Cargando…
Ist eine Impfpflicht gegen das Coronavirus nötig?
The end of the pandemic requires that SARS-CoV-2 vaccines be used. However, vaccination itself can lead to temporary adverse health effects and/or long-term damage. Vaccination initially represents a private good demanded by an individual cost-benefit calculus; however, it also creates positive exte...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7896173/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33642648 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10273-021-2852-2 |
_version_ | 1783653499890827264 |
---|---|
author | Wein, Thomas |
author_facet | Wein, Thomas |
author_sort | Wein, Thomas |
collection | PubMed |
description | The end of the pandemic requires that SARS-CoV-2 vaccines be used. However, vaccination itself can lead to temporary adverse health effects and/or long-term damage. Vaccination initially represents a private good demanded by an individual cost-benefit calculus; however, it also creates positive externalities and thus too few individual incentives to vaccinate. Getting vaccinated is not a dominant rational strategy, neither in the overall population, nor among the old and the young, nor when the long-term costs of the pandemic are taken into account. It is all the more important to “price in” the long-term consequences of a lasting pandemic. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7896173 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78961732021-02-22 Ist eine Impfpflicht gegen das Coronavirus nötig? Wein, Thomas Wirtschaftsdienst Analysen und Berichte The end of the pandemic requires that SARS-CoV-2 vaccines be used. However, vaccination itself can lead to temporary adverse health effects and/or long-term damage. Vaccination initially represents a private good demanded by an individual cost-benefit calculus; however, it also creates positive externalities and thus too few individual incentives to vaccinate. Getting vaccinated is not a dominant rational strategy, neither in the overall population, nor among the old and the young, nor when the long-term costs of the pandemic are taken into account. It is all the more important to “price in” the long-term consequences of a lasting pandemic. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-02-20 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7896173/ /pubmed/33642648 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10273-021-2852-2 Text en © Der/die Autor:in(nen) 2021 Open Access: Dieser Artikel wird unter der Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International Lizenz veröffentlicht (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.de). Open Access wird durch die ZBW — Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft gefördert. |
spellingShingle | Analysen und Berichte Wein, Thomas Ist eine Impfpflicht gegen das Coronavirus nötig? |
title | Ist eine Impfpflicht gegen das Coronavirus nötig? |
title_full | Ist eine Impfpflicht gegen das Coronavirus nötig? |
title_fullStr | Ist eine Impfpflicht gegen das Coronavirus nötig? |
title_full_unstemmed | Ist eine Impfpflicht gegen das Coronavirus nötig? |
title_short | Ist eine Impfpflicht gegen das Coronavirus nötig? |
title_sort | ist eine impfpflicht gegen das coronavirus nötig? |
topic | Analysen und Berichte |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7896173/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33642648 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10273-021-2852-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT weinthomas isteineimpfpflichtgegendascoronavirusnotig |