Cargando…

Multi‐hypothesis comparison of Farquhar and Collatz photosynthesis models reveals the unexpected influence of empirical assumptions at leaf and global scales

Mechanistic photosynthesis models are at the heart of terrestrial biosphere models (TBMs) simulating the daily, monthly, annual and decadal rhythms of carbon assimilation (A). These models are founded on robust mathematical hypotheses that describe how A responds to changes in light and atmospheric...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Walker, Anthony P., Johnson, Abbey L., Rogers, Alistair, Anderson, Jeremiah, Bridges, Robert A., Fisher, Rosie A., Lu, Dan, Ricciuto, Daniel M., Serbin, Shawn P., Ye, Ming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7894311/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33037690
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15366
_version_ 1783653223814397952
author Walker, Anthony P.
Johnson, Abbey L.
Rogers, Alistair
Anderson, Jeremiah
Bridges, Robert A.
Fisher, Rosie A.
Lu, Dan
Ricciuto, Daniel M.
Serbin, Shawn P.
Ye, Ming
author_facet Walker, Anthony P.
Johnson, Abbey L.
Rogers, Alistair
Anderson, Jeremiah
Bridges, Robert A.
Fisher, Rosie A.
Lu, Dan
Ricciuto, Daniel M.
Serbin, Shawn P.
Ye, Ming
author_sort Walker, Anthony P.
collection PubMed
description Mechanistic photosynthesis models are at the heart of terrestrial biosphere models (TBMs) simulating the daily, monthly, annual and decadal rhythms of carbon assimilation (A). These models are founded on robust mathematical hypotheses that describe how A responds to changes in light and atmospheric CO(2) concentration. Two predominant photosynthesis models are in common usage: Farquhar (FvCB) and Collatz (CBGB). However, a detailed quantitative comparison of these two models has never been undertaken. In this study, we unify the FvCB and CBGB models to a common parameter set and use novel multi‐hypothesis methods (that account for both hypothesis and parameter variability) for process‐level sensitivity analysis. These models represent three key biological processes: carboxylation, electron transport, triose phosphate use (TPU) and an additional model process: limiting‐rate selection. Each of the four processes comprises 1–3 alternative hypotheses giving 12 possible individual models with a total of 14 parameters. To broaden inference, TBM simulations were run and novel, high‐resolution photosynthesis measurements were made. We show that parameters associated with carboxylation are the most influential parameters but also reveal the surprising and marked dominance of the limiting‐rate selection process (accounting for 57% of the variation in A vs. 22% for carboxylation). The limiting‐rate selection assumption proposed by CBGB smooths the transition between limiting rates and always reduces A below the minimum of all potentially limiting rates, by up to 25%, effectively imposing a fourth limitation on A. Evaluation of the CBGB smoothing function in three TBMs demonstrated a reduction in global A by 4%–10%, equivalent to 50%–160% of current annual fossil fuel emissions. This analysis reveals a surprising and previously unquantified influence of a process that has been integral to many TBMs for decades, highlighting the value of multi‐hypothesis methods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7894311
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78943112021-03-02 Multi‐hypothesis comparison of Farquhar and Collatz photosynthesis models reveals the unexpected influence of empirical assumptions at leaf and global scales Walker, Anthony P. Johnson, Abbey L. Rogers, Alistair Anderson, Jeremiah Bridges, Robert A. Fisher, Rosie A. Lu, Dan Ricciuto, Daniel M. Serbin, Shawn P. Ye, Ming Glob Chang Biol Primary Research Articles Mechanistic photosynthesis models are at the heart of terrestrial biosphere models (TBMs) simulating the daily, monthly, annual and decadal rhythms of carbon assimilation (A). These models are founded on robust mathematical hypotheses that describe how A responds to changes in light and atmospheric CO(2) concentration. Two predominant photosynthesis models are in common usage: Farquhar (FvCB) and Collatz (CBGB). However, a detailed quantitative comparison of these two models has never been undertaken. In this study, we unify the FvCB and CBGB models to a common parameter set and use novel multi‐hypothesis methods (that account for both hypothesis and parameter variability) for process‐level sensitivity analysis. These models represent three key biological processes: carboxylation, electron transport, triose phosphate use (TPU) and an additional model process: limiting‐rate selection. Each of the four processes comprises 1–3 alternative hypotheses giving 12 possible individual models with a total of 14 parameters. To broaden inference, TBM simulations were run and novel, high‐resolution photosynthesis measurements were made. We show that parameters associated with carboxylation are the most influential parameters but also reveal the surprising and marked dominance of the limiting‐rate selection process (accounting for 57% of the variation in A vs. 22% for carboxylation). The limiting‐rate selection assumption proposed by CBGB smooths the transition between limiting rates and always reduces A below the minimum of all potentially limiting rates, by up to 25%, effectively imposing a fourth limitation on A. Evaluation of the CBGB smoothing function in three TBMs demonstrated a reduction in global A by 4%–10%, equivalent to 50%–160% of current annual fossil fuel emissions. This analysis reveals a surprising and previously unquantified influence of a process that has been integral to many TBMs for decades, highlighting the value of multi‐hypothesis methods. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-10-31 2021-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7894311/ /pubmed/33037690 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15366 Text en © 2020 UT-Battelle, LLC. Global Change Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Primary Research Articles
Walker, Anthony P.
Johnson, Abbey L.
Rogers, Alistair
Anderson, Jeremiah
Bridges, Robert A.
Fisher, Rosie A.
Lu, Dan
Ricciuto, Daniel M.
Serbin, Shawn P.
Ye, Ming
Multi‐hypothesis comparison of Farquhar and Collatz photosynthesis models reveals the unexpected influence of empirical assumptions at leaf and global scales
title Multi‐hypothesis comparison of Farquhar and Collatz photosynthesis models reveals the unexpected influence of empirical assumptions at leaf and global scales
title_full Multi‐hypothesis comparison of Farquhar and Collatz photosynthesis models reveals the unexpected influence of empirical assumptions at leaf and global scales
title_fullStr Multi‐hypothesis comparison of Farquhar and Collatz photosynthesis models reveals the unexpected influence of empirical assumptions at leaf and global scales
title_full_unstemmed Multi‐hypothesis comparison of Farquhar and Collatz photosynthesis models reveals the unexpected influence of empirical assumptions at leaf and global scales
title_short Multi‐hypothesis comparison of Farquhar and Collatz photosynthesis models reveals the unexpected influence of empirical assumptions at leaf and global scales
title_sort multi‐hypothesis comparison of farquhar and collatz photosynthesis models reveals the unexpected influence of empirical assumptions at leaf and global scales
topic Primary Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7894311/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33037690
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15366
work_keys_str_mv AT walkeranthonyp multihypothesiscomparisonoffarquharandcollatzphotosynthesismodelsrevealstheunexpectedinfluenceofempiricalassumptionsatleafandglobalscales
AT johnsonabbeyl multihypothesiscomparisonoffarquharandcollatzphotosynthesismodelsrevealstheunexpectedinfluenceofempiricalassumptionsatleafandglobalscales
AT rogersalistair multihypothesiscomparisonoffarquharandcollatzphotosynthesismodelsrevealstheunexpectedinfluenceofempiricalassumptionsatleafandglobalscales
AT andersonjeremiah multihypothesiscomparisonoffarquharandcollatzphotosynthesismodelsrevealstheunexpectedinfluenceofempiricalassumptionsatleafandglobalscales
AT bridgesroberta multihypothesiscomparisonoffarquharandcollatzphotosynthesismodelsrevealstheunexpectedinfluenceofempiricalassumptionsatleafandglobalscales
AT fisherrosiea multihypothesiscomparisonoffarquharandcollatzphotosynthesismodelsrevealstheunexpectedinfluenceofempiricalassumptionsatleafandglobalscales
AT ludan multihypothesiscomparisonoffarquharandcollatzphotosynthesismodelsrevealstheunexpectedinfluenceofempiricalassumptionsatleafandglobalscales
AT ricciutodanielm multihypothesiscomparisonoffarquharandcollatzphotosynthesismodelsrevealstheunexpectedinfluenceofempiricalassumptionsatleafandglobalscales
AT serbinshawnp multihypothesiscomparisonoffarquharandcollatzphotosynthesismodelsrevealstheunexpectedinfluenceofempiricalassumptionsatleafandglobalscales
AT yeming multihypothesiscomparisonoffarquharandcollatzphotosynthesismodelsrevealstheunexpectedinfluenceofempiricalassumptionsatleafandglobalscales