accepted to undergo a trial of labor. Five women (50%) had a successful vaginal birth. Complications were less among the vaginal birth after cesarean section group than the repeat cesarean section group. There was no maternal and neonatal mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The acceptance of vaginal birth after cesarean section is very low in this study. No complications were observed among vaginal birth after cesarean section in our study. Journal of the Nepal Medical Association 2021-01 2021-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7893396/ http://dx.doi.org/10.31729/jnma.5781 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Khatri, Ratna Adhikari Chand, Arju Thapa, Manish Thapa, Sumana Khadka, Shailaja Acceptance of Vaginal Birth After Caesarean Section Trial in Shree Birendra Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study |
title | Acceptance of Vaginal Birth After Caesarean Section Trial in Shree Birendra Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study |
title_full | Acceptance of Vaginal Birth After Caesarean Section Trial in Shree Birendra Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study |
title_fullStr | Acceptance of Vaginal Birth After Caesarean Section Trial in Shree Birendra Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Acceptance of Vaginal Birth After Caesarean Section Trial in Shree Birendra Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study |
title_short | Acceptance of Vaginal Birth After Caesarean Section Trial in Shree Birendra Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study |
title_sort | acceptance of vaginal birth after caesarean section trial in shree birendra hospital, kathmandu, nepal: a descriptive cross-sectional study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7893396/ http://dx.doi.org/10.31729/jnma.5781 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT khatriratnaadhikari acceptanceofvaginalbirthaftercaesareansectiontrialinshreebirendrahospitalkathmandunepaladescriptivecrosssectionalstudy AT chandarju acceptanceofvaginalbirthaftercaesareansectiontrialinshreebirendrahospitalkathmandunepaladescriptivecrosssectionalstudy AT thapamanish acceptanceofvaginalbirthaftercaesareansectiontrialinshreebirendrahospitalkathmandunepaladescriptivecrosssectionalstudy AT thapasumana acceptanceofvaginalbirthaftercaesareansectiontrialinshreebirendrahospitalkathmandunepaladescriptivecrosssectionalstudy AT khadkashailaja acceptanceofvaginalbirthaftercaesareansectiontrialinshreebirendrahospitalkathmandunepaladescriptivecrosssectionalstudy |