Cargando…
Introduction of an assessment toolkit associated with increased rate of DLB diagnosis
BACKGROUND: Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) and dementia in Parkinson’s disease (PDD) are recognised to be under-recognised in clinical practice in the UK, with only one third to a half of expected cases diagnosed. We aimed to assess whether clinical diagnostic rates could be increased by the introd...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7896389/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33608039 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13195-021-00786-8 |
_version_ | 1783653533138026496 |
---|---|
author | Surendranathan, A. Kane, J. Bentley, A. Barker, S. McNally, R. Bamford, C. Taylor, J.-P. Thomas, A. McKeith, I. Burn, D. O’Brien, J. T. |
author_facet | Surendranathan, A. Kane, J. Bentley, A. Barker, S. McNally, R. Bamford, C. Taylor, J.-P. Thomas, A. McKeith, I. Burn, D. O’Brien, J. T. |
author_sort | Surendranathan, A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) and dementia in Parkinson’s disease (PDD) are recognised to be under-recognised in clinical practice in the UK, with only one third to a half of expected cases diagnosed. We aimed to assess whether clinical diagnostic rates could be increased by the introduction of a structured assessment toolkit for clinicians. METHODS: We established baseline diagnostic rates for DLB and PDD in four memory clinics and three movement disorder/Parkinson’s disease (PD) clinics in two separate geographical regions in the UK. An assessment toolkit specifically developed to assist with the recognition and diagnosis of DLB and PDD was then introduced to the same clinical teams and diagnostic rates for DLB and PDD were reassessed. For assessing DLB diagnosis, a total of 3820 case notes were reviewed before the introduction of the toolkit, and 2061 case notes reviewed after its introduction. For PDD diagnosis, a total of 1797 case notes were reviewed before the introduction of the toolkit and 3405 case notes after it. Mean values and proportions were analysed using Student’s t test for independent samples and χ(2) test, respectively. RESULTS: DLB was diagnosed in 4.6% of dementia cases prior to the introduction of the toolkit, and 6.2% of dementia cases afterwards, an absolute rise of 1.6%, equal to a 35% increase in the number of DLB cases diagnosed when using the toolkit (χ(2) = 4.2, P = 0.041). The number of PD patients diagnosed with PDD was not found overall to be significantly different when using the toolkit: 9.6% of PD cases before and 8.2% of cases after its introduction (χ(2) = 1.8, P = 0.18), though the ages of PD patients assessed after the toolkit’s introduction were lower (73.9 years vs 80.0 years, t = 19.2, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Introduction of the assessment toolkit was associated with a significant increase in the rate of DLB diagnosis, suggesting that a structured means of assessing symptoms and clinical features associated with DLB can assist clinicians in recognising cases. The assessment toolkit did not alter the overall rate of PDD diagnosis, suggesting that alternate means may be required to improve the rate of diagnosis of dementia in Parkinson’s disease. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7896389 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78963892021-02-22 Introduction of an assessment toolkit associated with increased rate of DLB diagnosis Surendranathan, A. Kane, J. Bentley, A. Barker, S. McNally, R. Bamford, C. Taylor, J.-P. Thomas, A. McKeith, I. Burn, D. O’Brien, J. T. Alzheimers Res Ther Research BACKGROUND: Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) and dementia in Parkinson’s disease (PDD) are recognised to be under-recognised in clinical practice in the UK, with only one third to a half of expected cases diagnosed. We aimed to assess whether clinical diagnostic rates could be increased by the introduction of a structured assessment toolkit for clinicians. METHODS: We established baseline diagnostic rates for DLB and PDD in four memory clinics and three movement disorder/Parkinson’s disease (PD) clinics in two separate geographical regions in the UK. An assessment toolkit specifically developed to assist with the recognition and diagnosis of DLB and PDD was then introduced to the same clinical teams and diagnostic rates for DLB and PDD were reassessed. For assessing DLB diagnosis, a total of 3820 case notes were reviewed before the introduction of the toolkit, and 2061 case notes reviewed after its introduction. For PDD diagnosis, a total of 1797 case notes were reviewed before the introduction of the toolkit and 3405 case notes after it. Mean values and proportions were analysed using Student’s t test for independent samples and χ(2) test, respectively. RESULTS: DLB was diagnosed in 4.6% of dementia cases prior to the introduction of the toolkit, and 6.2% of dementia cases afterwards, an absolute rise of 1.6%, equal to a 35% increase in the number of DLB cases diagnosed when using the toolkit (χ(2) = 4.2, P = 0.041). The number of PD patients diagnosed with PDD was not found overall to be significantly different when using the toolkit: 9.6% of PD cases before and 8.2% of cases after its introduction (χ(2) = 1.8, P = 0.18), though the ages of PD patients assessed after the toolkit’s introduction were lower (73.9 years vs 80.0 years, t = 19.2, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Introduction of the assessment toolkit was associated with a significant increase in the rate of DLB diagnosis, suggesting that a structured means of assessing symptoms and clinical features associated with DLB can assist clinicians in recognising cases. The assessment toolkit did not alter the overall rate of PDD diagnosis, suggesting that alternate means may be required to improve the rate of diagnosis of dementia in Parkinson’s disease. BioMed Central 2021-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7896389/ /pubmed/33608039 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13195-021-00786-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Surendranathan, A. Kane, J. Bentley, A. Barker, S. McNally, R. Bamford, C. Taylor, J.-P. Thomas, A. McKeith, I. Burn, D. O’Brien, J. T. Introduction of an assessment toolkit associated with increased rate of DLB diagnosis |
title | Introduction of an assessment toolkit associated with increased rate of DLB diagnosis |
title_full | Introduction of an assessment toolkit associated with increased rate of DLB diagnosis |
title_fullStr | Introduction of an assessment toolkit associated with increased rate of DLB diagnosis |
title_full_unstemmed | Introduction of an assessment toolkit associated with increased rate of DLB diagnosis |
title_short | Introduction of an assessment toolkit associated with increased rate of DLB diagnosis |
title_sort | introduction of an assessment toolkit associated with increased rate of dlb diagnosis |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7896389/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33608039 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13195-021-00786-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT surendranathana introductionofanassessmenttoolkitassociatedwithincreasedrateofdlbdiagnosis AT kanej introductionofanassessmenttoolkitassociatedwithincreasedrateofdlbdiagnosis AT bentleya introductionofanassessmenttoolkitassociatedwithincreasedrateofdlbdiagnosis AT barkers introductionofanassessmenttoolkitassociatedwithincreasedrateofdlbdiagnosis AT mcnallyr introductionofanassessmenttoolkitassociatedwithincreasedrateofdlbdiagnosis AT bamfordc introductionofanassessmenttoolkitassociatedwithincreasedrateofdlbdiagnosis AT taylorjp introductionofanassessmenttoolkitassociatedwithincreasedrateofdlbdiagnosis AT thomasa introductionofanassessmenttoolkitassociatedwithincreasedrateofdlbdiagnosis AT mckeithi introductionofanassessmenttoolkitassociatedwithincreasedrateofdlbdiagnosis AT burnd introductionofanassessmenttoolkitassociatedwithincreasedrateofdlbdiagnosis AT obrienjt introductionofanassessmenttoolkitassociatedwithincreasedrateofdlbdiagnosis |