Cargando…

Propensity matched analysis of short term oncological and perioperative outcomes following robotic and thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy for carcinoma esophagus- the first Indian experience

Thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy (TLE) for carcinoma esophagus has better short-term outcomes compared to open esophagectomy. The precise role of robot-assisted laparoscopic esophagectomy (RALE) is still evolving. Single center retrospective analysis of TLE and RALE performed for carcinoma esophagu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Balasubramanian, Shankar, Chittawadagi, Bhushan, Misra, Shivanshu, Ramakrishnan, Parthasarathi, Chinnusamy, Palanivelu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer London 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7896161/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33609251
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11701-021-01211-w
_version_ 1783653497078546432
author Balasubramanian, Shankar
Chittawadagi, Bhushan
Misra, Shivanshu
Ramakrishnan, Parthasarathi
Chinnusamy, Palanivelu
author_facet Balasubramanian, Shankar
Chittawadagi, Bhushan
Misra, Shivanshu
Ramakrishnan, Parthasarathi
Chinnusamy, Palanivelu
author_sort Balasubramanian, Shankar
collection PubMed
description Thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy (TLE) for carcinoma esophagus has better short-term outcomes compared to open esophagectomy. The precise role of robot-assisted laparoscopic esophagectomy (RALE) is still evolving. Single center retrospective analysis of TLE and RALE performed for carcinoma esophagus between January 2015 and September 2018. Propensity score matching was done between the groups for age, gender, BMI, ASA grade, tumor location, neoadjuvant therapy, the extent of surgical resection (Ivor Lewis or McKeown’s), histopathological type (squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma), clinical T and N stages. The primary outcome parameter was lymph node yield. Secondary outcome parameters were resection margin status, duration of surgery, blood loss, conversion to open procedure, length of hospital stay, length of ICU stay, complications, 90-day mortality and cost. There were 90 patients in TLE and 25 patients in RALE group. After propensity matching, there were 22 patients in each group. The lymph node yield was similar in both the groups (23.95 ± 8.23 vs 22.73 ± 11.63; p = 0.688). There were no conversions or positive resection margins in either group. RALE was associated with longer operating duration (513.18 ± 91.23 min vs 444.77 ± 64.91 min; p = 0.006) and higher cost ($5271.75 ± 456.46 vs $4243.01 ± 474.64; p < 0.001) than TLE. Both were comparable in terms of blood loss (138.86 ± 31.20 ml vs 133.18 ± 34.80 ml; p = 0.572), Clavien-Dindo grade IIIa and above complications (13.64% vs 9.09%; p = 0.634), hospital stay (12.18 ± 6.35 days vs 12.73 ± 7.83 days; p = 0.801), ICU stay (4.91 ± 5.22 days vs 4.77 ± 4.81 days; p = 0.929) and mortality (0 vs 4.55%; p = 0.235). RALE is comparable to TLE in terms of short-term oncological and perioperative outcomes except for longer operating duration when performed for carcinoma esophagus. RALE is costlier than TLE.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7896161
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer London
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78961612021-02-22 Propensity matched analysis of short term oncological and perioperative outcomes following robotic and thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy for carcinoma esophagus- the first Indian experience Balasubramanian, Shankar Chittawadagi, Bhushan Misra, Shivanshu Ramakrishnan, Parthasarathi Chinnusamy, Palanivelu J Robot Surg Original Article Thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy (TLE) for carcinoma esophagus has better short-term outcomes compared to open esophagectomy. The precise role of robot-assisted laparoscopic esophagectomy (RALE) is still evolving. Single center retrospective analysis of TLE and RALE performed for carcinoma esophagus between January 2015 and September 2018. Propensity score matching was done between the groups for age, gender, BMI, ASA grade, tumor location, neoadjuvant therapy, the extent of surgical resection (Ivor Lewis or McKeown’s), histopathological type (squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma), clinical T and N stages. The primary outcome parameter was lymph node yield. Secondary outcome parameters were resection margin status, duration of surgery, blood loss, conversion to open procedure, length of hospital stay, length of ICU stay, complications, 90-day mortality and cost. There were 90 patients in TLE and 25 patients in RALE group. After propensity matching, there were 22 patients in each group. The lymph node yield was similar in both the groups (23.95 ± 8.23 vs 22.73 ± 11.63; p = 0.688). There were no conversions or positive resection margins in either group. RALE was associated with longer operating duration (513.18 ± 91.23 min vs 444.77 ± 64.91 min; p = 0.006) and higher cost ($5271.75 ± 456.46 vs $4243.01 ± 474.64; p < 0.001) than TLE. Both were comparable in terms of blood loss (138.86 ± 31.20 ml vs 133.18 ± 34.80 ml; p = 0.572), Clavien-Dindo grade IIIa and above complications (13.64% vs 9.09%; p = 0.634), hospital stay (12.18 ± 6.35 days vs 12.73 ± 7.83 days; p = 0.801), ICU stay (4.91 ± 5.22 days vs 4.77 ± 4.81 days; p = 0.929) and mortality (0 vs 4.55%; p = 0.235). RALE is comparable to TLE in terms of short-term oncological and perioperative outcomes except for longer operating duration when performed for carcinoma esophagus. RALE is costlier than TLE. Springer London 2021-02-20 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC7896161/ /pubmed/33609251 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11701-021-01211-w Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd. part of Springer Nature 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Original Article
Balasubramanian, Shankar
Chittawadagi, Bhushan
Misra, Shivanshu
Ramakrishnan, Parthasarathi
Chinnusamy, Palanivelu
Propensity matched analysis of short term oncological and perioperative outcomes following robotic and thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy for carcinoma esophagus- the first Indian experience
title Propensity matched analysis of short term oncological and perioperative outcomes following robotic and thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy for carcinoma esophagus- the first Indian experience
title_full Propensity matched analysis of short term oncological and perioperative outcomes following robotic and thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy for carcinoma esophagus- the first Indian experience
title_fullStr Propensity matched analysis of short term oncological and perioperative outcomes following robotic and thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy for carcinoma esophagus- the first Indian experience
title_full_unstemmed Propensity matched analysis of short term oncological and perioperative outcomes following robotic and thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy for carcinoma esophagus- the first Indian experience
title_short Propensity matched analysis of short term oncological and perioperative outcomes following robotic and thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy for carcinoma esophagus- the first Indian experience
title_sort propensity matched analysis of short term oncological and perioperative outcomes following robotic and thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy for carcinoma esophagus- the first indian experience
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7896161/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33609251
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11701-021-01211-w
work_keys_str_mv AT balasubramanianshankar propensitymatchedanalysisofshorttermoncologicalandperioperativeoutcomesfollowingroboticandthoracolaparoscopicesophagectomyforcarcinomaesophagusthefirstindianexperience
AT chittawadagibhushan propensitymatchedanalysisofshorttermoncologicalandperioperativeoutcomesfollowingroboticandthoracolaparoscopicesophagectomyforcarcinomaesophagusthefirstindianexperience
AT misrashivanshu propensitymatchedanalysisofshorttermoncologicalandperioperativeoutcomesfollowingroboticandthoracolaparoscopicesophagectomyforcarcinomaesophagusthefirstindianexperience
AT ramakrishnanparthasarathi propensitymatchedanalysisofshorttermoncologicalandperioperativeoutcomesfollowingroboticandthoracolaparoscopicesophagectomyforcarcinomaesophagusthefirstindianexperience
AT chinnusamypalanivelu propensitymatchedanalysisofshorttermoncologicalandperioperativeoutcomesfollowingroboticandthoracolaparoscopicesophagectomyforcarcinomaesophagusthefirstindianexperience