Cargando…

Single-use negative-pressure wound therapy versus conventional dressings for closed surgical incisions: systematic literature review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Surgical-site complications (SSCs) remain a significant cause of morbidity and mortality, particularly in high-risk patients. The aim of this study was to determine whether prophylactic use of a specific single-use negative-pressure wound therapy (sNPWT) device reduced the incidence of S...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saunders, C, Nherera, L M, Horner, A, Trueman, P
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7893467/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33609382
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zraa003
_version_ 1783653056510951424
author Saunders, C
Nherera, L M
Horner, A
Trueman, P
author_facet Saunders, C
Nherera, L M
Horner, A
Trueman, P
author_sort Saunders, C
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Surgical-site complications (SSCs) remain a significant cause of morbidity and mortality, particularly in high-risk patients. The aim of this study was to determine whether prophylactic use of a specific single-use negative-pressure wound therapy (sNPWT) device reduced the incidence of SSCs after closed surgical incisions compared with conventional dressings. METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed using MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library to identify articles published from January 2011 to August 2018. RCTs and observational studies comparing PICO™ sNPWT with conventional dressings, with at least 10 patients in each treatment arm, were included. Meta-analyses were performed to determine odds ratios (ORs) or mean differences (MDs), as appropriate. PRISMA guidelines were followed. The primary outcome was surgical-site infection (SSI). Secondary outcomes were other SSCs and hospital efficiencies. Risk of bias was assessed. RESULTS: Of 6197 citations screened, 29 studies enrolling 5614 patients were included in the review; all studies included patients with risk factors for SSCs. sNPWT reduced the number of SSIs (OR 0.37, 95 per cent c.i. 0.28 to 0.50; number needed to treat (NNT) 20). sNPWT reduced the odds of wound dehiscence (OR 0.70, 0.53 to 0.92; NNT 26), seroma (OR 0.23, 0.11 to 0.45; NNT 13) and necrosis (OR 0.11, 0.03 to 0.39; NNT 12). Mean length of hospital stay was shorter in patients who underwent sNPWT (MD −1.75, 95 per cent c.i. −2.69 to −0.81). CONCLUSION: Use of the sNPWT device in patients with risk factors reduced the incidence of SSCs and the mean length of hospital stay.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7893467
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78934672021-02-24 Single-use negative-pressure wound therapy versus conventional dressings for closed surgical incisions: systematic literature review and meta-analysis Saunders, C Nherera, L M Horner, A Trueman, P BJS Open Systematic Review BACKGROUND: Surgical-site complications (SSCs) remain a significant cause of morbidity and mortality, particularly in high-risk patients. The aim of this study was to determine whether prophylactic use of a specific single-use negative-pressure wound therapy (sNPWT) device reduced the incidence of SSCs after closed surgical incisions compared with conventional dressings. METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed using MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library to identify articles published from January 2011 to August 2018. RCTs and observational studies comparing PICO™ sNPWT with conventional dressings, with at least 10 patients in each treatment arm, were included. Meta-analyses were performed to determine odds ratios (ORs) or mean differences (MDs), as appropriate. PRISMA guidelines were followed. The primary outcome was surgical-site infection (SSI). Secondary outcomes were other SSCs and hospital efficiencies. Risk of bias was assessed. RESULTS: Of 6197 citations screened, 29 studies enrolling 5614 patients were included in the review; all studies included patients with risk factors for SSCs. sNPWT reduced the number of SSIs (OR 0.37, 95 per cent c.i. 0.28 to 0.50; number needed to treat (NNT) 20). sNPWT reduced the odds of wound dehiscence (OR 0.70, 0.53 to 0.92; NNT 26), seroma (OR 0.23, 0.11 to 0.45; NNT 13) and necrosis (OR 0.11, 0.03 to 0.39; NNT 12). Mean length of hospital stay was shorter in patients who underwent sNPWT (MD −1.75, 95 per cent c.i. −2.69 to −0.81). CONCLUSION: Use of the sNPWT device in patients with risk factors reduced the incidence of SSCs and the mean length of hospital stay. Oxford University Press 2020-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7893467/ /pubmed/33609382 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zraa003 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS society Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Saunders, C
Nherera, L M
Horner, A
Trueman, P
Single-use negative-pressure wound therapy versus conventional dressings for closed surgical incisions: systematic literature review and meta-analysis
title Single-use negative-pressure wound therapy versus conventional dressings for closed surgical incisions: systematic literature review and meta-analysis
title_full Single-use negative-pressure wound therapy versus conventional dressings for closed surgical incisions: systematic literature review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Single-use negative-pressure wound therapy versus conventional dressings for closed surgical incisions: systematic literature review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Single-use negative-pressure wound therapy versus conventional dressings for closed surgical incisions: systematic literature review and meta-analysis
title_short Single-use negative-pressure wound therapy versus conventional dressings for closed surgical incisions: systematic literature review and meta-analysis
title_sort single-use negative-pressure wound therapy versus conventional dressings for closed surgical incisions: systematic literature review and meta-analysis
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7893467/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33609382
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zraa003
work_keys_str_mv AT saundersc singleusenegativepressurewoundtherapyversusconventionaldressingsforclosedsurgicalincisionssystematicliteraturereviewandmetaanalysis
AT nhereralm singleusenegativepressurewoundtherapyversusconventionaldressingsforclosedsurgicalincisionssystematicliteraturereviewandmetaanalysis
AT hornera singleusenegativepressurewoundtherapyversusconventionaldressingsforclosedsurgicalincisionssystematicliteraturereviewandmetaanalysis
AT truemanp singleusenegativepressurewoundtherapyversusconventionaldressingsforclosedsurgicalincisionssystematicliteraturereviewandmetaanalysis