Cargando…

Cepstral Peak Prominence Values for Clinical Voice Evaluation

PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to employ frequently used analysis methods and tasks to identify values for cepstral peak prominence (CPP) that can aid clinical voice evaluation. Experiment 1 identified CPP values to distinguish speakers with and without voice disorders. Experiment 2 was an init...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Murton, Olivia, Hillman, Robert, Mehta, Daryush
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7893528/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32658592
http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/2020_AJSLP-20-00001
_version_ 1783653067141414912
author Murton, Olivia
Hillman, Robert
Mehta, Daryush
author_facet Murton, Olivia
Hillman, Robert
Mehta, Daryush
author_sort Murton, Olivia
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to employ frequently used analysis methods and tasks to identify values for cepstral peak prominence (CPP) that can aid clinical voice evaluation. Experiment 1 identified CPP values to distinguish speakers with and without voice disorders. Experiment 2 was an initial attempt to estimate auditory-perceptual ratings of overall dysphonia severity using CPP values. METHOD: CPP was computed using the Analysis of Dysphonia in Speech and Voice (ADSV) program and Praat. Experiment 1 included recordings from 295 patients with medically diagnosed voice disorders and 50 vocally healthy control speakers. Speakers produced sustained /a/ vowels and the English language Rainbow Passage. CPP cutoff values that best distinguished patient and control speakers were identified. Experiment 2 analyzed recordings from 32 English speakers with varying dysphonia severity and provided preliminary validation of the Experiment 1 cutoffs. Speakers sustained the /a/ vowel and read four sentences from the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice protocol. Trained listeners provided auditory-perceptual ratings of overall dysphonia for the recordings, which were estimated using CPP values in a linear regression model whose performance was evaluated using the coefficient of determination (r (2)). RESULTS: Experiment 1 identified CPP cutoff values of 11.46 dB (ADSV) and 14.45 dB (Praat) for the sustained /a/ vowels and 6.11 dB (ADSV) and 9.33 dB (Praat) for the Rainbow Passage. CPP values below those thresholds indicated the presence of a voice disorder with up to 94.5% accuracy. In Experiment 2, CPP values estimated ratings of overall dysphonia with r (2) values up to .74. CONCLUSIONS: The CPP cutoff values identified in Experiment 1 provide normative reference points for clinical voice evaluation based on sustained /a/ vowels and the Rainbow Passage. Experiment 2 provides an initial predictive framework that can be used to relate CPP values to the auditory perception of overall dysphonia severity based on sustained /a/ vowels and Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice sentences.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7893528
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78935282021-03-01 Cepstral Peak Prominence Values for Clinical Voice Evaluation Murton, Olivia Hillman, Robert Mehta, Daryush Am J Speech Lang Pathol Research Articles PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to employ frequently used analysis methods and tasks to identify values for cepstral peak prominence (CPP) that can aid clinical voice evaluation. Experiment 1 identified CPP values to distinguish speakers with and without voice disorders. Experiment 2 was an initial attempt to estimate auditory-perceptual ratings of overall dysphonia severity using CPP values. METHOD: CPP was computed using the Analysis of Dysphonia in Speech and Voice (ADSV) program and Praat. Experiment 1 included recordings from 295 patients with medically diagnosed voice disorders and 50 vocally healthy control speakers. Speakers produced sustained /a/ vowels and the English language Rainbow Passage. CPP cutoff values that best distinguished patient and control speakers were identified. Experiment 2 analyzed recordings from 32 English speakers with varying dysphonia severity and provided preliminary validation of the Experiment 1 cutoffs. Speakers sustained the /a/ vowel and read four sentences from the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice protocol. Trained listeners provided auditory-perceptual ratings of overall dysphonia for the recordings, which were estimated using CPP values in a linear regression model whose performance was evaluated using the coefficient of determination (r (2)). RESULTS: Experiment 1 identified CPP cutoff values of 11.46 dB (ADSV) and 14.45 dB (Praat) for the sustained /a/ vowels and 6.11 dB (ADSV) and 9.33 dB (Praat) for the Rainbow Passage. CPP values below those thresholds indicated the presence of a voice disorder with up to 94.5% accuracy. In Experiment 2, CPP values estimated ratings of overall dysphonia with r (2) values up to .74. CONCLUSIONS: The CPP cutoff values identified in Experiment 1 provide normative reference points for clinical voice evaluation based on sustained /a/ vowels and the Rainbow Passage. Experiment 2 provides an initial predictive framework that can be used to relate CPP values to the auditory perception of overall dysphonia severity based on sustained /a/ vowels and Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice sentences. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association 2020-08 2020-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7893528/ /pubmed/32658592 http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/2020_AJSLP-20-00001 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Articles
Murton, Olivia
Hillman, Robert
Mehta, Daryush
Cepstral Peak Prominence Values for Clinical Voice Evaluation
title Cepstral Peak Prominence Values for Clinical Voice Evaluation
title_full Cepstral Peak Prominence Values for Clinical Voice Evaluation
title_fullStr Cepstral Peak Prominence Values for Clinical Voice Evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Cepstral Peak Prominence Values for Clinical Voice Evaluation
title_short Cepstral Peak Prominence Values for Clinical Voice Evaluation
title_sort cepstral peak prominence values for clinical voice evaluation
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7893528/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32658592
http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/2020_AJSLP-20-00001
work_keys_str_mv AT murtonolivia cepstralpeakprominencevaluesforclinicalvoiceevaluation
AT hillmanrobert cepstralpeakprominencevaluesforclinicalvoiceevaluation
AT mehtadaryush cepstralpeakprominencevaluesforclinicalvoiceevaluation