Cargando…

The Risk of Penetration–Aspiration Related to Residue in the Pharynx

PURPOSE: Reference data from healthy adults under the age of 60 years suggest that the 75th and 95th percentiles for pharyngeal residue on swallows of thin liquids are 1% and 3%(C2-4)(2), respectively. We explored how pharyngeal residue below versus above these values prior to a swallow predicts pen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Steele, Catriona M., Peladeau-Pigeon, Melanie, Barrett, Emily, Wolkin, Talia S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7893525/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32598168
http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/2020_AJSLP-20-00042
_version_ 1783653066911776768
author Steele, Catriona M.
Peladeau-Pigeon, Melanie
Barrett, Emily
Wolkin, Talia S.
author_facet Steele, Catriona M.
Peladeau-Pigeon, Melanie
Barrett, Emily
Wolkin, Talia S.
author_sort Steele, Catriona M.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Reference data from healthy adults under the age of 60 years suggest that the 75th and 95th percentiles for pharyngeal residue on swallows of thin liquids are 1% and 3%(C2-4)(2), respectively. We explored how pharyngeal residue below versus above these values prior to a swallow predicts penetration–aspiration. METHOD: The study involved retrospective analysis of a previous research data set from 305 adults at risk for dysphagia. Participants swallowed six thin boluses and three each of mildly, moderately, and extremely thick barium in videofluoroscopy. Raters measured preswallow residue in %(C2-4)(2) units and Penetration–Aspiration Scale (PAS) scores for each swallow. Swallows were classified as (a) “clean baseline” (with no preswallow residue), (b) “clearing” swallows of residue with no new material added, or (c) swallows of “additional material” plus preswallow residue. Frequencies of PAS scores of ≥ 3 were compared across swallow type by consistency according to residue severity (i.e., ≤ vs. > 1%(C2-4)(2) and ≤ vs. > 3%(C2-4)(2). RESULTS: The data set comprised 2,541 clean baseline, 209 clearing, and 1,722 swallows of additional material. On clean baseline swallows, frequencies of PAS scores of ≥ 3 were 5% for thin and mildly thick liquids and 1% for moderately/extremely thick liquids. Compared to clean baseline swallows, the odds of penetration–aspiration on thin liquids increased 4.60-fold above the 1% threshold and 4.20-fold above the 3% threshold (mildly thick: 2.11-fold > 1%(C2-4)(2), 2.26-fold > 3%(C2-4)(2)). PAS scores of ≥ 3 did not occur with clearing swallows of moderately/extremely thick liquids. Lower frequencies of above-threshold preswallow residue were seen for swallows of additional material than for clearing swallows. Compared to clean baseline swallows, the odds of PAS scores of ≥ 3 on swallows of additional material increased ≥ 1.86-fold above the 1% threshold and ≥ 2.15-fold above the 3% threshold, depending on consistency. CONCLUSION: The data suggest that a pharyngeal residue threshold of 1%(C2-4)(2) is a meaningful cut-point for delineating increased risk of penetration–aspiration on a subsequent swallow.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7893525
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78935252021-03-01 The Risk of Penetration–Aspiration Related to Residue in the Pharynx Steele, Catriona M. Peladeau-Pigeon, Melanie Barrett, Emily Wolkin, Talia S. Am J Speech Lang Pathol Research Articles PURPOSE: Reference data from healthy adults under the age of 60 years suggest that the 75th and 95th percentiles for pharyngeal residue on swallows of thin liquids are 1% and 3%(C2-4)(2), respectively. We explored how pharyngeal residue below versus above these values prior to a swallow predicts penetration–aspiration. METHOD: The study involved retrospective analysis of a previous research data set from 305 adults at risk for dysphagia. Participants swallowed six thin boluses and three each of mildly, moderately, and extremely thick barium in videofluoroscopy. Raters measured preswallow residue in %(C2-4)(2) units and Penetration–Aspiration Scale (PAS) scores for each swallow. Swallows were classified as (a) “clean baseline” (with no preswallow residue), (b) “clearing” swallows of residue with no new material added, or (c) swallows of “additional material” plus preswallow residue. Frequencies of PAS scores of ≥ 3 were compared across swallow type by consistency according to residue severity (i.e., ≤ vs. > 1%(C2-4)(2) and ≤ vs. > 3%(C2-4)(2). RESULTS: The data set comprised 2,541 clean baseline, 209 clearing, and 1,722 swallows of additional material. On clean baseline swallows, frequencies of PAS scores of ≥ 3 were 5% for thin and mildly thick liquids and 1% for moderately/extremely thick liquids. Compared to clean baseline swallows, the odds of penetration–aspiration on thin liquids increased 4.60-fold above the 1% threshold and 4.20-fold above the 3% threshold (mildly thick: 2.11-fold > 1%(C2-4)(2), 2.26-fold > 3%(C2-4)(2)). PAS scores of ≥ 3 did not occur with clearing swallows of moderately/extremely thick liquids. Lower frequencies of above-threshold preswallow residue were seen for swallows of additional material than for clearing swallows. Compared to clean baseline swallows, the odds of PAS scores of ≥ 3 on swallows of additional material increased ≥ 1.86-fold above the 1% threshold and ≥ 2.15-fold above the 3% threshold, depending on consistency. CONCLUSION: The data suggest that a pharyngeal residue threshold of 1%(C2-4)(2) is a meaningful cut-point for delineating increased risk of penetration–aspiration on a subsequent swallow. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association 2020-08 2020-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7893525/ /pubmed/32598168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/2020_AJSLP-20-00042 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Articles
Steele, Catriona M.
Peladeau-Pigeon, Melanie
Barrett, Emily
Wolkin, Talia S.
The Risk of Penetration–Aspiration Related to Residue in the Pharynx
title The Risk of Penetration–Aspiration Related to Residue in the Pharynx
title_full The Risk of Penetration–Aspiration Related to Residue in the Pharynx
title_fullStr The Risk of Penetration–Aspiration Related to Residue in the Pharynx
title_full_unstemmed The Risk of Penetration–Aspiration Related to Residue in the Pharynx
title_short The Risk of Penetration–Aspiration Related to Residue in the Pharynx
title_sort risk of penetration–aspiration related to residue in the pharynx
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7893525/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32598168
http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/2020_AJSLP-20-00042
work_keys_str_mv AT steelecatrionam theriskofpenetrationaspirationrelatedtoresidueinthepharynx
AT peladeaupigeonmelanie theriskofpenetrationaspirationrelatedtoresidueinthepharynx
AT barrettemily theriskofpenetrationaspirationrelatedtoresidueinthepharynx
AT wolkintalias theriskofpenetrationaspirationrelatedtoresidueinthepharynx
AT steelecatrionam riskofpenetrationaspirationrelatedtoresidueinthepharynx
AT peladeaupigeonmelanie riskofpenetrationaspirationrelatedtoresidueinthepharynx
AT barrettemily riskofpenetrationaspirationrelatedtoresidueinthepharynx
AT wolkintalias riskofpenetrationaspirationrelatedtoresidueinthepharynx