Cargando…

Population differences in vaccine responses (POPVAC): scientific rationale and cross-cutting analyses for three linked, randomised controlled trials assessing the role, reversibility and mediators of immunomodulation by chronic infections in the tropics

INTRODUCTION: Vaccine-specific immune responses vary between populations and are often impaired in low income, rural settings. Drivers of these differences are not fully elucidated, hampering identification of strategies for optimising vaccine effectiveness. We hypothesise that urban–rural (and regi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nkurunungi, Gyaviira, Zirimenya, Ludoviko, Natukunda, Agnes, Nassuuna, Jacent, Oduru, Gloria, Ninsiima, Caroline, Zziwa, Christopher, Akello, Florence, Kizindo, Robert, Akello, Mirriam, Kaleebu, Pontiano, Wajja, Anne, Luzze, Henry, Cose, Stephen, Webb, Emily, Elliott, Alison M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7893603/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33593767
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040425
_version_ 1783653080014782464
author Nkurunungi, Gyaviira
Zirimenya, Ludoviko
Natukunda, Agnes
Nassuuna, Jacent
Oduru, Gloria
Ninsiima, Caroline
Zziwa, Christopher
Akello, Florence
Kizindo, Robert
Akello, Mirriam
Kaleebu, Pontiano
Wajja, Anne
Luzze, Henry
Cose, Stephen
Webb, Emily
Elliott, Alison M
author_facet Nkurunungi, Gyaviira
Zirimenya, Ludoviko
Natukunda, Agnes
Nassuuna, Jacent
Oduru, Gloria
Ninsiima, Caroline
Zziwa, Christopher
Akello, Florence
Kizindo, Robert
Akello, Mirriam
Kaleebu, Pontiano
Wajja, Anne
Luzze, Henry
Cose, Stephen
Webb, Emily
Elliott, Alison M
author_sort Nkurunungi, Gyaviira
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Vaccine-specific immune responses vary between populations and are often impaired in low income, rural settings. Drivers of these differences are not fully elucidated, hampering identification of strategies for optimising vaccine effectiveness. We hypothesise that urban–rural (and regional and international) differences in vaccine responses are mediated to an important extent by differential exposure to chronic infections, particularly parasitic infections. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Three related trials sharing core elements of study design and procedures (allowing comparison of outcomes across the trials) will test the effects of (1) individually randomised intervention against schistosomiasis (trial A) and malaria (trial B), and (2) Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) revaccination (trial C), on a common set of vaccine responses. We will enrol adolescents from Ugandan schools in rural high-schistosomiasis (trial A) and rural high-malaria (trial B) settings and from an established urban birth cohort (trial C). All participants will receive BCG on day ‘0’; yellow fever, oral typhoid and human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccines at week 4; and HPV and tetanus/diphtheria booster vaccine at week 28. Primary outcomes are BCG-specific IFN-γ responses (8 weeks after BCG) and for other vaccines, antibody responses to key vaccine antigens at 4 weeks after immunisation. Secondary analyses will determine effects of interventions on correlates of protective immunity, vaccine response waning, priming versus boosting immunisations, and parasite infection status and intensity. Overarching analyses will compare outcomes between the three trial settings. Sample archives will offer opportunities for exploratory evaluation of the role of immunological and ‘trans-kingdom’ mediators in parasite modulation of vaccine-specific responses. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval has been obtained from relevant Ugandan and UK ethics committees. Results will be shared with Uganda Ministry of Health, relevant district councils, community leaders and study participants. Further dissemination will be done through conference proceedings and publications. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: ISRCTN60517191, ISRCTN62041885, ISRCTN10482904.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7893603
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78936032021-03-03 Population differences in vaccine responses (POPVAC): scientific rationale and cross-cutting analyses for three linked, randomised controlled trials assessing the role, reversibility and mediators of immunomodulation by chronic infections in the tropics Nkurunungi, Gyaviira Zirimenya, Ludoviko Natukunda, Agnes Nassuuna, Jacent Oduru, Gloria Ninsiima, Caroline Zziwa, Christopher Akello, Florence Kizindo, Robert Akello, Mirriam Kaleebu, Pontiano Wajja, Anne Luzze, Henry Cose, Stephen Webb, Emily Elliott, Alison M BMJ Open Infectious Diseases INTRODUCTION: Vaccine-specific immune responses vary between populations and are often impaired in low income, rural settings. Drivers of these differences are not fully elucidated, hampering identification of strategies for optimising vaccine effectiveness. We hypothesise that urban–rural (and regional and international) differences in vaccine responses are mediated to an important extent by differential exposure to chronic infections, particularly parasitic infections. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Three related trials sharing core elements of study design and procedures (allowing comparison of outcomes across the trials) will test the effects of (1) individually randomised intervention against schistosomiasis (trial A) and malaria (trial B), and (2) Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) revaccination (trial C), on a common set of vaccine responses. We will enrol adolescents from Ugandan schools in rural high-schistosomiasis (trial A) and rural high-malaria (trial B) settings and from an established urban birth cohort (trial C). All participants will receive BCG on day ‘0’; yellow fever, oral typhoid and human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccines at week 4; and HPV and tetanus/diphtheria booster vaccine at week 28. Primary outcomes are BCG-specific IFN-γ responses (8 weeks after BCG) and for other vaccines, antibody responses to key vaccine antigens at 4 weeks after immunisation. Secondary analyses will determine effects of interventions on correlates of protective immunity, vaccine response waning, priming versus boosting immunisations, and parasite infection status and intensity. Overarching analyses will compare outcomes between the three trial settings. Sample archives will offer opportunities for exploratory evaluation of the role of immunological and ‘trans-kingdom’ mediators in parasite modulation of vaccine-specific responses. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval has been obtained from relevant Ugandan and UK ethics committees. Results will be shared with Uganda Ministry of Health, relevant district councils, community leaders and study participants. Further dissemination will be done through conference proceedings and publications. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: ISRCTN60517191, ISRCTN62041885, ISRCTN10482904. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7893603/ /pubmed/33593767 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040425 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Infectious Diseases
Nkurunungi, Gyaviira
Zirimenya, Ludoviko
Natukunda, Agnes
Nassuuna, Jacent
Oduru, Gloria
Ninsiima, Caroline
Zziwa, Christopher
Akello, Florence
Kizindo, Robert
Akello, Mirriam
Kaleebu, Pontiano
Wajja, Anne
Luzze, Henry
Cose, Stephen
Webb, Emily
Elliott, Alison M
Population differences in vaccine responses (POPVAC): scientific rationale and cross-cutting analyses for three linked, randomised controlled trials assessing the role, reversibility and mediators of immunomodulation by chronic infections in the tropics
title Population differences in vaccine responses (POPVAC): scientific rationale and cross-cutting analyses for three linked, randomised controlled trials assessing the role, reversibility and mediators of immunomodulation by chronic infections in the tropics
title_full Population differences in vaccine responses (POPVAC): scientific rationale and cross-cutting analyses for three linked, randomised controlled trials assessing the role, reversibility and mediators of immunomodulation by chronic infections in the tropics
title_fullStr Population differences in vaccine responses (POPVAC): scientific rationale and cross-cutting analyses for three linked, randomised controlled trials assessing the role, reversibility and mediators of immunomodulation by chronic infections in the tropics
title_full_unstemmed Population differences in vaccine responses (POPVAC): scientific rationale and cross-cutting analyses for three linked, randomised controlled trials assessing the role, reversibility and mediators of immunomodulation by chronic infections in the tropics
title_short Population differences in vaccine responses (POPVAC): scientific rationale and cross-cutting analyses for three linked, randomised controlled trials assessing the role, reversibility and mediators of immunomodulation by chronic infections in the tropics
title_sort population differences in vaccine responses (popvac): scientific rationale and cross-cutting analyses for three linked, randomised controlled trials assessing the role, reversibility and mediators of immunomodulation by chronic infections in the tropics
topic Infectious Diseases
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7893603/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33593767
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040425
work_keys_str_mv AT nkurunungigyaviira populationdifferencesinvaccineresponsespopvacscientificrationaleandcrosscuttinganalysesforthreelinkedrandomisedcontrolledtrialsassessingtherolereversibilityandmediatorsofimmunomodulationbychronicinfectionsinthetropics
AT zirimenyaludoviko populationdifferencesinvaccineresponsespopvacscientificrationaleandcrosscuttinganalysesforthreelinkedrandomisedcontrolledtrialsassessingtherolereversibilityandmediatorsofimmunomodulationbychronicinfectionsinthetropics
AT natukundaagnes populationdifferencesinvaccineresponsespopvacscientificrationaleandcrosscuttinganalysesforthreelinkedrandomisedcontrolledtrialsassessingtherolereversibilityandmediatorsofimmunomodulationbychronicinfectionsinthetropics
AT nassuunajacent populationdifferencesinvaccineresponsespopvacscientificrationaleandcrosscuttinganalysesforthreelinkedrandomisedcontrolledtrialsassessingtherolereversibilityandmediatorsofimmunomodulationbychronicinfectionsinthetropics
AT odurugloria populationdifferencesinvaccineresponsespopvacscientificrationaleandcrosscuttinganalysesforthreelinkedrandomisedcontrolledtrialsassessingtherolereversibilityandmediatorsofimmunomodulationbychronicinfectionsinthetropics
AT ninsiimacaroline populationdifferencesinvaccineresponsespopvacscientificrationaleandcrosscuttinganalysesforthreelinkedrandomisedcontrolledtrialsassessingtherolereversibilityandmediatorsofimmunomodulationbychronicinfectionsinthetropics
AT zziwachristopher populationdifferencesinvaccineresponsespopvacscientificrationaleandcrosscuttinganalysesforthreelinkedrandomisedcontrolledtrialsassessingtherolereversibilityandmediatorsofimmunomodulationbychronicinfectionsinthetropics
AT akelloflorence populationdifferencesinvaccineresponsespopvacscientificrationaleandcrosscuttinganalysesforthreelinkedrandomisedcontrolledtrialsassessingtherolereversibilityandmediatorsofimmunomodulationbychronicinfectionsinthetropics
AT kizindorobert populationdifferencesinvaccineresponsespopvacscientificrationaleandcrosscuttinganalysesforthreelinkedrandomisedcontrolledtrialsassessingtherolereversibilityandmediatorsofimmunomodulationbychronicinfectionsinthetropics
AT akellomirriam populationdifferencesinvaccineresponsespopvacscientificrationaleandcrosscuttinganalysesforthreelinkedrandomisedcontrolledtrialsassessingtherolereversibilityandmediatorsofimmunomodulationbychronicinfectionsinthetropics
AT kaleebupontiano populationdifferencesinvaccineresponsespopvacscientificrationaleandcrosscuttinganalysesforthreelinkedrandomisedcontrolledtrialsassessingtherolereversibilityandmediatorsofimmunomodulationbychronicinfectionsinthetropics
AT wajjaanne populationdifferencesinvaccineresponsespopvacscientificrationaleandcrosscuttinganalysesforthreelinkedrandomisedcontrolledtrialsassessingtherolereversibilityandmediatorsofimmunomodulationbychronicinfectionsinthetropics
AT luzzehenry populationdifferencesinvaccineresponsespopvacscientificrationaleandcrosscuttinganalysesforthreelinkedrandomisedcontrolledtrialsassessingtherolereversibilityandmediatorsofimmunomodulationbychronicinfectionsinthetropics
AT cosestephen populationdifferencesinvaccineresponsespopvacscientificrationaleandcrosscuttinganalysesforthreelinkedrandomisedcontrolledtrialsassessingtherolereversibilityandmediatorsofimmunomodulationbychronicinfectionsinthetropics
AT webbemily populationdifferencesinvaccineresponsespopvacscientificrationaleandcrosscuttinganalysesforthreelinkedrandomisedcontrolledtrialsassessingtherolereversibilityandmediatorsofimmunomodulationbychronicinfectionsinthetropics
AT elliottalisonm populationdifferencesinvaccineresponsespopvacscientificrationaleandcrosscuttinganalysesforthreelinkedrandomisedcontrolledtrialsassessingtherolereversibilityandmediatorsofimmunomodulationbychronicinfectionsinthetropics
AT populationdifferencesinvaccineresponsespopvacscientificrationaleandcrosscuttinganalysesforthreelinkedrandomisedcontrolledtrialsassessingtherolereversibilityandmediatorsofimmunomodulationbychronicinfectionsinthetropics