Cargando…

Current methods in translational cancer research

Recent developments in pre-clinical screening tools, that more reliably predict the clinical effects and adverse events of candidate therapeutic agents, has ushered in a new era of drug development and screening. However, given the rapid pace with which these models have emerged, the individual meri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Michael W., Miljanic, Mihailo, Triplett, Todd, Ramirez, Craig, Aung, Kyaw L., Eckhardt, S. Gail, Capasso, Anna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7897192/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32929562
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10555-020-09931-5
_version_ 1783653645071417344
author Lee, Michael W.
Miljanic, Mihailo
Triplett, Todd
Ramirez, Craig
Aung, Kyaw L.
Eckhardt, S. Gail
Capasso, Anna
author_facet Lee, Michael W.
Miljanic, Mihailo
Triplett, Todd
Ramirez, Craig
Aung, Kyaw L.
Eckhardt, S. Gail
Capasso, Anna
author_sort Lee, Michael W.
collection PubMed
description Recent developments in pre-clinical screening tools, that more reliably predict the clinical effects and adverse events of candidate therapeutic agents, has ushered in a new era of drug development and screening. However, given the rapid pace with which these models have emerged, the individual merits of these translational research tools warrant careful evaluation in order to furnish clinical researchers with appropriate information to conduct pre-clinical screening in an accelerated and rational manner. This review assesses the predictive utility of both well-established and emerging pre-clinical methods in terms of their suitability as a screening platform for treatment response, ability to represent pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic drug properties, and lastly debates the translational limitations and benefits of these models. To this end, we will describe the current literature on cell culture, organoids, in vivo mouse models, and in silico computational approaches. Particular focus will be devoted to discussing gaps and unmet needs in the literature as well as current advancements and innovations achieved in the field, such as co-clinical trials and future avenues for refinement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7897192
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78971922021-03-05 Current methods in translational cancer research Lee, Michael W. Miljanic, Mihailo Triplett, Todd Ramirez, Craig Aung, Kyaw L. Eckhardt, S. Gail Capasso, Anna Cancer Metastasis Rev Non-Thematic Review Recent developments in pre-clinical screening tools, that more reliably predict the clinical effects and adverse events of candidate therapeutic agents, has ushered in a new era of drug development and screening. However, given the rapid pace with which these models have emerged, the individual merits of these translational research tools warrant careful evaluation in order to furnish clinical researchers with appropriate information to conduct pre-clinical screening in an accelerated and rational manner. This review assesses the predictive utility of both well-established and emerging pre-clinical methods in terms of their suitability as a screening platform for treatment response, ability to represent pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic drug properties, and lastly debates the translational limitations and benefits of these models. To this end, we will describe the current literature on cell culture, organoids, in vivo mouse models, and in silico computational approaches. Particular focus will be devoted to discussing gaps and unmet needs in the literature as well as current advancements and innovations achieved in the field, such as co-clinical trials and future avenues for refinement. Springer US 2020-09-14 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7897192/ /pubmed/32929562 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10555-020-09931-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Non-Thematic Review
Lee, Michael W.
Miljanic, Mihailo
Triplett, Todd
Ramirez, Craig
Aung, Kyaw L.
Eckhardt, S. Gail
Capasso, Anna
Current methods in translational cancer research
title Current methods in translational cancer research
title_full Current methods in translational cancer research
title_fullStr Current methods in translational cancer research
title_full_unstemmed Current methods in translational cancer research
title_short Current methods in translational cancer research
title_sort current methods in translational cancer research
topic Non-Thematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7897192/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32929562
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10555-020-09931-5
work_keys_str_mv AT leemichaelw currentmethodsintranslationalcancerresearch
AT miljanicmihailo currentmethodsintranslationalcancerresearch
AT tripletttodd currentmethodsintranslationalcancerresearch
AT ramirezcraig currentmethodsintranslationalcancerresearch
AT aungkyawl currentmethodsintranslationalcancerresearch
AT eckhardtsgail currentmethodsintranslationalcancerresearch
AT capassoanna currentmethodsintranslationalcancerresearch