Cargando…

Predicting Lymph Node Involvement in Borderline Ovarian Tumors with a Quantitative Model and Nomogram: A Retrospective Cohort Study

PURPOSE: This study aimed to establish a predictive model for lymph node involvement (LNI) in patients with borderline ovarian tumor (BOT) using clinicopathological factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We collected clinical data from consecutive patients who underwent lymphadenectomy for BOT between 2001...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Menglei, Zhou, Fangyue, He, Yuan, Tao, Xiang, Hua, Keqin, Ding, Jingxin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7896740/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33623432
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S287509
_version_ 1783653600976699392
author Zhang, Menglei
Zhou, Fangyue
He, Yuan
Tao, Xiang
Hua, Keqin
Ding, Jingxin
author_facet Zhang, Menglei
Zhou, Fangyue
He, Yuan
Tao, Xiang
Hua, Keqin
Ding, Jingxin
author_sort Zhang, Menglei
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study aimed to establish a predictive model for lymph node involvement (LNI) in patients with borderline ovarian tumor (BOT) using clinicopathological factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We collected clinical data from consecutive patients who underwent lymphadenectomy for BOT between 2001 and 2018 and analyzed their clinicopathological features. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify all independent risk factors associated with LNI; these were then incorporated into the prediction model. RESULTS: In total, we included 248 patients with BOT who were undergoing lymphadenectomy. These were divided into a training cohort (n=174) and a validation cohort (n=74). When considering histopathological data, 16 and 5 patients were identified to have LNI in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. Overall, 13.5% (21/156) patients with serous BOT had LNI while 0% (0/92) patients with non-serous BOT had LNI. We identified several predictors of LNI: the largest tumor being ≥ 12.2cm in diameter, the presence of lesions on the ovarian surface, and the presence of pelvic or abdominal lesions. We created a prediction model and nomogram that incorporated these three risk factors for serous BOT. The model achieved good discriminatory abilities of 0.951 and 0.848 when predicting LNI in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. The LNI-predicting nomogram had an area under curve (AUC) of 0.951 and generated well-fitted calibration curves. CONCLUSION: Non-serous BOT may not require lymphadenectomy as part of surgical staging. The individual risk of LNI in patients with serous BOT can be accurately estimated using our prediction model and nomogram. The use of LNI criteria provides a practical way to support the clinician in making an optimal decision relating to surgical scope for patients with BOT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7896740
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78967402021-02-22 Predicting Lymph Node Involvement in Borderline Ovarian Tumors with a Quantitative Model and Nomogram: A Retrospective Cohort Study Zhang, Menglei Zhou, Fangyue He, Yuan Tao, Xiang Hua, Keqin Ding, Jingxin Cancer Manag Res Original Research PURPOSE: This study aimed to establish a predictive model for lymph node involvement (LNI) in patients with borderline ovarian tumor (BOT) using clinicopathological factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We collected clinical data from consecutive patients who underwent lymphadenectomy for BOT between 2001 and 2018 and analyzed their clinicopathological features. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify all independent risk factors associated with LNI; these were then incorporated into the prediction model. RESULTS: In total, we included 248 patients with BOT who were undergoing lymphadenectomy. These were divided into a training cohort (n=174) and a validation cohort (n=74). When considering histopathological data, 16 and 5 patients were identified to have LNI in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. Overall, 13.5% (21/156) patients with serous BOT had LNI while 0% (0/92) patients with non-serous BOT had LNI. We identified several predictors of LNI: the largest tumor being ≥ 12.2cm in diameter, the presence of lesions on the ovarian surface, and the presence of pelvic or abdominal lesions. We created a prediction model and nomogram that incorporated these three risk factors for serous BOT. The model achieved good discriminatory abilities of 0.951 and 0.848 when predicting LNI in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. The LNI-predicting nomogram had an area under curve (AUC) of 0.951 and generated well-fitted calibration curves. CONCLUSION: Non-serous BOT may not require lymphadenectomy as part of surgical staging. The individual risk of LNI in patients with serous BOT can be accurately estimated using our prediction model and nomogram. The use of LNI criteria provides a practical way to support the clinician in making an optimal decision relating to surgical scope for patients with BOT. Dove 2021-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7896740/ /pubmed/33623432 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S287509 Text en © 2021 Zhang et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Zhang, Menglei
Zhou, Fangyue
He, Yuan
Tao, Xiang
Hua, Keqin
Ding, Jingxin
Predicting Lymph Node Involvement in Borderline Ovarian Tumors with a Quantitative Model and Nomogram: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title Predicting Lymph Node Involvement in Borderline Ovarian Tumors with a Quantitative Model and Nomogram: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_full Predicting Lymph Node Involvement in Borderline Ovarian Tumors with a Quantitative Model and Nomogram: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_fullStr Predicting Lymph Node Involvement in Borderline Ovarian Tumors with a Quantitative Model and Nomogram: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_full_unstemmed Predicting Lymph Node Involvement in Borderline Ovarian Tumors with a Quantitative Model and Nomogram: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_short Predicting Lymph Node Involvement in Borderline Ovarian Tumors with a Quantitative Model and Nomogram: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_sort predicting lymph node involvement in borderline ovarian tumors with a quantitative model and nomogram: a retrospective cohort study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7896740/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33623432
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S287509
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangmenglei predictinglymphnodeinvolvementinborderlineovariantumorswithaquantitativemodelandnomogramaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT zhoufangyue predictinglymphnodeinvolvementinborderlineovariantumorswithaquantitativemodelandnomogramaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT heyuan predictinglymphnodeinvolvementinborderlineovariantumorswithaquantitativemodelandnomogramaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT taoxiang predictinglymphnodeinvolvementinborderlineovariantumorswithaquantitativemodelandnomogramaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT huakeqin predictinglymphnodeinvolvementinborderlineovariantumorswithaquantitativemodelandnomogramaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT dingjingxin predictinglymphnodeinvolvementinborderlineovariantumorswithaquantitativemodelandnomogramaretrospectivecohortstudy