Cargando…

Compressive behaviour of soft contact lenses and its effect on refractive power on the eye and handling off the eye

PURPOSE: To investigate the stress-strain behaviour of 9 soft contact lens materials, that are commonly used in the market, under uniaxial compression loading. METHODS: Seven types of hydrogel and two types of silicone-hydrogel soft contact lens materials were hydrated in phosphate-buffered saline (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shihab, Ahmad H., Eliasy, Ashkan, Lopes, Bernardo T., Wu, Richard, White, Lynn, Jones, Steve, Geraghty, Brendan, Joda, Akram, Elsheikh, Ahmed, Abass, Ahmed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7895393/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33606837
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247194
_version_ 1783653355624595456
author Shihab, Ahmad H.
Eliasy, Ashkan
Lopes, Bernardo T.
Wu, Richard
White, Lynn
Jones, Steve
Geraghty, Brendan
Joda, Akram
Elsheikh, Ahmed
Abass, Ahmed
author_facet Shihab, Ahmad H.
Eliasy, Ashkan
Lopes, Bernardo T.
Wu, Richard
White, Lynn
Jones, Steve
Geraghty, Brendan
Joda, Akram
Elsheikh, Ahmed
Abass, Ahmed
author_sort Shihab, Ahmad H.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To investigate the stress-strain behaviour of 9 soft contact lens materials, that are commonly used in the market, under uniaxial compression loading. METHODS: Seven types of hydrogel and two types of silicone-hydrogel soft contact lens materials were hydrated in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) solution then subjected to uniaxial compression loads. The load rate was set to 16.0 N/min starting with two consecutive initial 5.0 N loading cycles followed by three relaxation periods of 4.0 min within which there were two more 5.0 N loading cycles and eventually, a full loading cycle that stopped at a load of 49.0 N. The load and contraction data obtained experimentally were analysed to derive the stress-strain behaviour. Finite Element (FE) analysis was then utilised to evaluate the performance of soft contact lenses on the human eye and handling lenses off the eye. RESULTS: Unlike tensile tests, all tested materials showed nonlinear behaviour when tested under compression. When fitted to first-order Ogden hyperelastic model, parameter μ was found to be varying in the range 0.12 to 0.74 MPa and material parameter α was found to be varying in the range 8.2 to 20.326 among the nine tested materials. Compression modulus of elasticity was 2.2 times higher than the tensile modulus of elasticity on average. FE simulation with nonlinear Ogden constitutive model showed a limited change (8%~12%) in the optical performance when compared to other material models, however, it predicted higher stress when the lens was simulated under bending during off-eye handling. CONCLUSIONS: Compression tests revealed slightly nonlinear behaviour when materials were strained under compression stress down to 15% ~ 30% of their nominal heights. Considering the physiological compression loading range of 8 mmHg, secant moduli of elasticity were 1.5% to 6.9% higher than the tension moduli of elasticity depending on the material. Tensile-based moduli of elasticity could be used in FE analysis as a step towards simulating the optical performance of soft contact lenses on-eye. However, nonlinear compression-based material models are recommended for FE analysis of soft contact lenses when lens-handling is investigated off-eye.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7895393
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78953932021-03-01 Compressive behaviour of soft contact lenses and its effect on refractive power on the eye and handling off the eye Shihab, Ahmad H. Eliasy, Ashkan Lopes, Bernardo T. Wu, Richard White, Lynn Jones, Steve Geraghty, Brendan Joda, Akram Elsheikh, Ahmed Abass, Ahmed PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: To investigate the stress-strain behaviour of 9 soft contact lens materials, that are commonly used in the market, under uniaxial compression loading. METHODS: Seven types of hydrogel and two types of silicone-hydrogel soft contact lens materials were hydrated in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) solution then subjected to uniaxial compression loads. The load rate was set to 16.0 N/min starting with two consecutive initial 5.0 N loading cycles followed by three relaxation periods of 4.0 min within which there were two more 5.0 N loading cycles and eventually, a full loading cycle that stopped at a load of 49.0 N. The load and contraction data obtained experimentally were analysed to derive the stress-strain behaviour. Finite Element (FE) analysis was then utilised to evaluate the performance of soft contact lenses on the human eye and handling lenses off the eye. RESULTS: Unlike tensile tests, all tested materials showed nonlinear behaviour when tested under compression. When fitted to first-order Ogden hyperelastic model, parameter μ was found to be varying in the range 0.12 to 0.74 MPa and material parameter α was found to be varying in the range 8.2 to 20.326 among the nine tested materials. Compression modulus of elasticity was 2.2 times higher than the tensile modulus of elasticity on average. FE simulation with nonlinear Ogden constitutive model showed a limited change (8%~12%) in the optical performance when compared to other material models, however, it predicted higher stress when the lens was simulated under bending during off-eye handling. CONCLUSIONS: Compression tests revealed slightly nonlinear behaviour when materials were strained under compression stress down to 15% ~ 30% of their nominal heights. Considering the physiological compression loading range of 8 mmHg, secant moduli of elasticity were 1.5% to 6.9% higher than the tension moduli of elasticity depending on the material. Tensile-based moduli of elasticity could be used in FE analysis as a step towards simulating the optical performance of soft contact lenses on-eye. However, nonlinear compression-based material models are recommended for FE analysis of soft contact lenses when lens-handling is investigated off-eye. Public Library of Science 2021-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7895393/ /pubmed/33606837 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247194 Text en © 2021 Shihab et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Shihab, Ahmad H.
Eliasy, Ashkan
Lopes, Bernardo T.
Wu, Richard
White, Lynn
Jones, Steve
Geraghty, Brendan
Joda, Akram
Elsheikh, Ahmed
Abass, Ahmed
Compressive behaviour of soft contact lenses and its effect on refractive power on the eye and handling off the eye
title Compressive behaviour of soft contact lenses and its effect on refractive power on the eye and handling off the eye
title_full Compressive behaviour of soft contact lenses and its effect on refractive power on the eye and handling off the eye
title_fullStr Compressive behaviour of soft contact lenses and its effect on refractive power on the eye and handling off the eye
title_full_unstemmed Compressive behaviour of soft contact lenses and its effect on refractive power on the eye and handling off the eye
title_short Compressive behaviour of soft contact lenses and its effect on refractive power on the eye and handling off the eye
title_sort compressive behaviour of soft contact lenses and its effect on refractive power on the eye and handling off the eye
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7895393/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33606837
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247194
work_keys_str_mv AT shihabahmadh compressivebehaviourofsoftcontactlensesanditseffectonrefractivepowerontheeyeandhandlingofftheeye
AT eliasyashkan compressivebehaviourofsoftcontactlensesanditseffectonrefractivepowerontheeyeandhandlingofftheeye
AT lopesbernardot compressivebehaviourofsoftcontactlensesanditseffectonrefractivepowerontheeyeandhandlingofftheeye
AT wurichard compressivebehaviourofsoftcontactlensesanditseffectonrefractivepowerontheeyeandhandlingofftheeye
AT whitelynn compressivebehaviourofsoftcontactlensesanditseffectonrefractivepowerontheeyeandhandlingofftheeye
AT jonessteve compressivebehaviourofsoftcontactlensesanditseffectonrefractivepowerontheeyeandhandlingofftheeye
AT geraghtybrendan compressivebehaviourofsoftcontactlensesanditseffectonrefractivepowerontheeyeandhandlingofftheeye
AT jodaakram compressivebehaviourofsoftcontactlensesanditseffectonrefractivepowerontheeyeandhandlingofftheeye
AT elsheikhahmed compressivebehaviourofsoftcontactlensesanditseffectonrefractivepowerontheeyeandhandlingofftheeye
AT abassahmed compressivebehaviourofsoftcontactlensesanditseffectonrefractivepowerontheeyeandhandlingofftheeye