Cargando…

A framework for defining FLASH dose rate for pencil beam scanning

PURPOSE: To develop a method of (a) calculating the dose rate of voxels within a proton field delivered using pencil beam scanning (PBS), and (b) reporting a representative dose rate for the PBS treatment field that enables correspondence between multiple treatment modalities. This method takes into...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Folkerts, Michael M., Abel, Eric, Busold, Simon, Perez, Jessica Rika, Krishnamurthi, Vidhya, Ling, C. Clifton
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7894358/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32910460
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mp.14456
_version_ 1783653234774114304
author Folkerts, Michael M.
Abel, Eric
Busold, Simon
Perez, Jessica Rika
Krishnamurthi, Vidhya
Ling, C. Clifton
author_facet Folkerts, Michael M.
Abel, Eric
Busold, Simon
Perez, Jessica Rika
Krishnamurthi, Vidhya
Ling, C. Clifton
author_sort Folkerts, Michael M.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To develop a method of (a) calculating the dose rate of voxels within a proton field delivered using pencil beam scanning (PBS), and (b) reporting a representative dose rate for the PBS treatment field that enables correspondence between multiple treatment modalities. This method takes into account the unique spatiotemporal delivery patterns of PBS FLASH radiotherapy. METHODS: The dose rate at each voxel of a PBS radiation field is approximately the quotient of the voxel’s dose and “effective” irradiation time. Each voxel’s “effective” irradiation time starts when the cumulative dose rises above a chosen threshold value, and stops when its cumulative dose reaches its total dose minus the same threshold value. The above calculation yields a distribution of dose rates for the voxels within a PBS treatment field. To report a representative dose rate for the PBS field, we propose a user‐selectable parameter of pth percentile of the dose rate distribution, such that (100 − p) % of the field is above the corresponding dose rate. To demonstrate the method described above, we design FLASH transmission fields using 250 MeV protons and calculate the PBS dose rate distributions in both two‐dimensional (2D) and three‐dimensional (3D) models. To further evaluate the formalism, we provide an example of a clinical PBS treatment field. RESULTS: With the 2D PBS transmission field, it is demonstrated that the time to accumulate the total dose at a voxel is limited to a fraction of the delivery time of the entire field. In addition, the spatial distributions of dose and dose rate are quite different within the field. For the 10 × 10 cm(2) PBS field irradiating a 3D water phantom, the prescribed dose of 10 Gy at 10 cm depth is delivered in 1.0 s. The dose rate decreases in the irradiated volume with increasing depth (until the Bragg peak) due to increase of beam spot size by Coulomb scattering. For example, 95% of the irradiated volume between 0 and 10 cm depth receive >40 Gy/s, whereas between 0–20 cm and 0–30 cm depth, 95% of the irradiated volume received >36 Gy/s and >24 Gy/s, respectively. For the clinical PBS treatment field, the scanning pattern conforms to the PTV. PBS dose rate data are presented for the PTV and adjacent normal organs. CONCLUSION: We have developed a method of calculating the dose rate distribution of a PBS proton field and have recommended nomenclature for reporting PBS treatment dose rate. We believe that standardizing the method for calculating and reporting PBS treatment dose rates, in a manner that corresponds with other treatment modalities, will advance the research and potential application of PBS FLASH radiotherapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7894358
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78943582021-03-02 A framework for defining FLASH dose rate for pencil beam scanning Folkerts, Michael M. Abel, Eric Busold, Simon Perez, Jessica Rika Krishnamurthi, Vidhya Ling, C. Clifton Med Phys EMERGING IMAGING AND THERAPY MODALITIES PURPOSE: To develop a method of (a) calculating the dose rate of voxels within a proton field delivered using pencil beam scanning (PBS), and (b) reporting a representative dose rate for the PBS treatment field that enables correspondence between multiple treatment modalities. This method takes into account the unique spatiotemporal delivery patterns of PBS FLASH radiotherapy. METHODS: The dose rate at each voxel of a PBS radiation field is approximately the quotient of the voxel’s dose and “effective” irradiation time. Each voxel’s “effective” irradiation time starts when the cumulative dose rises above a chosen threshold value, and stops when its cumulative dose reaches its total dose minus the same threshold value. The above calculation yields a distribution of dose rates for the voxels within a PBS treatment field. To report a representative dose rate for the PBS field, we propose a user‐selectable parameter of pth percentile of the dose rate distribution, such that (100 − p) % of the field is above the corresponding dose rate. To demonstrate the method described above, we design FLASH transmission fields using 250 MeV protons and calculate the PBS dose rate distributions in both two‐dimensional (2D) and three‐dimensional (3D) models. To further evaluate the formalism, we provide an example of a clinical PBS treatment field. RESULTS: With the 2D PBS transmission field, it is demonstrated that the time to accumulate the total dose at a voxel is limited to a fraction of the delivery time of the entire field. In addition, the spatial distributions of dose and dose rate are quite different within the field. For the 10 × 10 cm(2) PBS field irradiating a 3D water phantom, the prescribed dose of 10 Gy at 10 cm depth is delivered in 1.0 s. The dose rate decreases in the irradiated volume with increasing depth (until the Bragg peak) due to increase of beam spot size by Coulomb scattering. For example, 95% of the irradiated volume between 0 and 10 cm depth receive >40 Gy/s, whereas between 0–20 cm and 0–30 cm depth, 95% of the irradiated volume received >36 Gy/s and >24 Gy/s, respectively. For the clinical PBS treatment field, the scanning pattern conforms to the PTV. PBS dose rate data are presented for the PTV and adjacent normal organs. CONCLUSION: We have developed a method of calculating the dose rate distribution of a PBS proton field and have recommended nomenclature for reporting PBS treatment dose rate. We believe that standardizing the method for calculating and reporting PBS treatment dose rates, in a manner that corresponds with other treatment modalities, will advance the research and potential application of PBS FLASH radiotherapy. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-11-15 2020-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7894358/ /pubmed/32910460 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mp.14456 Text en © 2020 Varian Medical Systems, Inc. Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle EMERGING IMAGING AND THERAPY MODALITIES
Folkerts, Michael M.
Abel, Eric
Busold, Simon
Perez, Jessica Rika
Krishnamurthi, Vidhya
Ling, C. Clifton
A framework for defining FLASH dose rate for pencil beam scanning
title A framework for defining FLASH dose rate for pencil beam scanning
title_full A framework for defining FLASH dose rate for pencil beam scanning
title_fullStr A framework for defining FLASH dose rate for pencil beam scanning
title_full_unstemmed A framework for defining FLASH dose rate for pencil beam scanning
title_short A framework for defining FLASH dose rate for pencil beam scanning
title_sort framework for defining flash dose rate for pencil beam scanning
topic EMERGING IMAGING AND THERAPY MODALITIES
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7894358/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32910460
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mp.14456
work_keys_str_mv AT folkertsmichaelm aframeworkfordefiningflashdoserateforpencilbeamscanning
AT abeleric aframeworkfordefiningflashdoserateforpencilbeamscanning
AT busoldsimon aframeworkfordefiningflashdoserateforpencilbeamscanning
AT perezjessicarika aframeworkfordefiningflashdoserateforpencilbeamscanning
AT krishnamurthividhya aframeworkfordefiningflashdoserateforpencilbeamscanning
AT lingcclifton aframeworkfordefiningflashdoserateforpencilbeamscanning
AT folkertsmichaelm frameworkfordefiningflashdoserateforpencilbeamscanning
AT abeleric frameworkfordefiningflashdoserateforpencilbeamscanning
AT busoldsimon frameworkfordefiningflashdoserateforpencilbeamscanning
AT perezjessicarika frameworkfordefiningflashdoserateforpencilbeamscanning
AT krishnamurthividhya frameworkfordefiningflashdoserateforpencilbeamscanning
AT lingcclifton frameworkfordefiningflashdoserateforpencilbeamscanning