Cargando…

Risk stratification for the prognosis of patients with chemoresistant urothelial cancer treated with pembrolizumab

The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors to treat urothelial carcinoma (UC) is increasing rapidly without clear guidance for validated risk stratification. This multicenter retrospective study collected clinicopathological information on 463 patients, and 11 predefined variables were analyzed to deve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kobayashi, Takashi, Ito, Katsuhiro, Kojima, Takahiro, Kato, Minoru, Kanda, Souhei, Hatakeyama, Shingo, Matsui, Yoshiyuki, Matsushita, Yuto, Naito, Sei, Shiga, Masanobu, Miyake, Makito, Muro, Yusuke, Nakanishi, Shotaro, Kato, Yoichiro, Shibuya, Tadamasa, Hayashi, Tetsutaro, Yasumoto, Hiroaki, Yoshida, Takashi, Uemura, Motohide, Taoka, Rikiya, Kamiyama, Manabu, Ogawa, Osamu, Kitamura, Hiroshi, Nishiyama, Hiroyuki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7893997/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33283385
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cas.14762
_version_ 1783653160955412480
author Kobayashi, Takashi
Ito, Katsuhiro
Kojima, Takahiro
Kato, Minoru
Kanda, Souhei
Hatakeyama, Shingo
Matsui, Yoshiyuki
Matsushita, Yuto
Naito, Sei
Shiga, Masanobu
Miyake, Makito
Muro, Yusuke
Nakanishi, Shotaro
Kato, Yoichiro
Shibuya, Tadamasa
Hayashi, Tetsutaro
Yasumoto, Hiroaki
Yoshida, Takashi
Uemura, Motohide
Taoka, Rikiya
Kamiyama, Manabu
Ogawa, Osamu
Kitamura, Hiroshi
Nishiyama, Hiroyuki
author_facet Kobayashi, Takashi
Ito, Katsuhiro
Kojima, Takahiro
Kato, Minoru
Kanda, Souhei
Hatakeyama, Shingo
Matsui, Yoshiyuki
Matsushita, Yuto
Naito, Sei
Shiga, Masanobu
Miyake, Makito
Muro, Yusuke
Nakanishi, Shotaro
Kato, Yoichiro
Shibuya, Tadamasa
Hayashi, Tetsutaro
Yasumoto, Hiroaki
Yoshida, Takashi
Uemura, Motohide
Taoka, Rikiya
Kamiyama, Manabu
Ogawa, Osamu
Kitamura, Hiroshi
Nishiyama, Hiroyuki
author_sort Kobayashi, Takashi
collection PubMed
description The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors to treat urothelial carcinoma (UC) is increasing rapidly without clear guidance for validated risk stratification. This multicenter retrospective study collected clinicopathological information on 463 patients, and 11 predefined variables were analyzed to develop a multivariate model predicting overall survival (OS). The model was validated using an independent dataset of 292 patients. Patient characteristics and outcomes were well balanced between the discovery and validation cohorts, which had median OS times of 10.2 and 12.5 mo, respectively. The final validated multivariate model was defined by risk scores based on the hazard ratios (HRs) of independent prognostic factors including performance status, site of metastasis, hemoglobin levels, and the neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio. The median OS times (95% confidence intervals [CIs]) for the low‐, intermediate‐, and high‐risk groups (discovery cohort) were not yet reached (NYR) (NYR–19.1), 6.8 mo (5.8‐8.9), and 2.3 mo (1.2‐2.6), respectively. The HRs (95% CI) for OS in the low‐ and intermediate‐risk groups vs the high‐risk group were 0.07 (0.04‐0.11) and 0.23 (0.15‐0.37), respectively. The objective response rates for in the low‐, intermediate‐, and high‐risk groups were 48.3%, 28.8%, and 10.5%, respectively. These differential outcomes were well reproduced in the validation cohort and in patients who received pembrolizumab after perioperative or first‐line chemotherapy (N = 584). In conclusion, the present study developed and validated a simple prognostic model predicting the oncological outcomes of pembrolizumab‐treated patients with chemoresistant UC. The model provides useful information for external validation, patient counseling, and clinical trial design.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7893997
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78939972021-03-02 Risk stratification for the prognosis of patients with chemoresistant urothelial cancer treated with pembrolizumab Kobayashi, Takashi Ito, Katsuhiro Kojima, Takahiro Kato, Minoru Kanda, Souhei Hatakeyama, Shingo Matsui, Yoshiyuki Matsushita, Yuto Naito, Sei Shiga, Masanobu Miyake, Makito Muro, Yusuke Nakanishi, Shotaro Kato, Yoichiro Shibuya, Tadamasa Hayashi, Tetsutaro Yasumoto, Hiroaki Yoshida, Takashi Uemura, Motohide Taoka, Rikiya Kamiyama, Manabu Ogawa, Osamu Kitamura, Hiroshi Nishiyama, Hiroyuki Cancer Sci Original Articles The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors to treat urothelial carcinoma (UC) is increasing rapidly without clear guidance for validated risk stratification. This multicenter retrospective study collected clinicopathological information on 463 patients, and 11 predefined variables were analyzed to develop a multivariate model predicting overall survival (OS). The model was validated using an independent dataset of 292 patients. Patient characteristics and outcomes were well balanced between the discovery and validation cohorts, which had median OS times of 10.2 and 12.5 mo, respectively. The final validated multivariate model was defined by risk scores based on the hazard ratios (HRs) of independent prognostic factors including performance status, site of metastasis, hemoglobin levels, and the neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio. The median OS times (95% confidence intervals [CIs]) for the low‐, intermediate‐, and high‐risk groups (discovery cohort) were not yet reached (NYR) (NYR–19.1), 6.8 mo (5.8‐8.9), and 2.3 mo (1.2‐2.6), respectively. The HRs (95% CI) for OS in the low‐ and intermediate‐risk groups vs the high‐risk group were 0.07 (0.04‐0.11) and 0.23 (0.15‐0.37), respectively. The objective response rates for in the low‐, intermediate‐, and high‐risk groups were 48.3%, 28.8%, and 10.5%, respectively. These differential outcomes were well reproduced in the validation cohort and in patients who received pembrolizumab after perioperative or first‐line chemotherapy (N = 584). In conclusion, the present study developed and validated a simple prognostic model predicting the oncological outcomes of pembrolizumab‐treated patients with chemoresistant UC. The model provides useful information for external validation, patient counseling, and clinical trial design. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-12-21 2021-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7893997/ /pubmed/33283385 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cas.14762 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Kobayashi, Takashi
Ito, Katsuhiro
Kojima, Takahiro
Kato, Minoru
Kanda, Souhei
Hatakeyama, Shingo
Matsui, Yoshiyuki
Matsushita, Yuto
Naito, Sei
Shiga, Masanobu
Miyake, Makito
Muro, Yusuke
Nakanishi, Shotaro
Kato, Yoichiro
Shibuya, Tadamasa
Hayashi, Tetsutaro
Yasumoto, Hiroaki
Yoshida, Takashi
Uemura, Motohide
Taoka, Rikiya
Kamiyama, Manabu
Ogawa, Osamu
Kitamura, Hiroshi
Nishiyama, Hiroyuki
Risk stratification for the prognosis of patients with chemoresistant urothelial cancer treated with pembrolizumab
title Risk stratification for the prognosis of patients with chemoresistant urothelial cancer treated with pembrolizumab
title_full Risk stratification for the prognosis of patients with chemoresistant urothelial cancer treated with pembrolizumab
title_fullStr Risk stratification for the prognosis of patients with chemoresistant urothelial cancer treated with pembrolizumab
title_full_unstemmed Risk stratification for the prognosis of patients with chemoresistant urothelial cancer treated with pembrolizumab
title_short Risk stratification for the prognosis of patients with chemoresistant urothelial cancer treated with pembrolizumab
title_sort risk stratification for the prognosis of patients with chemoresistant urothelial cancer treated with pembrolizumab
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7893997/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33283385
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cas.14762
work_keys_str_mv AT kobayashitakashi riskstratificationfortheprognosisofpatientswithchemoresistanturothelialcancertreatedwithpembrolizumab
AT itokatsuhiro riskstratificationfortheprognosisofpatientswithchemoresistanturothelialcancertreatedwithpembrolizumab
AT kojimatakahiro riskstratificationfortheprognosisofpatientswithchemoresistanturothelialcancertreatedwithpembrolizumab
AT katominoru riskstratificationfortheprognosisofpatientswithchemoresistanturothelialcancertreatedwithpembrolizumab
AT kandasouhei riskstratificationfortheprognosisofpatientswithchemoresistanturothelialcancertreatedwithpembrolizumab
AT hatakeyamashingo riskstratificationfortheprognosisofpatientswithchemoresistanturothelialcancertreatedwithpembrolizumab
AT matsuiyoshiyuki riskstratificationfortheprognosisofpatientswithchemoresistanturothelialcancertreatedwithpembrolizumab
AT matsushitayuto riskstratificationfortheprognosisofpatientswithchemoresistanturothelialcancertreatedwithpembrolizumab
AT naitosei riskstratificationfortheprognosisofpatientswithchemoresistanturothelialcancertreatedwithpembrolizumab
AT shigamasanobu riskstratificationfortheprognosisofpatientswithchemoresistanturothelialcancertreatedwithpembrolizumab
AT miyakemakito riskstratificationfortheprognosisofpatientswithchemoresistanturothelialcancertreatedwithpembrolizumab
AT muroyusuke riskstratificationfortheprognosisofpatientswithchemoresistanturothelialcancertreatedwithpembrolizumab
AT nakanishishotaro riskstratificationfortheprognosisofpatientswithchemoresistanturothelialcancertreatedwithpembrolizumab
AT katoyoichiro riskstratificationfortheprognosisofpatientswithchemoresistanturothelialcancertreatedwithpembrolizumab
AT shibuyatadamasa riskstratificationfortheprognosisofpatientswithchemoresistanturothelialcancertreatedwithpembrolizumab
AT hayashitetsutaro riskstratificationfortheprognosisofpatientswithchemoresistanturothelialcancertreatedwithpembrolizumab
AT yasumotohiroaki riskstratificationfortheprognosisofpatientswithchemoresistanturothelialcancertreatedwithpembrolizumab
AT yoshidatakashi riskstratificationfortheprognosisofpatientswithchemoresistanturothelialcancertreatedwithpembrolizumab
AT uemuramotohide riskstratificationfortheprognosisofpatientswithchemoresistanturothelialcancertreatedwithpembrolizumab
AT taokarikiya riskstratificationfortheprognosisofpatientswithchemoresistanturothelialcancertreatedwithpembrolizumab
AT kamiyamamanabu riskstratificationfortheprognosisofpatientswithchemoresistanturothelialcancertreatedwithpembrolizumab
AT ogawaosamu riskstratificationfortheprognosisofpatientswithchemoresistanturothelialcancertreatedwithpembrolizumab
AT kitamurahiroshi riskstratificationfortheprognosisofpatientswithchemoresistanturothelialcancertreatedwithpembrolizumab
AT nishiyamahiroyuki riskstratificationfortheprognosisofpatientswithchemoresistanturothelialcancertreatedwithpembrolizumab
AT riskstratificationfortheprognosisofpatientswithchemoresistanturothelialcancertreatedwithpembrolizumab