Cargando…

Impact of Match Violations on Applicants’ Perceptions and Rankings of Residency Programs

Introduction The National Resident Matching Program (NRMP) requires all Match participants to adhere to a strict code of conduct known as the Match Participation Agreement, yet Match violations continue to occur. We sought to determine how interview experiences, including Match violations, impact ap...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Monir, Reesa L, Michaudet, Kristina, Monir, Joseph G, Rahmanian, Kiarash P, Michaudet, Charlie, Cooper, Lou Ann, Harrell, Heather
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7895534/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33628688
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.12823
_version_ 1783653374207459328
author Monir, Reesa L
Michaudet, Kristina
Monir, Joseph G
Rahmanian, Kiarash P
Michaudet, Charlie
Cooper, Lou Ann
Harrell, Heather
author_facet Monir, Reesa L
Michaudet, Kristina
Monir, Joseph G
Rahmanian, Kiarash P
Michaudet, Charlie
Cooper, Lou Ann
Harrell, Heather
author_sort Monir, Reesa L
collection PubMed
description Introduction The National Resident Matching Program (NRMP) requires all Match participants to adhere to a strict code of conduct known as the Match Participation Agreement, yet Match violations continue to occur. We sought to determine how interview experiences, including Match violations, impact applicants’ perceptions and rankings of residency programs. Methods An electronic survey was sent to all accredited medical school Deans of Student Affairs and Association of American Medical Colleges Student Representatives for distribution to fourth-year medical students. Questions assessed pressures that residency programs placed on applicants during interview season and their impact on applicants. Both quantitative and qualitative data were collected. Results Of the 433 included respondents, 31.2% (n = 135) reported breaches of the NRMP Match Participation Agreement. Of those, 63% (n = 85) had a negative perception of the violating programs, and 37.8% (n = 51) were less likely to rank those programs highly. Violations included asking applicants about the locations of their other interviews (60.3%, n = 261), pressuring applicants to reveal their ranking (24.0%, n = 104), explicitly requesting applicants to reveal their ranking (6.5%, n = 28), asking applicants to provide a commitment before Match day (3.9%, n = 17), and other behavior that was felt to ignore the spirit of the Match (16.4%, n = 71). Implying that applicants would match into a program if they ranked it highly (37.2%, n = 161) was received positively by 65.2% (n = 105) of applicants experiencing this breach, with 42.2% (n = 68) ranking the program more highly. Three major themes impacting applicants’ impressions of residency programs emerged from the qualitative data: interview experience, professionalism, and post-interview communication (PIC). Respondents overwhelmingly agreed that PIC should either be eliminated or that programs should set clear expectations for PIC. Conclusions Match violations continue to occur, despite the NRMP Match Participation Agreement. With the notable exception of communication implying that applicants would match into a program, applicants overwhelmingly view programs that commit these violations negatively and often rank these programs lower as a result.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7895534
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78955342021-02-23 Impact of Match Violations on Applicants’ Perceptions and Rankings of Residency Programs Monir, Reesa L Michaudet, Kristina Monir, Joseph G Rahmanian, Kiarash P Michaudet, Charlie Cooper, Lou Ann Harrell, Heather Cureus Medical Education Introduction The National Resident Matching Program (NRMP) requires all Match participants to adhere to a strict code of conduct known as the Match Participation Agreement, yet Match violations continue to occur. We sought to determine how interview experiences, including Match violations, impact applicants’ perceptions and rankings of residency programs. Methods An electronic survey was sent to all accredited medical school Deans of Student Affairs and Association of American Medical Colleges Student Representatives for distribution to fourth-year medical students. Questions assessed pressures that residency programs placed on applicants during interview season and their impact on applicants. Both quantitative and qualitative data were collected. Results Of the 433 included respondents, 31.2% (n = 135) reported breaches of the NRMP Match Participation Agreement. Of those, 63% (n = 85) had a negative perception of the violating programs, and 37.8% (n = 51) were less likely to rank those programs highly. Violations included asking applicants about the locations of their other interviews (60.3%, n = 261), pressuring applicants to reveal their ranking (24.0%, n = 104), explicitly requesting applicants to reveal their ranking (6.5%, n = 28), asking applicants to provide a commitment before Match day (3.9%, n = 17), and other behavior that was felt to ignore the spirit of the Match (16.4%, n = 71). Implying that applicants would match into a program if they ranked it highly (37.2%, n = 161) was received positively by 65.2% (n = 105) of applicants experiencing this breach, with 42.2% (n = 68) ranking the program more highly. Three major themes impacting applicants’ impressions of residency programs emerged from the qualitative data: interview experience, professionalism, and post-interview communication (PIC). Respondents overwhelmingly agreed that PIC should either be eliminated or that programs should set clear expectations for PIC. Conclusions Match violations continue to occur, despite the NRMP Match Participation Agreement. With the notable exception of communication implying that applicants would match into a program, applicants overwhelmingly view programs that commit these violations negatively and often rank these programs lower as a result. Cureus 2021-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7895534/ /pubmed/33628688 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.12823 Text en Copyright © 2021, Monir et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Medical Education
Monir, Reesa L
Michaudet, Kristina
Monir, Joseph G
Rahmanian, Kiarash P
Michaudet, Charlie
Cooper, Lou Ann
Harrell, Heather
Impact of Match Violations on Applicants’ Perceptions and Rankings of Residency Programs
title Impact of Match Violations on Applicants’ Perceptions and Rankings of Residency Programs
title_full Impact of Match Violations on Applicants’ Perceptions and Rankings of Residency Programs
title_fullStr Impact of Match Violations on Applicants’ Perceptions and Rankings of Residency Programs
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Match Violations on Applicants’ Perceptions and Rankings of Residency Programs
title_short Impact of Match Violations on Applicants’ Perceptions and Rankings of Residency Programs
title_sort impact of match violations on applicants’ perceptions and rankings of residency programs
topic Medical Education
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7895534/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33628688
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.12823
work_keys_str_mv AT monirreesal impactofmatchviolationsonapplicantsperceptionsandrankingsofresidencyprograms
AT michaudetkristina impactofmatchviolationsonapplicantsperceptionsandrankingsofresidencyprograms
AT monirjosephg impactofmatchviolationsonapplicantsperceptionsandrankingsofresidencyprograms
AT rahmaniankiarashp impactofmatchviolationsonapplicantsperceptionsandrankingsofresidencyprograms
AT michaudetcharlie impactofmatchviolationsonapplicantsperceptionsandrankingsofresidencyprograms
AT cooperlouann impactofmatchviolationsonapplicantsperceptionsandrankingsofresidencyprograms
AT harrellheather impactofmatchviolationsonapplicantsperceptionsandrankingsofresidencyprograms