Cargando…

The Efficacy of Labral Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: With a greater understanding of the importance of the acetabular labrum in the function of the hip, labral repair is preferred over debridement. However, in some scenarios, preservation or repair of the labrum is not possible, and labral reconstruction procedures have been growing in pop...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Safran, Nathan, Rath, Ehud, Haviv, Barak, Atzmon, Ran, Amar, Eyal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7894601/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33644246
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967120977088
_version_ 1783653286806552576
author Safran, Nathan
Rath, Ehud
Haviv, Barak
Atzmon, Ran
Amar, Eyal
author_facet Safran, Nathan
Rath, Ehud
Haviv, Barak
Atzmon, Ran
Amar, Eyal
author_sort Safran, Nathan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: With a greater understanding of the importance of the acetabular labrum in the function of the hip, labral repair is preferred over debridement. However, in some scenarios, preservation or repair of the labrum is not possible, and labral reconstruction procedures have been growing in popularity as an alternative to labral resection. PURPOSE: To provide an up-to-date analysis of the literature to determine the overall efficacy of labral reconstruction when compared with labral repair or resection. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and MEDLINE databases were searched for literature regarding labral reconstruction in the hip before July 21, 2020. The results were screened and evaluated by 2 reviewers, and a third reviewer resolved any discrepancies. The final studies were evaluated using the MINORS (Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies) score. RESULTS: There were 7 comparative studies that fit the inclusion criteria, with 228 hips from 197 patients. The mean follow-up was 34.6 months, and the mean age of all patients was 38.34 years. There were slightly more female patients than male patients (105 vs 92). Arthroscopic reconstruction was performed in 86% of studies (6/7); open surgical techniques, in 14% (1/7). A variety of grafts was used in the reconstructions. The indications for labral reconstruction and outcome measures varied in these publications. Nine patients were lost follow-up, and 6 patients converted to total hip replacement postlabral reconstruction. The assessment of these comparative studies illustrated statistically equivalent results between labral reconstruction and labral repair. Comparisons of labral reconstruction with labral resection also showed statistically equivalent postoperative patient-reported outcome scores; however, the rates of conversion to total hip arthroplasty were significantly higher in the population undergoing resection. CONCLUSION: The review of current available comparative literature, which consists entirely of level 3 studies, suggests that labral reconstruction does improve postoperative outcomes but does not demonstrate superiority over repair. There may, however, be benefit to performing labral reconstruction over resection owing to the higher rate of conversion to total hip arthroplasty in the labral resection group.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7894601
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78946012021-02-26 The Efficacy of Labral Reconstruction: A Systematic Review Safran, Nathan Rath, Ehud Haviv, Barak Atzmon, Ran Amar, Eyal Orthop J Sports Med Article BACKGROUND: With a greater understanding of the importance of the acetabular labrum in the function of the hip, labral repair is preferred over debridement. However, in some scenarios, preservation or repair of the labrum is not possible, and labral reconstruction procedures have been growing in popularity as an alternative to labral resection. PURPOSE: To provide an up-to-date analysis of the literature to determine the overall efficacy of labral reconstruction when compared with labral repair or resection. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and MEDLINE databases were searched for literature regarding labral reconstruction in the hip before July 21, 2020. The results were screened and evaluated by 2 reviewers, and a third reviewer resolved any discrepancies. The final studies were evaluated using the MINORS (Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies) score. RESULTS: There were 7 comparative studies that fit the inclusion criteria, with 228 hips from 197 patients. The mean follow-up was 34.6 months, and the mean age of all patients was 38.34 years. There were slightly more female patients than male patients (105 vs 92). Arthroscopic reconstruction was performed in 86% of studies (6/7); open surgical techniques, in 14% (1/7). A variety of grafts was used in the reconstructions. The indications for labral reconstruction and outcome measures varied in these publications. Nine patients were lost follow-up, and 6 patients converted to total hip replacement postlabral reconstruction. The assessment of these comparative studies illustrated statistically equivalent results between labral reconstruction and labral repair. Comparisons of labral reconstruction with labral resection also showed statistically equivalent postoperative patient-reported outcome scores; however, the rates of conversion to total hip arthroplasty were significantly higher in the population undergoing resection. CONCLUSION: The review of current available comparative literature, which consists entirely of level 3 studies, suggests that labral reconstruction does improve postoperative outcomes but does not demonstrate superiority over repair. There may, however, be benefit to performing labral reconstruction over resection owing to the higher rate of conversion to total hip arthroplasty in the labral resection group. SAGE Publications 2021-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7894601/ /pubmed/33644246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967120977088 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Safran, Nathan
Rath, Ehud
Haviv, Barak
Atzmon, Ran
Amar, Eyal
The Efficacy of Labral Reconstruction: A Systematic Review
title The Efficacy of Labral Reconstruction: A Systematic Review
title_full The Efficacy of Labral Reconstruction: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr The Efficacy of Labral Reconstruction: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed The Efficacy of Labral Reconstruction: A Systematic Review
title_short The Efficacy of Labral Reconstruction: A Systematic Review
title_sort efficacy of labral reconstruction: a systematic review
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7894601/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33644246
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967120977088
work_keys_str_mv AT safrannathan theefficacyoflabralreconstructionasystematicreview
AT rathehud theefficacyoflabralreconstructionasystematicreview
AT havivbarak theefficacyoflabralreconstructionasystematicreview
AT atzmonran theefficacyoflabralreconstructionasystematicreview
AT amareyal theefficacyoflabralreconstructionasystematicreview
AT safrannathan efficacyoflabralreconstructionasystematicreview
AT rathehud efficacyoflabralreconstructionasystematicreview
AT havivbarak efficacyoflabralreconstructionasystematicreview
AT atzmonran efficacyoflabralreconstructionasystematicreview
AT amareyal efficacyoflabralreconstructionasystematicreview