Cargando…

Mediating effect of coping style on the relationship between clinical leadership and quality of work life among nurses in tertiary-level hospitals in China: a cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE: To explore the association between clinical leadership and quality of work life, as well as the mediating role of coping style in this relationship. SETTING: Three tertiary-level hospitals in Liaoning Province, China. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1209 nurses were recruited for this study. Reg...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Hongli, Chang, Hui, Tao, Zijun, Zhang, Dan, Shi, Ying, Li, Xiaofei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7893656/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33597134
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041862
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To explore the association between clinical leadership and quality of work life, as well as the mediating role of coping style in this relationship. SETTING: Three tertiary-level hospitals in Liaoning Province, China. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1209 nurses were recruited for this study. Registered nurses who work full time with at least 1 year of work experience were eligible as subjects. Exclusion criteria were nurses who work indirectly with patients, such as in education, administration or research. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Questionnaires consisting of the work-related Quality of Life Scale, the Nurse Leadership Scale and the Simplified Coping Style Questionnaire, as well as a demographic data sheet, were used to collect participant information. Pearson’s correlation analysis, hierarchical multiple regression analysis, and asymptotic and resampling strategies were used to analyse the data. RESULTS: The mean overall quality of work life score among Chinese nurses was 3.50±0.60. After adjusting for demographic characteristics, clinical leadership was positively associated with the score of quality of work life (β=0.55, p<0.01). Clinical leadership explained 27% of the variance in quality of work life. Coping style partially mediated the relationship between clinical leadership and quality of work life. The proportion of mediation of active coping was 21.82% and of passive coping was 5.79%. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical leadership was positively associated with quality of work life and coping style partially mediated the relationship between clinical leadership and quality of work life among nurses in China. Implementing measures focusing on both clinical leadership and coping style may provide success in improving the quality of work life of nurses.