Cargando…

Prognostic significance of pretreatment controlling nutritional status score in urological cancers: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

BACKGROUND: Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score is a novel nutrition-based biomarker that has been reported for predicting survival in various cancers. However, the relationship between CONUT score and prognosis of urological cancers remains unclear. Hence, we performed this meta-analysis t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Niu, Xinhao, Zhu, Zhe, Bao, Juan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7893866/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33608012
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12935-021-01813-2
_version_ 1783653133034979328
author Niu, Xinhao
Zhu, Zhe
Bao, Juan
author_facet Niu, Xinhao
Zhu, Zhe
Bao, Juan
author_sort Niu, Xinhao
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score is a novel nutrition-based biomarker that has been reported for predicting survival in various cancers. However, the relationship between CONUT score and prognosis of urological cancers remains unclear. Hence, we performed this meta-analysis to evaluate the prognostic significance of CONUT score for patients with urological cancers. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) were systematically searched up to October 2020. The pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to evaluate the association of CONUT score with overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and recurrence/disease/progress-free survival (RFS/DFS/PFS) in urological cancers. RESULTS: A total of 12 articles with 13 studies were included in the analysis. Pooled results indicated that increased CONUT score predicted poor OS (HR: 1.78, 95% CI 1.51–2.09, p < 0.001), CSS (HR: 2.14, 95% CI 1.55–2.97, p < 0.001) and RFS/DFS/PFS (HR: 1.57, 95% CI 1.35–1.84, p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis by cancer type revealed that high CONUT score associated with worse OS in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and urothelial cancer (UC) (HR: 3.05, 95% CI 2.07–4.50, p < 0.001; HR: 1.58, 95% CI 1.32–1.89, p < 0.001). Similar results could be found in CSS (RCC HR: 2.67, 95% CI 1.87–3.81, p < 0.011; UC HR: 1.68, 95% CI 1.09–2.59, p = 0.011) and in RFS/DFS/PFS (RCC HR: 1.96, 95% CI 1.44–2.66, p < 0.001; UC HR: 1.42, 95% CI 1.18–1.71, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These results illustrated that the high CONUT score may predict worse survival for patients suffering from urological cancers. Therefore, the CONUT score may represent an effective prognostic indicator in urological cancers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7893866
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78938662021-02-22 Prognostic significance of pretreatment controlling nutritional status score in urological cancers: a systematic review and meta‐analysis Niu, Xinhao Zhu, Zhe Bao, Juan Cancer Cell Int Review BACKGROUND: Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score is a novel nutrition-based biomarker that has been reported for predicting survival in various cancers. However, the relationship between CONUT score and prognosis of urological cancers remains unclear. Hence, we performed this meta-analysis to evaluate the prognostic significance of CONUT score for patients with urological cancers. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) were systematically searched up to October 2020. The pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to evaluate the association of CONUT score with overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and recurrence/disease/progress-free survival (RFS/DFS/PFS) in urological cancers. RESULTS: A total of 12 articles with 13 studies were included in the analysis. Pooled results indicated that increased CONUT score predicted poor OS (HR: 1.78, 95% CI 1.51–2.09, p < 0.001), CSS (HR: 2.14, 95% CI 1.55–2.97, p < 0.001) and RFS/DFS/PFS (HR: 1.57, 95% CI 1.35–1.84, p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis by cancer type revealed that high CONUT score associated with worse OS in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and urothelial cancer (UC) (HR: 3.05, 95% CI 2.07–4.50, p < 0.001; HR: 1.58, 95% CI 1.32–1.89, p < 0.001). Similar results could be found in CSS (RCC HR: 2.67, 95% CI 1.87–3.81, p < 0.011; UC HR: 1.68, 95% CI 1.09–2.59, p = 0.011) and in RFS/DFS/PFS (RCC HR: 1.96, 95% CI 1.44–2.66, p < 0.001; UC HR: 1.42, 95% CI 1.18–1.71, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These results illustrated that the high CONUT score may predict worse survival for patients suffering from urological cancers. Therefore, the CONUT score may represent an effective prognostic indicator in urological cancers. BioMed Central 2021-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7893866/ /pubmed/33608012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12935-021-01813-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Niu, Xinhao
Zhu, Zhe
Bao, Juan
Prognostic significance of pretreatment controlling nutritional status score in urological cancers: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
title Prognostic significance of pretreatment controlling nutritional status score in urological cancers: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full Prognostic significance of pretreatment controlling nutritional status score in urological cancers: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_fullStr Prognostic significance of pretreatment controlling nutritional status score in urological cancers: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic significance of pretreatment controlling nutritional status score in urological cancers: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_short Prognostic significance of pretreatment controlling nutritional status score in urological cancers: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_sort prognostic significance of pretreatment controlling nutritional status score in urological cancers: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7893866/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33608012
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12935-021-01813-2
work_keys_str_mv AT niuxinhao prognosticsignificanceofpretreatmentcontrollingnutritionalstatusscoreinurologicalcancersasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhuzhe prognosticsignificanceofpretreatmentcontrollingnutritionalstatusscoreinurologicalcancersasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT baojuan prognosticsignificanceofpretreatmentcontrollingnutritionalstatusscoreinurologicalcancersasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis