Cargando…
The Value of Family History in Colorectal Screening Decisions for Oldest Old Geriatric Populations
Introduction: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most common form of cancer affecting both men and women. Extensive screening guidelines have been developed to help reduce the incidence of disease. Currently, United States Preventative Service Task Force guidelines recommend against routine scree...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7894966/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33628681 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.12815 |
_version_ | 1783653338428997632 |
---|---|
author | Miller, David R Averbukh, Leon Virk, Gurjiwan Jafri, Mikram Tadros, Micheal |
author_facet | Miller, David R Averbukh, Leon Virk, Gurjiwan Jafri, Mikram Tadros, Micheal |
author_sort | Miller, David R |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most common form of cancer affecting both men and women. Extensive screening guidelines have been developed to help reduce the incidence of disease. Currently, United States Preventative Service Task Force guidelines recommend against routine screening in those 85 years and older. However, octogenarians and nonagenarians continue to be screened for CRC with no consensus on indications. The aim of this study is to examine family history of CRC as a risk factor and clinical indication for providing screening colonoscopies to the “oldest old” geriatric population, defined as aged 80 years and above. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of a Veterans’ Health Administration database to identify male veterans aged 80 years and older who underwent screening colonoscopy. Subsequently, we examined those who tested positive for CRC with a family history of CRC. Results: Of the 458,224 patients who are 80 years and older in the Veterans Affairs (VA) database, 17.8% underwent a screening colonoscopy; 11.42% of these individuals were further diagnosed with CRC; and 8.89% of those with diagnosed CRC had a documented family history of CRC. Conclusion: Family history should not be used as an inclusionary criterion for CRC screening in the 80 years and above age group as the rate of CRC in these patients with a family history of CRC is significantly lower than that in the younger age groups with a family history of CRC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7894966 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78949662021-02-23 The Value of Family History in Colorectal Screening Decisions for Oldest Old Geriatric Populations Miller, David R Averbukh, Leon Virk, Gurjiwan Jafri, Mikram Tadros, Micheal Cureus Preventive Medicine Introduction: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most common form of cancer affecting both men and women. Extensive screening guidelines have been developed to help reduce the incidence of disease. Currently, United States Preventative Service Task Force guidelines recommend against routine screening in those 85 years and older. However, octogenarians and nonagenarians continue to be screened for CRC with no consensus on indications. The aim of this study is to examine family history of CRC as a risk factor and clinical indication for providing screening colonoscopies to the “oldest old” geriatric population, defined as aged 80 years and above. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of a Veterans’ Health Administration database to identify male veterans aged 80 years and older who underwent screening colonoscopy. Subsequently, we examined those who tested positive for CRC with a family history of CRC. Results: Of the 458,224 patients who are 80 years and older in the Veterans Affairs (VA) database, 17.8% underwent a screening colonoscopy; 11.42% of these individuals were further diagnosed with CRC; and 8.89% of those with diagnosed CRC had a documented family history of CRC. Conclusion: Family history should not be used as an inclusionary criterion for CRC screening in the 80 years and above age group as the rate of CRC in these patients with a family history of CRC is significantly lower than that in the younger age groups with a family history of CRC. Cureus 2021-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7894966/ /pubmed/33628681 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.12815 Text en Copyright © 2021, Miller et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Preventive Medicine Miller, David R Averbukh, Leon Virk, Gurjiwan Jafri, Mikram Tadros, Micheal The Value of Family History in Colorectal Screening Decisions for Oldest Old Geriatric Populations |
title | The Value of Family History in Colorectal Screening Decisions for Oldest Old Geriatric Populations |
title_full | The Value of Family History in Colorectal Screening Decisions for Oldest Old Geriatric Populations |
title_fullStr | The Value of Family History in Colorectal Screening Decisions for Oldest Old Geriatric Populations |
title_full_unstemmed | The Value of Family History in Colorectal Screening Decisions for Oldest Old Geriatric Populations |
title_short | The Value of Family History in Colorectal Screening Decisions for Oldest Old Geriatric Populations |
title_sort | value of family history in colorectal screening decisions for oldest old geriatric populations |
topic | Preventive Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7894966/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33628681 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.12815 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT millerdavidr thevalueoffamilyhistoryincolorectalscreeningdecisionsforoldestoldgeriatricpopulations AT averbukhleon thevalueoffamilyhistoryincolorectalscreeningdecisionsforoldestoldgeriatricpopulations AT virkgurjiwan thevalueoffamilyhistoryincolorectalscreeningdecisionsforoldestoldgeriatricpopulations AT jafrimikram thevalueoffamilyhistoryincolorectalscreeningdecisionsforoldestoldgeriatricpopulations AT tadrosmicheal thevalueoffamilyhistoryincolorectalscreeningdecisionsforoldestoldgeriatricpopulations AT millerdavidr valueoffamilyhistoryincolorectalscreeningdecisionsforoldestoldgeriatricpopulations AT averbukhleon valueoffamilyhistoryincolorectalscreeningdecisionsforoldestoldgeriatricpopulations AT virkgurjiwan valueoffamilyhistoryincolorectalscreeningdecisionsforoldestoldgeriatricpopulations AT jafrimikram valueoffamilyhistoryincolorectalscreeningdecisionsforoldestoldgeriatricpopulations AT tadrosmicheal valueoffamilyhistoryincolorectalscreeningdecisionsforoldestoldgeriatricpopulations |