Cargando…
Population differences in vaccine responses (POPVAC): scientific rationale and cross-cutting analyses for three linked, randomised controlled trials assessing the role, reversibility and mediators of immunomodulation by chronic infections in the tropics
INTRODUCTION: Vaccine-specific immune responses vary between populations and are often impaired in low income, rural settings. Drivers of these differences are not fully elucidated, hampering identification of strategies for optimising vaccine effectiveness. We hypothesise that urban–rural (and regi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7893603/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33593767 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040425 |
_version_ | 1783653080014782464 |
---|---|
author | Nkurunungi, Gyaviira Zirimenya, Ludoviko Natukunda, Agnes Nassuuna, Jacent Oduru, Gloria Ninsiima, Caroline Zziwa, Christopher Akello, Florence Kizindo, Robert Akello, Mirriam Kaleebu, Pontiano Wajja, Anne Luzze, Henry Cose, Stephen Webb, Emily Elliott, Alison M |
author_facet | Nkurunungi, Gyaviira Zirimenya, Ludoviko Natukunda, Agnes Nassuuna, Jacent Oduru, Gloria Ninsiima, Caroline Zziwa, Christopher Akello, Florence Kizindo, Robert Akello, Mirriam Kaleebu, Pontiano Wajja, Anne Luzze, Henry Cose, Stephen Webb, Emily Elliott, Alison M |
author_sort | Nkurunungi, Gyaviira |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Vaccine-specific immune responses vary between populations and are often impaired in low income, rural settings. Drivers of these differences are not fully elucidated, hampering identification of strategies for optimising vaccine effectiveness. We hypothesise that urban–rural (and regional and international) differences in vaccine responses are mediated to an important extent by differential exposure to chronic infections, particularly parasitic infections. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Three related trials sharing core elements of study design and procedures (allowing comparison of outcomes across the trials) will test the effects of (1) individually randomised intervention against schistosomiasis (trial A) and malaria (trial B), and (2) Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) revaccination (trial C), on a common set of vaccine responses. We will enrol adolescents from Ugandan schools in rural high-schistosomiasis (trial A) and rural high-malaria (trial B) settings and from an established urban birth cohort (trial C). All participants will receive BCG on day ‘0’; yellow fever, oral typhoid and human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccines at week 4; and HPV and tetanus/diphtheria booster vaccine at week 28. Primary outcomes are BCG-specific IFN-γ responses (8 weeks after BCG) and for other vaccines, antibody responses to key vaccine antigens at 4 weeks after immunisation. Secondary analyses will determine effects of interventions on correlates of protective immunity, vaccine response waning, priming versus boosting immunisations, and parasite infection status and intensity. Overarching analyses will compare outcomes between the three trial settings. Sample archives will offer opportunities for exploratory evaluation of the role of immunological and ‘trans-kingdom’ mediators in parasite modulation of vaccine-specific responses. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval has been obtained from relevant Ugandan and UK ethics committees. Results will be shared with Uganda Ministry of Health, relevant district councils, community leaders and study participants. Further dissemination will be done through conference proceedings and publications. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: ISRCTN60517191, ISRCTN62041885, ISRCTN10482904. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7893603 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78936032021-03-03 Population differences in vaccine responses (POPVAC): scientific rationale and cross-cutting analyses for three linked, randomised controlled trials assessing the role, reversibility and mediators of immunomodulation by chronic infections in the tropics Nkurunungi, Gyaviira Zirimenya, Ludoviko Natukunda, Agnes Nassuuna, Jacent Oduru, Gloria Ninsiima, Caroline Zziwa, Christopher Akello, Florence Kizindo, Robert Akello, Mirriam Kaleebu, Pontiano Wajja, Anne Luzze, Henry Cose, Stephen Webb, Emily Elliott, Alison M BMJ Open Infectious Diseases INTRODUCTION: Vaccine-specific immune responses vary between populations and are often impaired in low income, rural settings. Drivers of these differences are not fully elucidated, hampering identification of strategies for optimising vaccine effectiveness. We hypothesise that urban–rural (and regional and international) differences in vaccine responses are mediated to an important extent by differential exposure to chronic infections, particularly parasitic infections. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Three related trials sharing core elements of study design and procedures (allowing comparison of outcomes across the trials) will test the effects of (1) individually randomised intervention against schistosomiasis (trial A) and malaria (trial B), and (2) Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) revaccination (trial C), on a common set of vaccine responses. We will enrol adolescents from Ugandan schools in rural high-schistosomiasis (trial A) and rural high-malaria (trial B) settings and from an established urban birth cohort (trial C). All participants will receive BCG on day ‘0’; yellow fever, oral typhoid and human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccines at week 4; and HPV and tetanus/diphtheria booster vaccine at week 28. Primary outcomes are BCG-specific IFN-γ responses (8 weeks after BCG) and for other vaccines, antibody responses to key vaccine antigens at 4 weeks after immunisation. Secondary analyses will determine effects of interventions on correlates of protective immunity, vaccine response waning, priming versus boosting immunisations, and parasite infection status and intensity. Overarching analyses will compare outcomes between the three trial settings. Sample archives will offer opportunities for exploratory evaluation of the role of immunological and ‘trans-kingdom’ mediators in parasite modulation of vaccine-specific responses. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval has been obtained from relevant Ugandan and UK ethics committees. Results will be shared with Uganda Ministry of Health, relevant district councils, community leaders and study participants. Further dissemination will be done through conference proceedings and publications. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: ISRCTN60517191, ISRCTN62041885, ISRCTN10482904. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7893603/ /pubmed/33593767 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040425 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Infectious Diseases Nkurunungi, Gyaviira Zirimenya, Ludoviko Natukunda, Agnes Nassuuna, Jacent Oduru, Gloria Ninsiima, Caroline Zziwa, Christopher Akello, Florence Kizindo, Robert Akello, Mirriam Kaleebu, Pontiano Wajja, Anne Luzze, Henry Cose, Stephen Webb, Emily Elliott, Alison M Population differences in vaccine responses (POPVAC): scientific rationale and cross-cutting analyses for three linked, randomised controlled trials assessing the role, reversibility and mediators of immunomodulation by chronic infections in the tropics |
title | Population differences in vaccine responses (POPVAC): scientific rationale and cross-cutting analyses for three linked, randomised controlled trials assessing the role, reversibility and mediators of immunomodulation by chronic infections in the tropics |
title_full | Population differences in vaccine responses (POPVAC): scientific rationale and cross-cutting analyses for three linked, randomised controlled trials assessing the role, reversibility and mediators of immunomodulation by chronic infections in the tropics |
title_fullStr | Population differences in vaccine responses (POPVAC): scientific rationale and cross-cutting analyses for three linked, randomised controlled trials assessing the role, reversibility and mediators of immunomodulation by chronic infections in the tropics |
title_full_unstemmed | Population differences in vaccine responses (POPVAC): scientific rationale and cross-cutting analyses for three linked, randomised controlled trials assessing the role, reversibility and mediators of immunomodulation by chronic infections in the tropics |
title_short | Population differences in vaccine responses (POPVAC): scientific rationale and cross-cutting analyses for three linked, randomised controlled trials assessing the role, reversibility and mediators of immunomodulation by chronic infections in the tropics |
title_sort | population differences in vaccine responses (popvac): scientific rationale and cross-cutting analyses for three linked, randomised controlled trials assessing the role, reversibility and mediators of immunomodulation by chronic infections in the tropics |
topic | Infectious Diseases |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7893603/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33593767 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040425 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nkurunungigyaviira populationdifferencesinvaccineresponsespopvacscientificrationaleandcrosscuttinganalysesforthreelinkedrandomisedcontrolledtrialsassessingtherolereversibilityandmediatorsofimmunomodulationbychronicinfectionsinthetropics AT zirimenyaludoviko populationdifferencesinvaccineresponsespopvacscientificrationaleandcrosscuttinganalysesforthreelinkedrandomisedcontrolledtrialsassessingtherolereversibilityandmediatorsofimmunomodulationbychronicinfectionsinthetropics AT natukundaagnes populationdifferencesinvaccineresponsespopvacscientificrationaleandcrosscuttinganalysesforthreelinkedrandomisedcontrolledtrialsassessingtherolereversibilityandmediatorsofimmunomodulationbychronicinfectionsinthetropics AT nassuunajacent populationdifferencesinvaccineresponsespopvacscientificrationaleandcrosscuttinganalysesforthreelinkedrandomisedcontrolledtrialsassessingtherolereversibilityandmediatorsofimmunomodulationbychronicinfectionsinthetropics AT odurugloria populationdifferencesinvaccineresponsespopvacscientificrationaleandcrosscuttinganalysesforthreelinkedrandomisedcontrolledtrialsassessingtherolereversibilityandmediatorsofimmunomodulationbychronicinfectionsinthetropics AT ninsiimacaroline populationdifferencesinvaccineresponsespopvacscientificrationaleandcrosscuttinganalysesforthreelinkedrandomisedcontrolledtrialsassessingtherolereversibilityandmediatorsofimmunomodulationbychronicinfectionsinthetropics AT zziwachristopher populationdifferencesinvaccineresponsespopvacscientificrationaleandcrosscuttinganalysesforthreelinkedrandomisedcontrolledtrialsassessingtherolereversibilityandmediatorsofimmunomodulationbychronicinfectionsinthetropics AT akelloflorence populationdifferencesinvaccineresponsespopvacscientificrationaleandcrosscuttinganalysesforthreelinkedrandomisedcontrolledtrialsassessingtherolereversibilityandmediatorsofimmunomodulationbychronicinfectionsinthetropics AT kizindorobert populationdifferencesinvaccineresponsespopvacscientificrationaleandcrosscuttinganalysesforthreelinkedrandomisedcontrolledtrialsassessingtherolereversibilityandmediatorsofimmunomodulationbychronicinfectionsinthetropics AT akellomirriam populationdifferencesinvaccineresponsespopvacscientificrationaleandcrosscuttinganalysesforthreelinkedrandomisedcontrolledtrialsassessingtherolereversibilityandmediatorsofimmunomodulationbychronicinfectionsinthetropics AT kaleebupontiano populationdifferencesinvaccineresponsespopvacscientificrationaleandcrosscuttinganalysesforthreelinkedrandomisedcontrolledtrialsassessingtherolereversibilityandmediatorsofimmunomodulationbychronicinfectionsinthetropics AT wajjaanne populationdifferencesinvaccineresponsespopvacscientificrationaleandcrosscuttinganalysesforthreelinkedrandomisedcontrolledtrialsassessingtherolereversibilityandmediatorsofimmunomodulationbychronicinfectionsinthetropics AT luzzehenry populationdifferencesinvaccineresponsespopvacscientificrationaleandcrosscuttinganalysesforthreelinkedrandomisedcontrolledtrialsassessingtherolereversibilityandmediatorsofimmunomodulationbychronicinfectionsinthetropics AT cosestephen populationdifferencesinvaccineresponsespopvacscientificrationaleandcrosscuttinganalysesforthreelinkedrandomisedcontrolledtrialsassessingtherolereversibilityandmediatorsofimmunomodulationbychronicinfectionsinthetropics AT webbemily populationdifferencesinvaccineresponsespopvacscientificrationaleandcrosscuttinganalysesforthreelinkedrandomisedcontrolledtrialsassessingtherolereversibilityandmediatorsofimmunomodulationbychronicinfectionsinthetropics AT elliottalisonm populationdifferencesinvaccineresponsespopvacscientificrationaleandcrosscuttinganalysesforthreelinkedrandomisedcontrolledtrialsassessingtherolereversibilityandmediatorsofimmunomodulationbychronicinfectionsinthetropics AT populationdifferencesinvaccineresponsespopvacscientificrationaleandcrosscuttinganalysesforthreelinkedrandomisedcontrolledtrialsassessingtherolereversibilityandmediatorsofimmunomodulationbychronicinfectionsinthetropics |