Cargando…

Delivering Virtual Cancer Rehabilitation Programming During the First 90 Days of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Multimethod Study

OBJECTIVE: To describe the adaptations made to implement virtual cancer rehabilitation at the onset of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, as well as understand the experiences of patients and providers adapting to virtual care. DESIGN: Multimethod study. SETTING: Cancer center. PARTICIPANTS: A t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lopez, Christian J., Edwards, Beth, Langelier, David M., Chang, Eugene K., Chafranskaia, Aleksandra, Jones, Jennifer M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7894071/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33617864
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2021.02.002
_version_ 1783653170104238080
author Lopez, Christian J.
Edwards, Beth
Langelier, David M.
Chang, Eugene K.
Chafranskaia, Aleksandra
Jones, Jennifer M.
author_facet Lopez, Christian J.
Edwards, Beth
Langelier, David M.
Chang, Eugene K.
Chafranskaia, Aleksandra
Jones, Jennifer M.
author_sort Lopez, Christian J.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To describe the adaptations made to implement virtual cancer rehabilitation at the onset of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, as well as understand the experiences of patients and providers adapting to virtual care. DESIGN: Multimethod study. SETTING: Cancer center. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1968 virtual patient visits were completed during the study period. Adult survivors of cancer (n=12) and oncology health care providers (n=12) participated in semi-structured interviews. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Framework-driven categorization of program modifications, qualitative interviews with patients and providers, and a comparison of process outcomes with the previous 90 days of in-person care via referrals, completed visits and attendance, method of delivery, weekly capacities, and wait times. RESULTS: The majority of program visits could be adapted to virtual delivery, with format, setting, and content modifications. Virtual care demonstrated an increase or maintenance in the number of completed visits by appointment type compared with in-person care, with attendance ranging from 80%-93%. For most appointment types, capacities increased, whereas wait times decreased slightly. Overall, 168 patients (11% of all assessments and follow-ups) assessed virtually were identified by providers as requiring an in-person appointment because of reassessment of musculoskeletal and/or neurologic impairment (n=109, 65%) and lymphedema (n=59, 35%). The interviews (n=24) revealed that virtual care was an acceptable alternative in some circumstances, with the ability to (1) increase access to care; (2) provide a sense of reassurance during a time of isolation; and (3) provide confidence in learning skills to self-manage impairments. CONCLUSIONS: Many appointments can be successfully adapted to virtual formats to deliver cancer rehabilitation programming. Based on our findings, we provide practical recommendations that can be implemented by providers and programs to facilitate the adoption and delivery of virtual care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7894071
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78940712021-02-22 Delivering Virtual Cancer Rehabilitation Programming During the First 90 Days of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Multimethod Study Lopez, Christian J. Edwards, Beth Langelier, David M. Chang, Eugene K. Chafranskaia, Aleksandra Jones, Jennifer M. Arch Phys Med Rehabil Original Research OBJECTIVE: To describe the adaptations made to implement virtual cancer rehabilitation at the onset of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, as well as understand the experiences of patients and providers adapting to virtual care. DESIGN: Multimethod study. SETTING: Cancer center. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1968 virtual patient visits were completed during the study period. Adult survivors of cancer (n=12) and oncology health care providers (n=12) participated in semi-structured interviews. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Framework-driven categorization of program modifications, qualitative interviews with patients and providers, and a comparison of process outcomes with the previous 90 days of in-person care via referrals, completed visits and attendance, method of delivery, weekly capacities, and wait times. RESULTS: The majority of program visits could be adapted to virtual delivery, with format, setting, and content modifications. Virtual care demonstrated an increase or maintenance in the number of completed visits by appointment type compared with in-person care, with attendance ranging from 80%-93%. For most appointment types, capacities increased, whereas wait times decreased slightly. Overall, 168 patients (11% of all assessments and follow-ups) assessed virtually were identified by providers as requiring an in-person appointment because of reassessment of musculoskeletal and/or neurologic impairment (n=109, 65%) and lymphedema (n=59, 35%). The interviews (n=24) revealed that virtual care was an acceptable alternative in some circumstances, with the ability to (1) increase access to care; (2) provide a sense of reassurance during a time of isolation; and (3) provide confidence in learning skills to self-manage impairments. CONCLUSIONS: Many appointments can be successfully adapted to virtual formats to deliver cancer rehabilitation programming. Based on our findings, we provide practical recommendations that can be implemented by providers and programs to facilitate the adoption and delivery of virtual care. by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. 2021-07 2021-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7894071/ /pubmed/33617864 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2021.02.002 Text en © 2021 The Authors Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Original Research
Lopez, Christian J.
Edwards, Beth
Langelier, David M.
Chang, Eugene K.
Chafranskaia, Aleksandra
Jones, Jennifer M.
Delivering Virtual Cancer Rehabilitation Programming During the First 90 Days of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Multimethod Study
title Delivering Virtual Cancer Rehabilitation Programming During the First 90 Days of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Multimethod Study
title_full Delivering Virtual Cancer Rehabilitation Programming During the First 90 Days of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Multimethod Study
title_fullStr Delivering Virtual Cancer Rehabilitation Programming During the First 90 Days of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Multimethod Study
title_full_unstemmed Delivering Virtual Cancer Rehabilitation Programming During the First 90 Days of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Multimethod Study
title_short Delivering Virtual Cancer Rehabilitation Programming During the First 90 Days of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Multimethod Study
title_sort delivering virtual cancer rehabilitation programming during the first 90 days of the covid-19 pandemic: a multimethod study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7894071/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33617864
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2021.02.002
work_keys_str_mv AT lopezchristianj deliveringvirtualcancerrehabilitationprogrammingduringthefirst90daysofthecovid19pandemicamultimethodstudy
AT edwardsbeth deliveringvirtualcancerrehabilitationprogrammingduringthefirst90daysofthecovid19pandemicamultimethodstudy
AT langelierdavidm deliveringvirtualcancerrehabilitationprogrammingduringthefirst90daysofthecovid19pandemicamultimethodstudy
AT changeugenek deliveringvirtualcancerrehabilitationprogrammingduringthefirst90daysofthecovid19pandemicamultimethodstudy
AT chafranskaiaaleksandra deliveringvirtualcancerrehabilitationprogrammingduringthefirst90daysofthecovid19pandemicamultimethodstudy
AT jonesjenniferm deliveringvirtualcancerrehabilitationprogrammingduringthefirst90daysofthecovid19pandemicamultimethodstudy