Cargando…
Suppressing evolution in genetically engineered systems through repeated supplementation
Genetically engineered organisms are prone to evolve in response to the engineering. This evolution is often undesirable and can negatively affect the purpose of the engineering. Methods that maintain the stability of engineered genomes are therefore critical to the successful design and use of gene...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7896713/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33664781 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.13119 |
_version_ | 1783653594948435968 |
---|---|
author | Layman, Nathan C. Tuschhoff, Beth M. Basinski, Andrew J. Remien, Christopher H. Bull, James J. Nuismer, Scott L. |
author_facet | Layman, Nathan C. Tuschhoff, Beth M. Basinski, Andrew J. Remien, Christopher H. Bull, James J. Nuismer, Scott L. |
author_sort | Layman, Nathan C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Genetically engineered organisms are prone to evolve in response to the engineering. This evolution is often undesirable and can negatively affect the purpose of the engineering. Methods that maintain the stability of engineered genomes are therefore critical to the successful design and use of genetically engineered organisms. One potential method to limit unwanted evolution is by taking advantage of the ability of gene flow to counter local adaption, a process of supplementation. Here, we investigate the feasibility of supplementation as a mechanism to offset the evolutionary degradation of a transgene in three model systems: a bioreactor, a gene drive, and a transmissible vaccine. In each model, continual introduction from a stock is used to balance mutation and selection against the transgene. Each system has its unique features. The bioreactor system is especially tractable and has a simple answer: The level of supplementation required to maintain the transgene at a frequency [Formula: see text] is approximately [Formula: see text] , where s is the selective disadvantage of the transgene. Supplementation is also feasible in the transmissible vaccine case but is probably not practical to prevent the evolution of resistance against a gene drive. We note, however, that the continual replacement of even a small fraction of a large population can be challenging, limiting the usefulness of supplementation as a means of controlling unwanted evolution. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7896713 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78967132021-03-03 Suppressing evolution in genetically engineered systems through repeated supplementation Layman, Nathan C. Tuschhoff, Beth M. Basinski, Andrew J. Remien, Christopher H. Bull, James J. Nuismer, Scott L. Evol Appl Original Articles Genetically engineered organisms are prone to evolve in response to the engineering. This evolution is often undesirable and can negatively affect the purpose of the engineering. Methods that maintain the stability of engineered genomes are therefore critical to the successful design and use of genetically engineered organisms. One potential method to limit unwanted evolution is by taking advantage of the ability of gene flow to counter local adaption, a process of supplementation. Here, we investigate the feasibility of supplementation as a mechanism to offset the evolutionary degradation of a transgene in three model systems: a bioreactor, a gene drive, and a transmissible vaccine. In each model, continual introduction from a stock is used to balance mutation and selection against the transgene. Each system has its unique features. The bioreactor system is especially tractable and has a simple answer: The level of supplementation required to maintain the transgene at a frequency [Formula: see text] is approximately [Formula: see text] , where s is the selective disadvantage of the transgene. Supplementation is also feasible in the transmissible vaccine case but is probably not practical to prevent the evolution of resistance against a gene drive. We note, however, that the continual replacement of even a small fraction of a large population can be challenging, limiting the usefulness of supplementation as a means of controlling unwanted evolution. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7896713/ /pubmed/33664781 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.13119 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Evolutionary Applications published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Layman, Nathan C. Tuschhoff, Beth M. Basinski, Andrew J. Remien, Christopher H. Bull, James J. Nuismer, Scott L. Suppressing evolution in genetically engineered systems through repeated supplementation |
title | Suppressing evolution in genetically engineered systems through repeated supplementation |
title_full | Suppressing evolution in genetically engineered systems through repeated supplementation |
title_fullStr | Suppressing evolution in genetically engineered systems through repeated supplementation |
title_full_unstemmed | Suppressing evolution in genetically engineered systems through repeated supplementation |
title_short | Suppressing evolution in genetically engineered systems through repeated supplementation |
title_sort | suppressing evolution in genetically engineered systems through repeated supplementation |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7896713/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33664781 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.13119 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT laymannathanc suppressingevolutioningeneticallyengineeredsystemsthroughrepeatedsupplementation AT tuschhoffbethm suppressingevolutioningeneticallyengineeredsystemsthroughrepeatedsupplementation AT basinskiandrewj suppressingevolutioningeneticallyengineeredsystemsthroughrepeatedsupplementation AT remienchristopherh suppressingevolutioningeneticallyengineeredsystemsthroughrepeatedsupplementation AT bulljamesj suppressingevolutioningeneticallyengineeredsystemsthroughrepeatedsupplementation AT nuismerscottl suppressingevolutioningeneticallyengineeredsystemsthroughrepeatedsupplementation |