Cargando…

Cognitive measures during walking with and without lower-limb prosthesis: protocol for a scoping review

INTRODUCTION: Tuning of lower-limb (LL) robotic prosthesis control is necessary to provide personalised assistance to each human wearer during walking. Prostheses wearers’ adaptation processes are subjective and the efficiency largely depends on one’s mental processes. Therefore, beyond physical mot...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yuan, Jing, Cline, Emily, Liu, Ming, Huang, He, Feng, Jing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7896605/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33602700
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039975
_version_ 1783653572982865920
author Yuan, Jing
Cline, Emily
Liu, Ming
Huang, He
Feng, Jing
author_facet Yuan, Jing
Cline, Emily
Liu, Ming
Huang, He
Feng, Jing
author_sort Yuan, Jing
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Tuning of lower-limb (LL) robotic prosthesis control is necessary to provide personalised assistance to each human wearer during walking. Prostheses wearers’ adaptation processes are subjective and the efficiency largely depends on one’s mental processes. Therefore, beyond physical motor performance, prosthesis personalisation should consider the wearer’s preference and cognitive performance during walking. As a first step, it is necessary to examine the current measures of cognitive performance when a wearer walks with an LL prosthesis, identify the gaps and methodological considerations, and explore additional measures in a walking setting. In this protocol, we outlined a scoping review that will systematically summarise and evaluate the measures of cognitive performance during walking with and without LL prosthesis. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The review process will be guided and documented by CADIMA, an open-access online data management portal for evidence synthesis. Keyword searches will be conducted in seven databases (Web of Science, MEDLINE, BIOSIS, SciELO Citation Index, ProQuest, CINAHL and PsycINFO) up to 2020 supplemented with grey literature searches. Retrieved records will be screened by at least two independent reviewers on the title-and-abstract level and then the full-text level. Selected studies will be evaluated for reporting bias. Data on sample characteristics, type of cognitive function, characteristics of cognitive measures, task prioritisation, experimental design and walking setting will be extracted. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This scoping review will evaluate the measures used in previously published studies thus does not require ethical approval. The results will contribute to the advancement of prosthesis tuning processes by reviewing the application status of cognitive measures during walking with and without prosthesis and laying the foundation for developing needed measures for cognitive assessment during walking. The results will be disseminated through conferences and journals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7896605
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78966052021-03-05 Cognitive measures during walking with and without lower-limb prosthesis: protocol for a scoping review Yuan, Jing Cline, Emily Liu, Ming Huang, He Feng, Jing BMJ Open Research Methods INTRODUCTION: Tuning of lower-limb (LL) robotic prosthesis control is necessary to provide personalised assistance to each human wearer during walking. Prostheses wearers’ adaptation processes are subjective and the efficiency largely depends on one’s mental processes. Therefore, beyond physical motor performance, prosthesis personalisation should consider the wearer’s preference and cognitive performance during walking. As a first step, it is necessary to examine the current measures of cognitive performance when a wearer walks with an LL prosthesis, identify the gaps and methodological considerations, and explore additional measures in a walking setting. In this protocol, we outlined a scoping review that will systematically summarise and evaluate the measures of cognitive performance during walking with and without LL prosthesis. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The review process will be guided and documented by CADIMA, an open-access online data management portal for evidence synthesis. Keyword searches will be conducted in seven databases (Web of Science, MEDLINE, BIOSIS, SciELO Citation Index, ProQuest, CINAHL and PsycINFO) up to 2020 supplemented with grey literature searches. Retrieved records will be screened by at least two independent reviewers on the title-and-abstract level and then the full-text level. Selected studies will be evaluated for reporting bias. Data on sample characteristics, type of cognitive function, characteristics of cognitive measures, task prioritisation, experimental design and walking setting will be extracted. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This scoping review will evaluate the measures used in previously published studies thus does not require ethical approval. The results will contribute to the advancement of prosthesis tuning processes by reviewing the application status of cognitive measures during walking with and without prosthesis and laying the foundation for developing needed measures for cognitive assessment during walking. The results will be disseminated through conferences and journals. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7896605/ /pubmed/33602700 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039975 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research Methods
Yuan, Jing
Cline, Emily
Liu, Ming
Huang, He
Feng, Jing
Cognitive measures during walking with and without lower-limb prosthesis: protocol for a scoping review
title Cognitive measures during walking with and without lower-limb prosthesis: protocol for a scoping review
title_full Cognitive measures during walking with and without lower-limb prosthesis: protocol for a scoping review
title_fullStr Cognitive measures during walking with and without lower-limb prosthesis: protocol for a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Cognitive measures during walking with and without lower-limb prosthesis: protocol for a scoping review
title_short Cognitive measures during walking with and without lower-limb prosthesis: protocol for a scoping review
title_sort cognitive measures during walking with and without lower-limb prosthesis: protocol for a scoping review
topic Research Methods
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7896605/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33602700
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039975
work_keys_str_mv AT yuanjing cognitivemeasuresduringwalkingwithandwithoutlowerlimbprosthesisprotocolforascopingreview
AT clineemily cognitivemeasuresduringwalkingwithandwithoutlowerlimbprosthesisprotocolforascopingreview
AT liuming cognitivemeasuresduringwalkingwithandwithoutlowerlimbprosthesisprotocolforascopingreview
AT huanghe cognitivemeasuresduringwalkingwithandwithoutlowerlimbprosthesisprotocolforascopingreview
AT fengjing cognitivemeasuresduringwalkingwithandwithoutlowerlimbprosthesisprotocolforascopingreview