Cargando…

Validation study of a novel approach for assessment of retronasal olfactory function with combination of odor thresholds and identification

PURPOSE: The present study aimed to establish a test battery for the clinical assessment of retronasal odor thresholds and retronasal odor identification. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective case–control series. METHODS: Sixty participants (36 women, 24 men, mean age 37.6 ± 19.4 years) were enrolled in this s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yoshino, Ayaho, Pellegrino, Robert, Luckett, Curtis R., Hummel, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7893845/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33606083
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-021-06687-8
_version_ 1783653129051439104
author Yoshino, Ayaho
Pellegrino, Robert
Luckett, Curtis R.
Hummel, Thomas
author_facet Yoshino, Ayaho
Pellegrino, Robert
Luckett, Curtis R.
Hummel, Thomas
author_sort Yoshino, Ayaho
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The present study aimed to establish a test battery for the clinical assessment of retronasal odor thresholds and retronasal odor identification. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective case–control series. METHODS: Sixty participants (36 women, 24 men, mean age 37.6 ± 19.4 years) were enrolled in this study; 36 were healthy controls and 24 were patients with olfactory dysfunction. Orthonasal olfactory function was assessed with the “Sniffin’ Sticks” test battery. Retronasal olfaction was assessed with oral odorant delivery using special containers for threshold function, and with oral tasteless powders for odor identification. RESULTS: Retronasal and orthonasal olfaction were significantly correlated for threshold scores, identification score, and the sum of threshold and identification score (TI score). Validity analyses showed that the retronasal TI score was able to discriminate between healthy controls and patients with olfactory dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: Normosmic participants can be distinctly differentiated from patients with olfactory dysfunction using a valid test battery comprised of retronasal threshold and identification tests. Based on the current findings, we advocate a TI score of 16 as a cut-off between patients and controls. Therefore, TI scores of 17 and above would indicate retronasal normosmia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7893845
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78938452021-02-22 Validation study of a novel approach for assessment of retronasal olfactory function with combination of odor thresholds and identification Yoshino, Ayaho Pellegrino, Robert Luckett, Curtis R. Hummel, Thomas Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Rhinology PURPOSE: The present study aimed to establish a test battery for the clinical assessment of retronasal odor thresholds and retronasal odor identification. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective case–control series. METHODS: Sixty participants (36 women, 24 men, mean age 37.6 ± 19.4 years) were enrolled in this study; 36 were healthy controls and 24 were patients with olfactory dysfunction. Orthonasal olfactory function was assessed with the “Sniffin’ Sticks” test battery. Retronasal olfaction was assessed with oral odorant delivery using special containers for threshold function, and with oral tasteless powders for odor identification. RESULTS: Retronasal and orthonasal olfaction were significantly correlated for threshold scores, identification score, and the sum of threshold and identification score (TI score). Validity analyses showed that the retronasal TI score was able to discriminate between healthy controls and patients with olfactory dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: Normosmic participants can be distinctly differentiated from patients with olfactory dysfunction using a valid test battery comprised of retronasal threshold and identification tests. Based on the current findings, we advocate a TI score of 16 as a cut-off between patients and controls. Therefore, TI scores of 17 and above would indicate retronasal normosmia. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-02-19 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7893845/ /pubmed/33606083 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-021-06687-8 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE part of Springer Nature 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Rhinology
Yoshino, Ayaho
Pellegrino, Robert
Luckett, Curtis R.
Hummel, Thomas
Validation study of a novel approach for assessment of retronasal olfactory function with combination of odor thresholds and identification
title Validation study of a novel approach for assessment of retronasal olfactory function with combination of odor thresholds and identification
title_full Validation study of a novel approach for assessment of retronasal olfactory function with combination of odor thresholds and identification
title_fullStr Validation study of a novel approach for assessment of retronasal olfactory function with combination of odor thresholds and identification
title_full_unstemmed Validation study of a novel approach for assessment of retronasal olfactory function with combination of odor thresholds and identification
title_short Validation study of a novel approach for assessment of retronasal olfactory function with combination of odor thresholds and identification
title_sort validation study of a novel approach for assessment of retronasal olfactory function with combination of odor thresholds and identification
topic Rhinology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7893845/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33606083
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-021-06687-8
work_keys_str_mv AT yoshinoayaho validationstudyofanovelapproachforassessmentofretronasalolfactoryfunctionwithcombinationofodorthresholdsandidentification
AT pellegrinorobert validationstudyofanovelapproachforassessmentofretronasalolfactoryfunctionwithcombinationofodorthresholdsandidentification
AT luckettcurtisr validationstudyofanovelapproachforassessmentofretronasalolfactoryfunctionwithcombinationofodorthresholdsandidentification
AT hummelthomas validationstudyofanovelapproachforassessmentofretronasalolfactoryfunctionwithcombinationofodorthresholdsandidentification