Cargando…

Simple method to distinguish the type of fetal premature contraction using arterial Doppler time interval measurements

AIM: The purpose of this study was to establish a simple method to distinguish premature ventricular contractions (PVC) from premature atrial contractions (PAC) using a fetal Doppler ultrasound arterial pulse waveform to measure time intervals between sinus node restarting. METHODS: We retrospective...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Teramachi, Yozo, Maeno, Yasuki, Hirose, Akiko, Horinouchi, Takashi, Kozuma, Yutaka, Yoshizato, Toshiyuki, Suda, Kenji
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7894151/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33164296
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jog.14563
_version_ 1783653187624894464
author Teramachi, Yozo
Maeno, Yasuki
Hirose, Akiko
Horinouchi, Takashi
Kozuma, Yutaka
Yoshizato, Toshiyuki
Suda, Kenji
author_facet Teramachi, Yozo
Maeno, Yasuki
Hirose, Akiko
Horinouchi, Takashi
Kozuma, Yutaka
Yoshizato, Toshiyuki
Suda, Kenji
author_sort Teramachi, Yozo
collection PubMed
description AIM: The purpose of this study was to establish a simple method to distinguish premature ventricular contractions (PVC) from premature atrial contractions (PAC) using a fetal Doppler ultrasound arterial pulse waveform to measure time intervals between sinus node restarting. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 14 fetuses with premature contraction (8 with PAC, 6 with PVC). We measured two distinct parts of time intervals using an arterial pulsed‐wave Doppler: the two consecutive waveforms just before the premature contraction (2‐V interval) and two consecutive waveforms including the premature contraction (XV interval) to measure time intervals between sinus node restarting. We then evaluated the time difference between the 2‐V and XV intervals in PVC compared to PAC. RESULTS: For PVC, the difference between the 2‐V interval and the XV interval was significantly shorter than that for PAC. A cut‐off point of 33 ms, where a difference ≤33 ms was clearly shown to be associated with a PVC and a difference more than 33 ms signified a PAC was demonstrated. CONCLUSION: The 2‐V and XV interval measurements, used to measure time intervals between sinus node restarting, could easily distinguish PVC from PAC in utero. Therefore, this study could potentially be a feasible and effective method for obstetricians or sonographers to employ usefully.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7894151
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78941512021-03-02 Simple method to distinguish the type of fetal premature contraction using arterial Doppler time interval measurements Teramachi, Yozo Maeno, Yasuki Hirose, Akiko Horinouchi, Takashi Kozuma, Yutaka Yoshizato, Toshiyuki Suda, Kenji J Obstet Gynaecol Res Original Articles AIM: The purpose of this study was to establish a simple method to distinguish premature ventricular contractions (PVC) from premature atrial contractions (PAC) using a fetal Doppler ultrasound arterial pulse waveform to measure time intervals between sinus node restarting. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 14 fetuses with premature contraction (8 with PAC, 6 with PVC). We measured two distinct parts of time intervals using an arterial pulsed‐wave Doppler: the two consecutive waveforms just before the premature contraction (2‐V interval) and two consecutive waveforms including the premature contraction (XV interval) to measure time intervals between sinus node restarting. We then evaluated the time difference between the 2‐V and XV intervals in PVC compared to PAC. RESULTS: For PVC, the difference between the 2‐V interval and the XV interval was significantly shorter than that for PAC. A cut‐off point of 33 ms, where a difference ≤33 ms was clearly shown to be associated with a PVC and a difference more than 33 ms signified a PAC was demonstrated. CONCLUSION: The 2‐V and XV interval measurements, used to measure time intervals between sinus node restarting, could easily distinguish PVC from PAC in utero. Therefore, this study could potentially be a feasible and effective method for obstetricians or sonographers to employ usefully. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2020-11-08 2021-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7894151/ /pubmed/33164296 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jog.14563 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Teramachi, Yozo
Maeno, Yasuki
Hirose, Akiko
Horinouchi, Takashi
Kozuma, Yutaka
Yoshizato, Toshiyuki
Suda, Kenji
Simple method to distinguish the type of fetal premature contraction using arterial Doppler time interval measurements
title Simple method to distinguish the type of fetal premature contraction using arterial Doppler time interval measurements
title_full Simple method to distinguish the type of fetal premature contraction using arterial Doppler time interval measurements
title_fullStr Simple method to distinguish the type of fetal premature contraction using arterial Doppler time interval measurements
title_full_unstemmed Simple method to distinguish the type of fetal premature contraction using arterial Doppler time interval measurements
title_short Simple method to distinguish the type of fetal premature contraction using arterial Doppler time interval measurements
title_sort simple method to distinguish the type of fetal premature contraction using arterial doppler time interval measurements
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7894151/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33164296
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jog.14563
work_keys_str_mv AT teramachiyozo simplemethodtodistinguishthetypeoffetalprematurecontractionusingarterialdopplertimeintervalmeasurements
AT maenoyasuki simplemethodtodistinguishthetypeoffetalprematurecontractionusingarterialdopplertimeintervalmeasurements
AT hiroseakiko simplemethodtodistinguishthetypeoffetalprematurecontractionusingarterialdopplertimeintervalmeasurements
AT horinouchitakashi simplemethodtodistinguishthetypeoffetalprematurecontractionusingarterialdopplertimeintervalmeasurements
AT kozumayutaka simplemethodtodistinguishthetypeoffetalprematurecontractionusingarterialdopplertimeintervalmeasurements
AT yoshizatotoshiyuki simplemethodtodistinguishthetypeoffetalprematurecontractionusingarterialdopplertimeintervalmeasurements
AT sudakenji simplemethodtodistinguishthetypeoffetalprematurecontractionusingarterialdopplertimeintervalmeasurements