Cargando…

Analgesic efficacy and safety of erector spinae plane block in breast cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Surgical resection is considered to be the primary and most effective therapy for breast cancer, postoperative pain is an issue gaining significant attention. In recent years, erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has attracted much attention in postoperative analgesia, but its effectiveness...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Ying, Liu, Tieshuai, Zhou, Youfa, Yu, Yijin, Chen, Gang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7896394/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33610172
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-021-01277-x
_version_ 1783653534054481920
author Zhang, Ying
Liu, Tieshuai
Zhou, Youfa
Yu, Yijin
Chen, Gang
author_facet Zhang, Ying
Liu, Tieshuai
Zhou, Youfa
Yu, Yijin
Chen, Gang
author_sort Zhang, Ying
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Surgical resection is considered to be the primary and most effective therapy for breast cancer, postoperative pain is an issue gaining significant attention. In recent years, erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has attracted much attention in postoperative analgesia, but its effectiveness is still controversial. This meta-analysis was implemented to verify the clinical analgesic efficacy and safety of erector spinae plane block in patients undergoing breast cancer surgery. METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrials.gov for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing ESPB with general anesthesia (GA) in breast cancer surgery that were published before December 25, 2020. The primary outcome was opioid consumption at the first 24 h after surgery, while secondary outcomes included pain scores at 1, 6,12 and 24 h after surgery, opioid consumption at 1, 6 and 12 h after surgery, intraoperative opioid consumption, number of patients who need for rescue analgesia, and the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). RESULTS: Eleven randomized controlled trials involving 679 patients met the study inclusion criteria and were included in this study. In comparison to GA group, the ESPB group showed a significant reduction in morphine consumption at the first 24 h after surgery by a mean difference (MD) of − 7.67 mg [95% confidence interval (CI) − 10.35 to − 5.00] (P <  0.01). In addition, the ESPB group showed lower pain scores than the GA group in the four time periods (1, 6, 12 and 24 h after surgery). ESPB group significantly reduce the intraoperative consumption of fentanyl, the need for postoperative rescue analgesia, and the incidence of PONV. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound-guided ESPB is an effective approach for reducing morphine consumption and pain intensity within the first 24 h after breast cancer surgery, compared with GA alone. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12871-021-01277-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7896394
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78963942021-02-22 Analgesic efficacy and safety of erector spinae plane block in breast cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis Zhang, Ying Liu, Tieshuai Zhou, Youfa Yu, Yijin Chen, Gang BMC Anesthesiol Research Article BACKGROUND: Surgical resection is considered to be the primary and most effective therapy for breast cancer, postoperative pain is an issue gaining significant attention. In recent years, erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has attracted much attention in postoperative analgesia, but its effectiveness is still controversial. This meta-analysis was implemented to verify the clinical analgesic efficacy and safety of erector spinae plane block in patients undergoing breast cancer surgery. METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrials.gov for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing ESPB with general anesthesia (GA) in breast cancer surgery that were published before December 25, 2020. The primary outcome was opioid consumption at the first 24 h after surgery, while secondary outcomes included pain scores at 1, 6,12 and 24 h after surgery, opioid consumption at 1, 6 and 12 h after surgery, intraoperative opioid consumption, number of patients who need for rescue analgesia, and the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). RESULTS: Eleven randomized controlled trials involving 679 patients met the study inclusion criteria and were included in this study. In comparison to GA group, the ESPB group showed a significant reduction in morphine consumption at the first 24 h after surgery by a mean difference (MD) of − 7.67 mg [95% confidence interval (CI) − 10.35 to − 5.00] (P <  0.01). In addition, the ESPB group showed lower pain scores than the GA group in the four time periods (1, 6, 12 and 24 h after surgery). ESPB group significantly reduce the intraoperative consumption of fentanyl, the need for postoperative rescue analgesia, and the incidence of PONV. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound-guided ESPB is an effective approach for reducing morphine consumption and pain intensity within the first 24 h after breast cancer surgery, compared with GA alone. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12871-021-01277-x. BioMed Central 2021-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7896394/ /pubmed/33610172 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-021-01277-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhang, Ying
Liu, Tieshuai
Zhou, Youfa
Yu, Yijin
Chen, Gang
Analgesic efficacy and safety of erector spinae plane block in breast cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Analgesic efficacy and safety of erector spinae plane block in breast cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Analgesic efficacy and safety of erector spinae plane block in breast cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Analgesic efficacy and safety of erector spinae plane block in breast cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Analgesic efficacy and safety of erector spinae plane block in breast cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Analgesic efficacy and safety of erector spinae plane block in breast cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort analgesic efficacy and safety of erector spinae plane block in breast cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7896394/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33610172
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-021-01277-x
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangying analgesicefficacyandsafetyoferectorspinaeplaneblockinbreastcancersurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liutieshuai analgesicefficacyandsafetyoferectorspinaeplaneblockinbreastcancersurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhouyoufa analgesicefficacyandsafetyoferectorspinaeplaneblockinbreastcancersurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yuyijin analgesicefficacyandsafetyoferectorspinaeplaneblockinbreastcancersurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chengang analgesicefficacyandsafetyoferectorspinaeplaneblockinbreastcancersurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis