Cargando…
Does the Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System improve patients’ outcome following laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer? A multicentre, retrospective analysis with propensity score matching
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the short-term and oncological impact of the Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System (ESSQS) by the Japan Society for Endoscopic Surgery on the operator performing laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was b...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7893747/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33608034 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-021-02155-z |
_version_ | 1783653108610498560 |
---|---|
author | Kazama, Keisuke Numata, Masakatsu Aoyama, Toru Atsumi, Yosuke Tamagawa, Hiroshi Godai, Teni Saeki, Hiroyuki Saigusa, Yusuke Shiozawa, Manabu Yukawa, Norio Masuda, Munetaka Rino, Yasushi |
author_facet | Kazama, Keisuke Numata, Masakatsu Aoyama, Toru Atsumi, Yosuke Tamagawa, Hiroshi Godai, Teni Saeki, Hiroyuki Saigusa, Yusuke Shiozawa, Manabu Yukawa, Norio Masuda, Munetaka Rino, Yasushi |
author_sort | Kazama, Keisuke |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the short-term and oncological impact of the Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System (ESSQS) by the Japan Society for Endoscopic Surgery on the operator performing laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was based on medical records from a multicentre database. A total of 417 patients diagnosed with stage II/III colon and rectosigmoid cancer treated with curative resection were divided into two groups according to whether they were operated on by qualified surgeons (Q group, n=352) or not (NQ group, n=65). Through strict propensity score matching, 98 cases (49 in each group) were assessed. RESULTS: Operative time was significantly longer in the NQ group than in the Q group (199 vs. 168 min, p=0.029). The amount of blood loss, post-operative complications, and duration of hospitalisation were similar between both groups. No mortality was observed. One conversion case was seen in the NQ group. The 3-year recurrence-free survival rate was 86.6% in the NQ group and 88.2% in the Q group, which was not statistically significant (log-rank p=0.966). CONCLUSION: Direct operation by ESSQS-qualified surgeons contributed to a shortened operation time. Under an organised educational environment, almost equivalent safety and oncological outcomes are expected regardless of the surgeon’s qualifications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7893747 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78937472021-02-22 Does the Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System improve patients’ outcome following laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer? A multicentre, retrospective analysis with propensity score matching Kazama, Keisuke Numata, Masakatsu Aoyama, Toru Atsumi, Yosuke Tamagawa, Hiroshi Godai, Teni Saeki, Hiroyuki Saigusa, Yusuke Shiozawa, Manabu Yukawa, Norio Masuda, Munetaka Rino, Yasushi World J Surg Oncol Research BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the short-term and oncological impact of the Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System (ESSQS) by the Japan Society for Endoscopic Surgery on the operator performing laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was based on medical records from a multicentre database. A total of 417 patients diagnosed with stage II/III colon and rectosigmoid cancer treated with curative resection were divided into two groups according to whether they were operated on by qualified surgeons (Q group, n=352) or not (NQ group, n=65). Through strict propensity score matching, 98 cases (49 in each group) were assessed. RESULTS: Operative time was significantly longer in the NQ group than in the Q group (199 vs. 168 min, p=0.029). The amount of blood loss, post-operative complications, and duration of hospitalisation were similar between both groups. No mortality was observed. One conversion case was seen in the NQ group. The 3-year recurrence-free survival rate was 86.6% in the NQ group and 88.2% in the Q group, which was not statistically significant (log-rank p=0.966). CONCLUSION: Direct operation by ESSQS-qualified surgeons contributed to a shortened operation time. Under an organised educational environment, almost equivalent safety and oncological outcomes are expected regardless of the surgeon’s qualifications. BioMed Central 2021-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7893747/ /pubmed/33608034 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-021-02155-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Kazama, Keisuke Numata, Masakatsu Aoyama, Toru Atsumi, Yosuke Tamagawa, Hiroshi Godai, Teni Saeki, Hiroyuki Saigusa, Yusuke Shiozawa, Manabu Yukawa, Norio Masuda, Munetaka Rino, Yasushi Does the Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System improve patients’ outcome following laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer? A multicentre, retrospective analysis with propensity score matching |
title | Does the Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System improve patients’ outcome following laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer? A multicentre, retrospective analysis with propensity score matching |
title_full | Does the Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System improve patients’ outcome following laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer? A multicentre, retrospective analysis with propensity score matching |
title_fullStr | Does the Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System improve patients’ outcome following laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer? A multicentre, retrospective analysis with propensity score matching |
title_full_unstemmed | Does the Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System improve patients’ outcome following laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer? A multicentre, retrospective analysis with propensity score matching |
title_short | Does the Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System improve patients’ outcome following laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer? A multicentre, retrospective analysis with propensity score matching |
title_sort | does the endoscopic surgical skill qualification system improve patients’ outcome following laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer? a multicentre, retrospective analysis with propensity score matching |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7893747/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33608034 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-021-02155-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kazamakeisuke doestheendoscopicsurgicalskillqualificationsystemimprovepatientsoutcomefollowinglaparoscopicsurgeryforcoloncanceramulticentreretrospectiveanalysiswithpropensityscorematching AT numatamasakatsu doestheendoscopicsurgicalskillqualificationsystemimprovepatientsoutcomefollowinglaparoscopicsurgeryforcoloncanceramulticentreretrospectiveanalysiswithpropensityscorematching AT aoyamatoru doestheendoscopicsurgicalskillqualificationsystemimprovepatientsoutcomefollowinglaparoscopicsurgeryforcoloncanceramulticentreretrospectiveanalysiswithpropensityscorematching AT atsumiyosuke doestheendoscopicsurgicalskillqualificationsystemimprovepatientsoutcomefollowinglaparoscopicsurgeryforcoloncanceramulticentreretrospectiveanalysiswithpropensityscorematching AT tamagawahiroshi doestheendoscopicsurgicalskillqualificationsystemimprovepatientsoutcomefollowinglaparoscopicsurgeryforcoloncanceramulticentreretrospectiveanalysiswithpropensityscorematching AT godaiteni doestheendoscopicsurgicalskillqualificationsystemimprovepatientsoutcomefollowinglaparoscopicsurgeryforcoloncanceramulticentreretrospectiveanalysiswithpropensityscorematching AT saekihiroyuki doestheendoscopicsurgicalskillqualificationsystemimprovepatientsoutcomefollowinglaparoscopicsurgeryforcoloncanceramulticentreretrospectiveanalysiswithpropensityscorematching AT saigusayusuke doestheendoscopicsurgicalskillqualificationsystemimprovepatientsoutcomefollowinglaparoscopicsurgeryforcoloncanceramulticentreretrospectiveanalysiswithpropensityscorematching AT shiozawamanabu doestheendoscopicsurgicalskillqualificationsystemimprovepatientsoutcomefollowinglaparoscopicsurgeryforcoloncanceramulticentreretrospectiveanalysiswithpropensityscorematching AT yukawanorio doestheendoscopicsurgicalskillqualificationsystemimprovepatientsoutcomefollowinglaparoscopicsurgeryforcoloncanceramulticentreretrospectiveanalysiswithpropensityscorematching AT masudamunetaka doestheendoscopicsurgicalskillqualificationsystemimprovepatientsoutcomefollowinglaparoscopicsurgeryforcoloncanceramulticentreretrospectiveanalysiswithpropensityscorematching AT rinoyasushi doestheendoscopicsurgicalskillqualificationsystemimprovepatientsoutcomefollowinglaparoscopicsurgeryforcoloncanceramulticentreretrospectiveanalysiswithpropensityscorematching |