Cargando…
Multiple mutations within individual oncogenes
Recent studies of the cancer genome have identified numerous patients harboring multiple mutations (MM) within individual oncogenes. These MM (de novo MM) in cis synergistically activate the mutated oncogene and promote tumorigenesis, indicating a positive epistatic interaction between mutations. Th...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7894016/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33073435 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cas.14699 |
_version_ | 1783653165465337856 |
---|---|
author | Saito, Yuki Koya, Junji Kataoka, Keisuke |
author_facet | Saito, Yuki Koya, Junji Kataoka, Keisuke |
author_sort | Saito, Yuki |
collection | PubMed |
description | Recent studies of the cancer genome have identified numerous patients harboring multiple mutations (MM) within individual oncogenes. These MM (de novo MM) in cis synergistically activate the mutated oncogene and promote tumorigenesis, indicating a positive epistatic interaction between mutations. The relatively frequent de novo MM suggest that intramolecular positive epistasis is widespread in oncogenes. Studies also suggest that negative and higher‐order epistasis affects de novo MM. Comparison of de novo MM and MM associated with drug‐resistant secondary mutations (secondary MM) revealed several similarities with respect to allelic configuration, mutational selection and functionality of individual mutations. Conversely, they have several differences, most notably the difference in drug sensitivities. Secondary MM usually confer resistance to molecularly targeted therapies, whereas several de novo MM are associated with increased sensitivity, implying that both can be useful as therapeutic biomarkers. Unlike secondary MM in which specific secondary resistant mutations are selected, minor (infrequent) functionally weak mutations are convergently selected in de novo MM, which may provide an explanation as to why such mutations accumulate in cancer. The third type of MM is MM from different subclones. This type of MM is associated with parallel evolution, which may contribute to relapse and treatment failure. Collectively, MM within individual oncogenes are diverse, but all types of MM are associated with cancer evolution and therapeutic response. Further evaluation of oncogenic MM is warranted to gain a deeper understanding of cancer genetics and evolution. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7894016 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78940162021-03-02 Multiple mutations within individual oncogenes Saito, Yuki Koya, Junji Kataoka, Keisuke Cancer Sci Review Articles Recent studies of the cancer genome have identified numerous patients harboring multiple mutations (MM) within individual oncogenes. These MM (de novo MM) in cis synergistically activate the mutated oncogene and promote tumorigenesis, indicating a positive epistatic interaction between mutations. The relatively frequent de novo MM suggest that intramolecular positive epistasis is widespread in oncogenes. Studies also suggest that negative and higher‐order epistasis affects de novo MM. Comparison of de novo MM and MM associated with drug‐resistant secondary mutations (secondary MM) revealed several similarities with respect to allelic configuration, mutational selection and functionality of individual mutations. Conversely, they have several differences, most notably the difference in drug sensitivities. Secondary MM usually confer resistance to molecularly targeted therapies, whereas several de novo MM are associated with increased sensitivity, implying that both can be useful as therapeutic biomarkers. Unlike secondary MM in which specific secondary resistant mutations are selected, minor (infrequent) functionally weak mutations are convergently selected in de novo MM, which may provide an explanation as to why such mutations accumulate in cancer. The third type of MM is MM from different subclones. This type of MM is associated with parallel evolution, which may contribute to relapse and treatment failure. Collectively, MM within individual oncogenes are diverse, but all types of MM are associated with cancer evolution and therapeutic response. Further evaluation of oncogenic MM is warranted to gain a deeper understanding of cancer genetics and evolution. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-01-11 2021-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7894016/ /pubmed/33073435 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cas.14699 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Review Articles Saito, Yuki Koya, Junji Kataoka, Keisuke Multiple mutations within individual oncogenes |
title | Multiple mutations within individual oncogenes |
title_full | Multiple mutations within individual oncogenes |
title_fullStr | Multiple mutations within individual oncogenes |
title_full_unstemmed | Multiple mutations within individual oncogenes |
title_short | Multiple mutations within individual oncogenes |
title_sort | multiple mutations within individual oncogenes |
topic | Review Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7894016/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33073435 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cas.14699 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT saitoyuki multiplemutationswithinindividualoncogenes AT koyajunji multiplemutationswithinindividualoncogenes AT kataokakeisuke multiplemutationswithinindividualoncogenes |