Cargando…

Rate of detection of serrated lesions at colonoscopy in an average-risk population: a meta-analysis of 129,001 individuals

Background and study aims  Serrated lesions are precursors of approximately one-third of colorectal cancers (CRCs). Information on their detection rate was lacking as an important reference for CRC screening. This study was a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the overall detection rat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Junjie, Chan, Paul S.F., Pang, Tiffany W.Y., Choi, Peter, Chen, Xiao, Lok, Veeleah, Zheng, Zhi-Jie, Wong, Martin C.S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2021
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7895666/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33655052
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1333-1776
_version_ 1783653405993992192
author Huang, Junjie
Chan, Paul S.F.
Pang, Tiffany W.Y.
Choi, Peter
Chen, Xiao
Lok, Veeleah
Zheng, Zhi-Jie
Wong, Martin C.S.
author_facet Huang, Junjie
Chan, Paul S.F.
Pang, Tiffany W.Y.
Choi, Peter
Chen, Xiao
Lok, Veeleah
Zheng, Zhi-Jie
Wong, Martin C.S.
author_sort Huang, Junjie
collection PubMed
description Background and study aims  Serrated lesions are precursors of approximately one-third of colorectal cancers (CRCs). Information on their detection rate was lacking as an important reference for CRC screening. This study was a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the overall detection rate for serrated lesions and their subtypes in average-risk populations undergoing CRC screening with colonoscopy. Patient and methods  MEDLINE and Embase were searched to identify population-based studies that reported the detection rate for serrated lesions. Studies on average-risk populations using colonoscopy as a screening tool were included. Metaprop was applied to model within-study variability by binomial distribution, and Freeman-Tukey Double Arcsine Transformation was adopted to stabilise the variances. The detection rate was presented in proportions using random-effects models. Results  In total, 17 studies involving 129,001 average-risk individuals were included. The overall detection rates for serrated lesions (19.0 %, 95 % CI = 15.3 %–23.0 %), sessile serrated polyps (2.5 %, 95 % CI = 1.5 %–3.8 %), and traditional serrated adenomas (0.3 %, 95 % CI = 0.1 %–0.8 %) were estimated. Subgroup analysis indicated a higher detection rate for serrated lesions among males (22.0 %) than females (14.0 %), and Caucasians (25.9 %) than Asians (14.6 %). The detection rate for sessile serrated polyps was also higher among Caucasians (2.9 %) than Asians (0.7 %). Conclusions  This study determined the overall detection rate for serrated lesions and their different subtypes. The pooled detection rate estimates can be used as a reference for establishing CRC screening programs. Future studies may evaluate the independent factors associated with the presence of serrated lesions during colonoscopy to enhance their rate of detection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7895666
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78956662021-03-01 Rate of detection of serrated lesions at colonoscopy in an average-risk population: a meta-analysis of 129,001 individuals Huang, Junjie Chan, Paul S.F. Pang, Tiffany W.Y. Choi, Peter Chen, Xiao Lok, Veeleah Zheng, Zhi-Jie Wong, Martin C.S. Endosc Int Open Background and study aims  Serrated lesions are precursors of approximately one-third of colorectal cancers (CRCs). Information on their detection rate was lacking as an important reference for CRC screening. This study was a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the overall detection rate for serrated lesions and their subtypes in average-risk populations undergoing CRC screening with colonoscopy. Patient and methods  MEDLINE and Embase were searched to identify population-based studies that reported the detection rate for serrated lesions. Studies on average-risk populations using colonoscopy as a screening tool were included. Metaprop was applied to model within-study variability by binomial distribution, and Freeman-Tukey Double Arcsine Transformation was adopted to stabilise the variances. The detection rate was presented in proportions using random-effects models. Results  In total, 17 studies involving 129,001 average-risk individuals were included. The overall detection rates for serrated lesions (19.0 %, 95 % CI = 15.3 %–23.0 %), sessile serrated polyps (2.5 %, 95 % CI = 1.5 %–3.8 %), and traditional serrated adenomas (0.3 %, 95 % CI = 0.1 %–0.8 %) were estimated. Subgroup analysis indicated a higher detection rate for serrated lesions among males (22.0 %) than females (14.0 %), and Caucasians (25.9 %) than Asians (14.6 %). The detection rate for sessile serrated polyps was also higher among Caucasians (2.9 %) than Asians (0.7 %). Conclusions  This study determined the overall detection rate for serrated lesions and their different subtypes. The pooled detection rate estimates can be used as a reference for establishing CRC screening programs. Future studies may evaluate the independent factors associated with the presence of serrated lesions during colonoscopy to enhance their rate of detection. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2021-03 2021-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7895666/ /pubmed/33655052 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1333-1776 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Huang, Junjie
Chan, Paul S.F.
Pang, Tiffany W.Y.
Choi, Peter
Chen, Xiao
Lok, Veeleah
Zheng, Zhi-Jie
Wong, Martin C.S.
Rate of detection of serrated lesions at colonoscopy in an average-risk population: a meta-analysis of 129,001 individuals
title Rate of detection of serrated lesions at colonoscopy in an average-risk population: a meta-analysis of 129,001 individuals
title_full Rate of detection of serrated lesions at colonoscopy in an average-risk population: a meta-analysis of 129,001 individuals
title_fullStr Rate of detection of serrated lesions at colonoscopy in an average-risk population: a meta-analysis of 129,001 individuals
title_full_unstemmed Rate of detection of serrated lesions at colonoscopy in an average-risk population: a meta-analysis of 129,001 individuals
title_short Rate of detection of serrated lesions at colonoscopy in an average-risk population: a meta-analysis of 129,001 individuals
title_sort rate of detection of serrated lesions at colonoscopy in an average-risk population: a meta-analysis of 129,001 individuals
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7895666/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33655052
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1333-1776
work_keys_str_mv AT huangjunjie rateofdetectionofserratedlesionsatcolonoscopyinanaverageriskpopulationametaanalysisof129001individuals
AT chanpaulsf rateofdetectionofserratedlesionsatcolonoscopyinanaverageriskpopulationametaanalysisof129001individuals
AT pangtiffanywy rateofdetectionofserratedlesionsatcolonoscopyinanaverageriskpopulationametaanalysisof129001individuals
AT choipeter rateofdetectionofserratedlesionsatcolonoscopyinanaverageriskpopulationametaanalysisof129001individuals
AT chenxiao rateofdetectionofserratedlesionsatcolonoscopyinanaverageriskpopulationametaanalysisof129001individuals
AT lokveeleah rateofdetectionofserratedlesionsatcolonoscopyinanaverageriskpopulationametaanalysisof129001individuals
AT zhengzhijie rateofdetectionofserratedlesionsatcolonoscopyinanaverageriskpopulationametaanalysisof129001individuals
AT wongmartincs rateofdetectionofserratedlesionsatcolonoscopyinanaverageriskpopulationametaanalysisof129001individuals