Cargando…

Efficacy of ultrasound-guided forearm nerve block versus forearm intravenous regional anaesthesia in patients undergoing carpal tunnel release: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Distal upper extremity surgery is commonly performed under regional anaesthesia, including intravenous regional anaesthesia (IVRA) and ultrasound-guided forearm nerve block. This study aimed to investigate if ultrasound-guided forearm nerve block is superior to forearm IVR...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jalil, Hassanin, Polfliet, Florence, Nijs, Kristof, Bruckers, Liesbeth, De Wachter, Gerrit, Callebaut, Ina, Salimans, Lene, Van de Velde, Marc, Stessel, Björn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7895351/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33606754
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246863
_version_ 1783653345724989440
author Jalil, Hassanin
Polfliet, Florence
Nijs, Kristof
Bruckers, Liesbeth
De Wachter, Gerrit
Callebaut, Ina
Salimans, Lene
Van de Velde, Marc
Stessel, Björn
author_facet Jalil, Hassanin
Polfliet, Florence
Nijs, Kristof
Bruckers, Liesbeth
De Wachter, Gerrit
Callebaut, Ina
Salimans, Lene
Van de Velde, Marc
Stessel, Björn
author_sort Jalil, Hassanin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Distal upper extremity surgery is commonly performed under regional anaesthesia, including intravenous regional anaesthesia (IVRA) and ultrasound-guided forearm nerve block. This study aimed to investigate if ultrasound-guided forearm nerve block is superior to forearm IVRA in producing a surgical block in patients undergoing carpal tunnel release. METHODS: In this observer-blinded, randomized controlled superiority trial, 100 patients undergoing carpal tunnel release were randomized to receive ultrasound-guided forearm nerve block (n = 50) or forearm IVRA (n = 50). The primary outcome was anaesthetic efficacy evaluated by classifying the blocks as complete vs incomplete. Complete anaesthesia was defined as total sensory block, incomplete anaesthesia as mild pain requiring more analgesics or need of general anaesthesia. Pain intensity on a numeric rating scale (0–10) was recorded. Surgeon satisfaction with hemostasis, surgical time, and OR stay time were recorded. Patient satisfaction with the quality of the block was assessed at POD 1. RESULTS: In total, 43 (86%) of the forearm nerve blocks were evaluated as complete, compared to 33 (66%) of the forearm IVRA (p = 0.019). After the forearm nerve block, pain intensity was lower at discharge (-1.76 points lower, 95% CI (-2.92, -0.59), p = 0.0006) compared to patients treated with forearm IVRA. No differences in pain experienced at the start of the surgery, during surgery, and at POD1, nor in surgical time or total OR stay were observed between groups. Surgeon (p = 0.0016) and patient satisfaction (p = 0.0023) were slightly higher after forearm nerve block. CONCLUSION: An ultrasound-guided forearm nerve block is superior compared to forearm IVRA in providing a surgical block in patients undergoing carpal tunnel release. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered as NCT03411551.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7895351
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78953512021-03-01 Efficacy of ultrasound-guided forearm nerve block versus forearm intravenous regional anaesthesia in patients undergoing carpal tunnel release: A randomized controlled trial Jalil, Hassanin Polfliet, Florence Nijs, Kristof Bruckers, Liesbeth De Wachter, Gerrit Callebaut, Ina Salimans, Lene Van de Velde, Marc Stessel, Björn PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Distal upper extremity surgery is commonly performed under regional anaesthesia, including intravenous regional anaesthesia (IVRA) and ultrasound-guided forearm nerve block. This study aimed to investigate if ultrasound-guided forearm nerve block is superior to forearm IVRA in producing a surgical block in patients undergoing carpal tunnel release. METHODS: In this observer-blinded, randomized controlled superiority trial, 100 patients undergoing carpal tunnel release were randomized to receive ultrasound-guided forearm nerve block (n = 50) or forearm IVRA (n = 50). The primary outcome was anaesthetic efficacy evaluated by classifying the blocks as complete vs incomplete. Complete anaesthesia was defined as total sensory block, incomplete anaesthesia as mild pain requiring more analgesics or need of general anaesthesia. Pain intensity on a numeric rating scale (0–10) was recorded. Surgeon satisfaction with hemostasis, surgical time, and OR stay time were recorded. Patient satisfaction with the quality of the block was assessed at POD 1. RESULTS: In total, 43 (86%) of the forearm nerve blocks were evaluated as complete, compared to 33 (66%) of the forearm IVRA (p = 0.019). After the forearm nerve block, pain intensity was lower at discharge (-1.76 points lower, 95% CI (-2.92, -0.59), p = 0.0006) compared to patients treated with forearm IVRA. No differences in pain experienced at the start of the surgery, during surgery, and at POD1, nor in surgical time or total OR stay were observed between groups. Surgeon (p = 0.0016) and patient satisfaction (p = 0.0023) were slightly higher after forearm nerve block. CONCLUSION: An ultrasound-guided forearm nerve block is superior compared to forearm IVRA in providing a surgical block in patients undergoing carpal tunnel release. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered as NCT03411551. Public Library of Science 2021-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7895351/ /pubmed/33606754 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246863 Text en © 2021 Jalil et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Jalil, Hassanin
Polfliet, Florence
Nijs, Kristof
Bruckers, Liesbeth
De Wachter, Gerrit
Callebaut, Ina
Salimans, Lene
Van de Velde, Marc
Stessel, Björn
Efficacy of ultrasound-guided forearm nerve block versus forearm intravenous regional anaesthesia in patients undergoing carpal tunnel release: A randomized controlled trial
title Efficacy of ultrasound-guided forearm nerve block versus forearm intravenous regional anaesthesia in patients undergoing carpal tunnel release: A randomized controlled trial
title_full Efficacy of ultrasound-guided forearm nerve block versus forearm intravenous regional anaesthesia in patients undergoing carpal tunnel release: A randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Efficacy of ultrasound-guided forearm nerve block versus forearm intravenous regional anaesthesia in patients undergoing carpal tunnel release: A randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of ultrasound-guided forearm nerve block versus forearm intravenous regional anaesthesia in patients undergoing carpal tunnel release: A randomized controlled trial
title_short Efficacy of ultrasound-guided forearm nerve block versus forearm intravenous regional anaesthesia in patients undergoing carpal tunnel release: A randomized controlled trial
title_sort efficacy of ultrasound-guided forearm nerve block versus forearm intravenous regional anaesthesia in patients undergoing carpal tunnel release: a randomized controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7895351/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33606754
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246863
work_keys_str_mv AT jalilhassanin efficacyofultrasoundguidedforearmnerveblockversusforearmintravenousregionalanaesthesiainpatientsundergoingcarpaltunnelreleasearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT polflietflorence efficacyofultrasoundguidedforearmnerveblockversusforearmintravenousregionalanaesthesiainpatientsundergoingcarpaltunnelreleasearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT nijskristof efficacyofultrasoundguidedforearmnerveblockversusforearmintravenousregionalanaesthesiainpatientsundergoingcarpaltunnelreleasearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bruckersliesbeth efficacyofultrasoundguidedforearmnerveblockversusforearmintravenousregionalanaesthesiainpatientsundergoingcarpaltunnelreleasearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT dewachtergerrit efficacyofultrasoundguidedforearmnerveblockversusforearmintravenousregionalanaesthesiainpatientsundergoingcarpaltunnelreleasearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT callebautina efficacyofultrasoundguidedforearmnerveblockversusforearmintravenousregionalanaesthesiainpatientsundergoingcarpaltunnelreleasearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT salimanslene efficacyofultrasoundguidedforearmnerveblockversusforearmintravenousregionalanaesthesiainpatientsundergoingcarpaltunnelreleasearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vandeveldemarc efficacyofultrasoundguidedforearmnerveblockversusforearmintravenousregionalanaesthesiainpatientsundergoingcarpaltunnelreleasearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT stesselbjorn efficacyofultrasoundguidedforearmnerveblockversusforearmintravenousregionalanaesthesiainpatientsundergoingcarpaltunnelreleasearandomizedcontrolledtrial