Cargando…

Suppressing evolution in genetically engineered systems through repeated supplementation

Genetically engineered organisms are prone to evolve in response to the engineering. This evolution is often undesirable and can negatively affect the purpose of the engineering. Methods that maintain the stability of engineered genomes are therefore critical to the successful design and use of gene...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Layman, Nathan C., Tuschhoff, Beth M., Basinski, Andrew J., Remien, Christopher H., Bull, James J., Nuismer, Scott L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7896713/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33664781
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.13119
_version_ 1783653594948435968
author Layman, Nathan C.
Tuschhoff, Beth M.
Basinski, Andrew J.
Remien, Christopher H.
Bull, James J.
Nuismer, Scott L.
author_facet Layman, Nathan C.
Tuschhoff, Beth M.
Basinski, Andrew J.
Remien, Christopher H.
Bull, James J.
Nuismer, Scott L.
author_sort Layman, Nathan C.
collection PubMed
description Genetically engineered organisms are prone to evolve in response to the engineering. This evolution is often undesirable and can negatively affect the purpose of the engineering. Methods that maintain the stability of engineered genomes are therefore critical to the successful design and use of genetically engineered organisms. One potential method to limit unwanted evolution is by taking advantage of the ability of gene flow to counter local adaption, a process of supplementation. Here, we investigate the feasibility of supplementation as a mechanism to offset the evolutionary degradation of a transgene in three model systems: a bioreactor, a gene drive, and a transmissible vaccine. In each model, continual introduction from a stock is used to balance mutation and selection against the transgene. Each system has its unique features. The bioreactor system is especially tractable and has a simple answer: The level of supplementation required to maintain the transgene at a frequency [Formula: see text] is approximately [Formula: see text] , where s is the selective disadvantage of the transgene. Supplementation is also feasible in the transmissible vaccine case but is probably not practical to prevent the evolution of resistance against a gene drive. We note, however, that the continual replacement of even a small fraction of a large population can be challenging, limiting the usefulness of supplementation as a means of controlling unwanted evolution.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7896713
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78967132021-03-03 Suppressing evolution in genetically engineered systems through repeated supplementation Layman, Nathan C. Tuschhoff, Beth M. Basinski, Andrew J. Remien, Christopher H. Bull, James J. Nuismer, Scott L. Evol Appl Original Articles Genetically engineered organisms are prone to evolve in response to the engineering. This evolution is often undesirable and can negatively affect the purpose of the engineering. Methods that maintain the stability of engineered genomes are therefore critical to the successful design and use of genetically engineered organisms. One potential method to limit unwanted evolution is by taking advantage of the ability of gene flow to counter local adaption, a process of supplementation. Here, we investigate the feasibility of supplementation as a mechanism to offset the evolutionary degradation of a transgene in three model systems: a bioreactor, a gene drive, and a transmissible vaccine. In each model, continual introduction from a stock is used to balance mutation and selection against the transgene. Each system has its unique features. The bioreactor system is especially tractable and has a simple answer: The level of supplementation required to maintain the transgene at a frequency [Formula: see text] is approximately [Formula: see text] , where s is the selective disadvantage of the transgene. Supplementation is also feasible in the transmissible vaccine case but is probably not practical to prevent the evolution of resistance against a gene drive. We note, however, that the continual replacement of even a small fraction of a large population can be challenging, limiting the usefulness of supplementation as a means of controlling unwanted evolution. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7896713/ /pubmed/33664781 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.13119 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Evolutionary Applications published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Layman, Nathan C.
Tuschhoff, Beth M.
Basinski, Andrew J.
Remien, Christopher H.
Bull, James J.
Nuismer, Scott L.
Suppressing evolution in genetically engineered systems through repeated supplementation
title Suppressing evolution in genetically engineered systems through repeated supplementation
title_full Suppressing evolution in genetically engineered systems through repeated supplementation
title_fullStr Suppressing evolution in genetically engineered systems through repeated supplementation
title_full_unstemmed Suppressing evolution in genetically engineered systems through repeated supplementation
title_short Suppressing evolution in genetically engineered systems through repeated supplementation
title_sort suppressing evolution in genetically engineered systems through repeated supplementation
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7896713/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33664781
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.13119
work_keys_str_mv AT laymannathanc suppressingevolutioningeneticallyengineeredsystemsthroughrepeatedsupplementation
AT tuschhoffbethm suppressingevolutioningeneticallyengineeredsystemsthroughrepeatedsupplementation
AT basinskiandrewj suppressingevolutioningeneticallyengineeredsystemsthroughrepeatedsupplementation
AT remienchristopherh suppressingevolutioningeneticallyengineeredsystemsthroughrepeatedsupplementation
AT bulljamesj suppressingevolutioningeneticallyengineeredsystemsthroughrepeatedsupplementation
AT nuismerscottl suppressingevolutioningeneticallyengineeredsystemsthroughrepeatedsupplementation