Cargando…
Current methods in translational cancer research
Recent developments in pre-clinical screening tools, that more reliably predict the clinical effects and adverse events of candidate therapeutic agents, has ushered in a new era of drug development and screening. However, given the rapid pace with which these models have emerged, the individual meri...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7897192/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32929562 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10555-020-09931-5 |
_version_ | 1783653645071417344 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Michael W. Miljanic, Mihailo Triplett, Todd Ramirez, Craig Aung, Kyaw L. Eckhardt, S. Gail Capasso, Anna |
author_facet | Lee, Michael W. Miljanic, Mihailo Triplett, Todd Ramirez, Craig Aung, Kyaw L. Eckhardt, S. Gail Capasso, Anna |
author_sort | Lee, Michael W. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Recent developments in pre-clinical screening tools, that more reliably predict the clinical effects and adverse events of candidate therapeutic agents, has ushered in a new era of drug development and screening. However, given the rapid pace with which these models have emerged, the individual merits of these translational research tools warrant careful evaluation in order to furnish clinical researchers with appropriate information to conduct pre-clinical screening in an accelerated and rational manner. This review assesses the predictive utility of both well-established and emerging pre-clinical methods in terms of their suitability as a screening platform for treatment response, ability to represent pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic drug properties, and lastly debates the translational limitations and benefits of these models. To this end, we will describe the current literature on cell culture, organoids, in vivo mouse models, and in silico computational approaches. Particular focus will be devoted to discussing gaps and unmet needs in the literature as well as current advancements and innovations achieved in the field, such as co-clinical trials and future avenues for refinement. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7897192 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78971922021-03-05 Current methods in translational cancer research Lee, Michael W. Miljanic, Mihailo Triplett, Todd Ramirez, Craig Aung, Kyaw L. Eckhardt, S. Gail Capasso, Anna Cancer Metastasis Rev Non-Thematic Review Recent developments in pre-clinical screening tools, that more reliably predict the clinical effects and adverse events of candidate therapeutic agents, has ushered in a new era of drug development and screening. However, given the rapid pace with which these models have emerged, the individual merits of these translational research tools warrant careful evaluation in order to furnish clinical researchers with appropriate information to conduct pre-clinical screening in an accelerated and rational manner. This review assesses the predictive utility of both well-established and emerging pre-clinical methods in terms of their suitability as a screening platform for treatment response, ability to represent pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic drug properties, and lastly debates the translational limitations and benefits of these models. To this end, we will describe the current literature on cell culture, organoids, in vivo mouse models, and in silico computational approaches. Particular focus will be devoted to discussing gaps and unmet needs in the literature as well as current advancements and innovations achieved in the field, such as co-clinical trials and future avenues for refinement. Springer US 2020-09-14 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7897192/ /pubmed/32929562 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10555-020-09931-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Non-Thematic Review Lee, Michael W. Miljanic, Mihailo Triplett, Todd Ramirez, Craig Aung, Kyaw L. Eckhardt, S. Gail Capasso, Anna Current methods in translational cancer research |
title | Current methods in translational cancer research |
title_full | Current methods in translational cancer research |
title_fullStr | Current methods in translational cancer research |
title_full_unstemmed | Current methods in translational cancer research |
title_short | Current methods in translational cancer research |
title_sort | current methods in translational cancer research |
topic | Non-Thematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7897192/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32929562 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10555-020-09931-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leemichaelw currentmethodsintranslationalcancerresearch AT miljanicmihailo currentmethodsintranslationalcancerresearch AT tripletttodd currentmethodsintranslationalcancerresearch AT ramirezcraig currentmethodsintranslationalcancerresearch AT aungkyawl currentmethodsintranslationalcancerresearch AT eckhardtsgail currentmethodsintranslationalcancerresearch AT capassoanna currentmethodsintranslationalcancerresearch |