Cargando…

Multicenter Evaluation of Time, Operational, and Economic Efficiencies of a New Preloaded Intraocular Lens Delivery System versus Manual Intraocular Lens Delivery

PURPOSE: To evaluate intraoperative intraocular lens (IOL) delivery time and total surgical case time using the UltraSert preloaded delivery system (System U) during routine cataract surgeries and to compare with the manually loaded Monarch delivery system (System M). Physician satisfaction with Sys...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mendicute, Javier, Bascarán, Lucia, Pablo, Luis, Schweitzer, Cédric, Velasque, Laurent, Bouchet, Christine, Martinez, Aldo A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7896803/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33623360
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S263658
_version_ 1783653615029714944
author Mendicute, Javier
Bascarán, Lucia
Pablo, Luis
Schweitzer, Cédric
Velasque, Laurent
Bouchet, Christine
Martinez, Aldo A
author_facet Mendicute, Javier
Bascarán, Lucia
Pablo, Luis
Schweitzer, Cédric
Velasque, Laurent
Bouchet, Christine
Martinez, Aldo A
author_sort Mendicute, Javier
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate intraoperative intraocular lens (IOL) delivery time and total surgical case time using the UltraSert preloaded delivery system (System U) during routine cataract surgeries and to compare with the manually loaded Monarch delivery system (System M). Physician satisfaction with System U was also assessed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this prospective observational study, subjects ≥18 years old underwent cataract surgery in 1 eye and received the AcrySof IQ IOL via the manually loaded System M (n=103) or the AcrySof IQ IOL model AU00T0 via the preloaded System U (n=93). Procedures were digitally recorded by an external camera or by a camera within the operating microscope. Device preparation, IOL delivery, and IOL positioning times were evaluated by 2 independent graders. Pearson χ(2) test or Fisher exact test was used for categorical variables and Student’s t-test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous variables (all tests were 2-sided and performed at a 5% α-level). Physician satisfaction levels were assessed using questionnaires. RESULTS: Lens delivery time was similar for System U and System M (12.9±5.1 and 12.2±6.3 s; P=0.412). Mean device preparation time for System U was significantly shorter compared with System M (30.3±6.6 versus 59.8±31.0 s; P<0.05). This resulted in a significantly shorter total intraoperative time (device preparation + lens delivery) with System U versus System M (43.0±8.6 versus 72.0±32.5 s; P<0.05). Total surgical case time (device preparation + lens delivery + lens positioning and unfolding) was shorter for System U versus System M (56.6±12.6 versus 89.6±34.6 s; P<0.05). Physicians reported greater satisfaction levels with System U compared with other devices. CONCLUSION: Use of the preloaded delivery system (System U) resulted in faster device preparation and reduced total surgical time compared with the manually loaded system (System M). System U was intuitive to use, and physicians preferred it to other devices.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7896803
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78968032021-02-22 Multicenter Evaluation of Time, Operational, and Economic Efficiencies of a New Preloaded Intraocular Lens Delivery System versus Manual Intraocular Lens Delivery Mendicute, Javier Bascarán, Lucia Pablo, Luis Schweitzer, Cédric Velasque, Laurent Bouchet, Christine Martinez, Aldo A Clin Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: To evaluate intraoperative intraocular lens (IOL) delivery time and total surgical case time using the UltraSert preloaded delivery system (System U) during routine cataract surgeries and to compare with the manually loaded Monarch delivery system (System M). Physician satisfaction with System U was also assessed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this prospective observational study, subjects ≥18 years old underwent cataract surgery in 1 eye and received the AcrySof IQ IOL via the manually loaded System M (n=103) or the AcrySof IQ IOL model AU00T0 via the preloaded System U (n=93). Procedures were digitally recorded by an external camera or by a camera within the operating microscope. Device preparation, IOL delivery, and IOL positioning times were evaluated by 2 independent graders. Pearson χ(2) test or Fisher exact test was used for categorical variables and Student’s t-test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous variables (all tests were 2-sided and performed at a 5% α-level). Physician satisfaction levels were assessed using questionnaires. RESULTS: Lens delivery time was similar for System U and System M (12.9±5.1 and 12.2±6.3 s; P=0.412). Mean device preparation time for System U was significantly shorter compared with System M (30.3±6.6 versus 59.8±31.0 s; P<0.05). This resulted in a significantly shorter total intraoperative time (device preparation + lens delivery) with System U versus System M (43.0±8.6 versus 72.0±32.5 s; P<0.05). Total surgical case time (device preparation + lens delivery + lens positioning and unfolding) was shorter for System U versus System M (56.6±12.6 versus 89.6±34.6 s; P<0.05). Physicians reported greater satisfaction levels with System U compared with other devices. CONCLUSION: Use of the preloaded delivery system (System U) resulted in faster device preparation and reduced total surgical time compared with the manually loaded system (System M). System U was intuitive to use, and physicians preferred it to other devices. Dove 2021-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7896803/ /pubmed/33623360 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S263658 Text en © 2021 Mendicute et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Mendicute, Javier
Bascarán, Lucia
Pablo, Luis
Schweitzer, Cédric
Velasque, Laurent
Bouchet, Christine
Martinez, Aldo A
Multicenter Evaluation of Time, Operational, and Economic Efficiencies of a New Preloaded Intraocular Lens Delivery System versus Manual Intraocular Lens Delivery
title Multicenter Evaluation of Time, Operational, and Economic Efficiencies of a New Preloaded Intraocular Lens Delivery System versus Manual Intraocular Lens Delivery
title_full Multicenter Evaluation of Time, Operational, and Economic Efficiencies of a New Preloaded Intraocular Lens Delivery System versus Manual Intraocular Lens Delivery
title_fullStr Multicenter Evaluation of Time, Operational, and Economic Efficiencies of a New Preloaded Intraocular Lens Delivery System versus Manual Intraocular Lens Delivery
title_full_unstemmed Multicenter Evaluation of Time, Operational, and Economic Efficiencies of a New Preloaded Intraocular Lens Delivery System versus Manual Intraocular Lens Delivery
title_short Multicenter Evaluation of Time, Operational, and Economic Efficiencies of a New Preloaded Intraocular Lens Delivery System versus Manual Intraocular Lens Delivery
title_sort multicenter evaluation of time, operational, and economic efficiencies of a new preloaded intraocular lens delivery system versus manual intraocular lens delivery
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7896803/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33623360
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S263658
work_keys_str_mv AT mendicutejavier multicenterevaluationoftimeoperationalandeconomicefficienciesofanewpreloadedintraocularlensdeliverysystemversusmanualintraocularlensdelivery
AT bascaranlucia multicenterevaluationoftimeoperationalandeconomicefficienciesofanewpreloadedintraocularlensdeliverysystemversusmanualintraocularlensdelivery
AT pabloluis multicenterevaluationoftimeoperationalandeconomicefficienciesofanewpreloadedintraocularlensdeliverysystemversusmanualintraocularlensdelivery
AT schweitzercedric multicenterevaluationoftimeoperationalandeconomicefficienciesofanewpreloadedintraocularlensdeliverysystemversusmanualintraocularlensdelivery
AT velasquelaurent multicenterevaluationoftimeoperationalandeconomicefficienciesofanewpreloadedintraocularlensdeliverysystemversusmanualintraocularlensdelivery
AT bouchetchristine multicenterevaluationoftimeoperationalandeconomicefficienciesofanewpreloadedintraocularlensdeliverysystemversusmanualintraocularlensdelivery
AT martinezaldoa multicenterevaluationoftimeoperationalandeconomicefficienciesofanewpreloadedintraocularlensdeliverysystemversusmanualintraocularlensdelivery