Cargando…

Acceptance of Vaginal Birth After Caesarean Section Trial in Shree Birendra Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study

INTRODUCTION: The rate of primary cesarean section is on the rising trend. Vaginal birth after cesarean section can be an alternative to reduce cesarean section worldwide. Antenatal examination and intrapartum monitoring are the most important factors for a vaginal birth after a cesarean section. Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khatri, Ratna Adhikari, Chand, Arju, Thapa, Manish, Thapa, Sumana, Khadka, Shailaja
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Journal of the Nepal Medical Association 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7893396/
http://dx.doi.org/10.31729/jnma.5781
_version_ 1783653040933306368
author Khatri, Ratna Adhikari
Chand, Arju
Thapa, Manish
Thapa, Sumana
Khadka, Shailaja
author_facet Khatri, Ratna Adhikari
Chand, Arju
Thapa, Manish
Thapa, Sumana
Khadka, Shailaja
author_sort Khatri, Ratna Adhikari
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The rate of primary cesarean section is on the rising trend. Vaginal birth after cesarean section can be an alternative to reduce cesarean section worldwide. Antenatal examination and intrapartum monitoring are the most important factors for a vaginal birth after a cesarean section. This study aims to determine the acceptance of vaginal birth after cesarean section trial in a tertiary care hospital in Nepal. METHODS: This is a descriptive cross-sectional study carried out in Shree Birendra Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal, from March 2019 to March 2020. All pregnant women with a previous history of cesarean section meeting Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynecology criteria were included. A trial of labor was conducted on the patients who accepted vaginal birth after cesarean section. RESULTS: A total of 85 cases with previous lower section cesarean section were included in the study. Out of which, 75 (88.2%) refused vaginal birth after cesarean section, and only 10 cases (11.8%) accepted to undergo a trial of labor. Five women (50%) had a successful vaginal birth. Complications were less among the vaginal birth after cesarean section group than the repeat cesarean section group. There was no maternal and neonatal mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The acceptance of vaginal birth after cesarean section is very low in this study. No complications were observed among vaginal birth after cesarean section in our study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7893396
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Journal of the Nepal Medical Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78933962021-02-19 Acceptance of Vaginal Birth After Caesarean Section Trial in Shree Birendra Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study Khatri, Ratna Adhikari Chand, Arju Thapa, Manish Thapa, Sumana Khadka, Shailaja JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc Original Article INTRODUCTION: The rate of primary cesarean section is on the rising trend. Vaginal birth after cesarean section can be an alternative to reduce cesarean section worldwide. Antenatal examination and intrapartum monitoring are the most important factors for a vaginal birth after a cesarean section. This study aims to determine the acceptance of vaginal birth after cesarean section trial in a tertiary care hospital in Nepal. METHODS: This is a descriptive cross-sectional study carried out in Shree Birendra Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal, from March 2019 to March 2020. All pregnant women with a previous history of cesarean section meeting Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynecology criteria were included. A trial of labor was conducted on the patients who accepted vaginal birth after cesarean section. RESULTS: A total of 85 cases with previous lower section cesarean section were included in the study. Out of which, 75 (88.2%) refused vaginal birth after cesarean section, and only 10 cases (11.8%) accepted to undergo a trial of labor. Five women (50%) had a successful vaginal birth. Complications were less among the vaginal birth after cesarean section group than the repeat cesarean section group. There was no maternal and neonatal mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The acceptance of vaginal birth after cesarean section is very low in this study. No complications were observed among vaginal birth after cesarean section in our study. Journal of the Nepal Medical Association 2021-01 2021-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7893396/ http://dx.doi.org/10.31729/jnma.5781 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Khatri, Ratna Adhikari
Chand, Arju
Thapa, Manish
Thapa, Sumana
Khadka, Shailaja
Acceptance of Vaginal Birth After Caesarean Section Trial in Shree Birendra Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study
title Acceptance of Vaginal Birth After Caesarean Section Trial in Shree Birendra Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study
title_full Acceptance of Vaginal Birth After Caesarean Section Trial in Shree Birendra Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study
title_fullStr Acceptance of Vaginal Birth After Caesarean Section Trial in Shree Birendra Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study
title_full_unstemmed Acceptance of Vaginal Birth After Caesarean Section Trial in Shree Birendra Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study
title_short Acceptance of Vaginal Birth After Caesarean Section Trial in Shree Birendra Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study
title_sort acceptance of vaginal birth after caesarean section trial in shree birendra hospital, kathmandu, nepal: a descriptive cross-sectional study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7893396/
http://dx.doi.org/10.31729/jnma.5781
work_keys_str_mv AT khatriratnaadhikari acceptanceofvaginalbirthaftercaesareansectiontrialinshreebirendrahospitalkathmandunepaladescriptivecrosssectionalstudy
AT chandarju acceptanceofvaginalbirthaftercaesareansectiontrialinshreebirendrahospitalkathmandunepaladescriptivecrosssectionalstudy
AT thapamanish acceptanceofvaginalbirthaftercaesareansectiontrialinshreebirendrahospitalkathmandunepaladescriptivecrosssectionalstudy
AT thapasumana acceptanceofvaginalbirthaftercaesareansectiontrialinshreebirendrahospitalkathmandunepaladescriptivecrosssectionalstudy
AT khadkashailaja acceptanceofvaginalbirthaftercaesareansectiontrialinshreebirendrahospitalkathmandunepaladescriptivecrosssectionalstudy