Cargando…
Efficacy of ultrasound-guided forearm nerve block versus forearm intravenous regional anaesthesia in patients undergoing carpal tunnel release: A randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Distal upper extremity surgery is commonly performed under regional anaesthesia, including intravenous regional anaesthesia (IVRA) and ultrasound-guided forearm nerve block. This study aimed to investigate if ultrasound-guided forearm nerve block is superior to forearm IVR...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7895351/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33606754 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246863 |
_version_ | 1783653345724989440 |
---|---|
author | Jalil, Hassanin Polfliet, Florence Nijs, Kristof Bruckers, Liesbeth De Wachter, Gerrit Callebaut, Ina Salimans, Lene Van de Velde, Marc Stessel, Björn |
author_facet | Jalil, Hassanin Polfliet, Florence Nijs, Kristof Bruckers, Liesbeth De Wachter, Gerrit Callebaut, Ina Salimans, Lene Van de Velde, Marc Stessel, Björn |
author_sort | Jalil, Hassanin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Distal upper extremity surgery is commonly performed under regional anaesthesia, including intravenous regional anaesthesia (IVRA) and ultrasound-guided forearm nerve block. This study aimed to investigate if ultrasound-guided forearm nerve block is superior to forearm IVRA in producing a surgical block in patients undergoing carpal tunnel release. METHODS: In this observer-blinded, randomized controlled superiority trial, 100 patients undergoing carpal tunnel release were randomized to receive ultrasound-guided forearm nerve block (n = 50) or forearm IVRA (n = 50). The primary outcome was anaesthetic efficacy evaluated by classifying the blocks as complete vs incomplete. Complete anaesthesia was defined as total sensory block, incomplete anaesthesia as mild pain requiring more analgesics or need of general anaesthesia. Pain intensity on a numeric rating scale (0–10) was recorded. Surgeon satisfaction with hemostasis, surgical time, and OR stay time were recorded. Patient satisfaction with the quality of the block was assessed at POD 1. RESULTS: In total, 43 (86%) of the forearm nerve blocks were evaluated as complete, compared to 33 (66%) of the forearm IVRA (p = 0.019). After the forearm nerve block, pain intensity was lower at discharge (-1.76 points lower, 95% CI (-2.92, -0.59), p = 0.0006) compared to patients treated with forearm IVRA. No differences in pain experienced at the start of the surgery, during surgery, and at POD1, nor in surgical time or total OR stay were observed between groups. Surgeon (p = 0.0016) and patient satisfaction (p = 0.0023) were slightly higher after forearm nerve block. CONCLUSION: An ultrasound-guided forearm nerve block is superior compared to forearm IVRA in providing a surgical block in patients undergoing carpal tunnel release. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered as NCT03411551. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7895351 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78953512021-03-01 Efficacy of ultrasound-guided forearm nerve block versus forearm intravenous regional anaesthesia in patients undergoing carpal tunnel release: A randomized controlled trial Jalil, Hassanin Polfliet, Florence Nijs, Kristof Bruckers, Liesbeth De Wachter, Gerrit Callebaut, Ina Salimans, Lene Van de Velde, Marc Stessel, Björn PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Distal upper extremity surgery is commonly performed under regional anaesthesia, including intravenous regional anaesthesia (IVRA) and ultrasound-guided forearm nerve block. This study aimed to investigate if ultrasound-guided forearm nerve block is superior to forearm IVRA in producing a surgical block in patients undergoing carpal tunnel release. METHODS: In this observer-blinded, randomized controlled superiority trial, 100 patients undergoing carpal tunnel release were randomized to receive ultrasound-guided forearm nerve block (n = 50) or forearm IVRA (n = 50). The primary outcome was anaesthetic efficacy evaluated by classifying the blocks as complete vs incomplete. Complete anaesthesia was defined as total sensory block, incomplete anaesthesia as mild pain requiring more analgesics or need of general anaesthesia. Pain intensity on a numeric rating scale (0–10) was recorded. Surgeon satisfaction with hemostasis, surgical time, and OR stay time were recorded. Patient satisfaction with the quality of the block was assessed at POD 1. RESULTS: In total, 43 (86%) of the forearm nerve blocks were evaluated as complete, compared to 33 (66%) of the forearm IVRA (p = 0.019). After the forearm nerve block, pain intensity was lower at discharge (-1.76 points lower, 95% CI (-2.92, -0.59), p = 0.0006) compared to patients treated with forearm IVRA. No differences in pain experienced at the start of the surgery, during surgery, and at POD1, nor in surgical time or total OR stay were observed between groups. Surgeon (p = 0.0016) and patient satisfaction (p = 0.0023) were slightly higher after forearm nerve block. CONCLUSION: An ultrasound-guided forearm nerve block is superior compared to forearm IVRA in providing a surgical block in patients undergoing carpal tunnel release. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered as NCT03411551. Public Library of Science 2021-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7895351/ /pubmed/33606754 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246863 Text en © 2021 Jalil et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Jalil, Hassanin Polfliet, Florence Nijs, Kristof Bruckers, Liesbeth De Wachter, Gerrit Callebaut, Ina Salimans, Lene Van de Velde, Marc Stessel, Björn Efficacy of ultrasound-guided forearm nerve block versus forearm intravenous regional anaesthesia in patients undergoing carpal tunnel release: A randomized controlled trial |
title | Efficacy of ultrasound-guided forearm nerve block versus forearm intravenous regional anaesthesia in patients undergoing carpal tunnel release: A randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Efficacy of ultrasound-guided forearm nerve block versus forearm intravenous regional anaesthesia in patients undergoing carpal tunnel release: A randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Efficacy of ultrasound-guided forearm nerve block versus forearm intravenous regional anaesthesia in patients undergoing carpal tunnel release: A randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy of ultrasound-guided forearm nerve block versus forearm intravenous regional anaesthesia in patients undergoing carpal tunnel release: A randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Efficacy of ultrasound-guided forearm nerve block versus forearm intravenous regional anaesthesia in patients undergoing carpal tunnel release: A randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | efficacy of ultrasound-guided forearm nerve block versus forearm intravenous regional anaesthesia in patients undergoing carpal tunnel release: a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7895351/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33606754 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246863 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jalilhassanin efficacyofultrasoundguidedforearmnerveblockversusforearmintravenousregionalanaesthesiainpatientsundergoingcarpaltunnelreleasearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT polflietflorence efficacyofultrasoundguidedforearmnerveblockversusforearmintravenousregionalanaesthesiainpatientsundergoingcarpaltunnelreleasearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT nijskristof efficacyofultrasoundguidedforearmnerveblockversusforearmintravenousregionalanaesthesiainpatientsundergoingcarpaltunnelreleasearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT bruckersliesbeth efficacyofultrasoundguidedforearmnerveblockversusforearmintravenousregionalanaesthesiainpatientsundergoingcarpaltunnelreleasearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT dewachtergerrit efficacyofultrasoundguidedforearmnerveblockversusforearmintravenousregionalanaesthesiainpatientsundergoingcarpaltunnelreleasearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT callebautina efficacyofultrasoundguidedforearmnerveblockversusforearmintravenousregionalanaesthesiainpatientsundergoingcarpaltunnelreleasearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT salimanslene efficacyofultrasoundguidedforearmnerveblockversusforearmintravenousregionalanaesthesiainpatientsundergoingcarpaltunnelreleasearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vandeveldemarc efficacyofultrasoundguidedforearmnerveblockversusforearmintravenousregionalanaesthesiainpatientsundergoingcarpaltunnelreleasearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT stesselbjorn efficacyofultrasoundguidedforearmnerveblockversusforearmintravenousregionalanaesthesiainpatientsundergoingcarpaltunnelreleasearandomizedcontrolledtrial |