Cargando…

Aristotle’s lobster: the image in the text

The Anatomai, a lost work written by Aristotle, must have contained a collection of various drawings and figures of species as well as their organs. In his texts (mainly the Historia animalium), Aristotle is often referring to the drawings after the description of species. Our study applies the meth...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fürst von Lieven, Alexander, Humar, Marcel, Scholtz, Gerhard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7897620/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33048298
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12064-020-00322-6
_version_ 1783653706030383104
author Fürst von Lieven, Alexander
Humar, Marcel
Scholtz, Gerhard
author_facet Fürst von Lieven, Alexander
Humar, Marcel
Scholtz, Gerhard
author_sort Fürst von Lieven, Alexander
collection PubMed
description The Anatomai, a lost work written by Aristotle, must have contained a collection of various drawings and figures of species as well as their organs. In his texts (mainly the Historia animalium), Aristotle is often referring to the drawings after the description of species. Our study applies the method of the comparative view (‘Vergleichendes Sehen’) to provide an access to and reconstruction of Aristotle’s lost illustrations based on his textual descriptions. As an example, we chose the treatment of the European lobster (Homarus gammarus L., 1758) in the Aristotelian corpus as a case study. First, we analyse the etymology of the Greek term astakós referring to the lobster and provide an overview on the putative synonyms. Second, we confront the textual basis of the description with several questions concerning the degree of abstraction, the relation between text and image, and the spatial orientation of the image. Finally, we present a step-by-step reconstruction of Aristotle’s illustrations of the lobster based on the various passages dealing with its anatomy in the text of the Historia animalium. The problems which arise by a confrontation of the textual basis with hypothetical images are discussed at a more general level. We conclude that this kind of a text-based image reconstruction is only possible if the object described by Aristotle is unambiguously identifiable and still visually accessible.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7897620
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78976202021-03-05 Aristotle’s lobster: the image in the text Fürst von Lieven, Alexander Humar, Marcel Scholtz, Gerhard Theory Biosci Original Article The Anatomai, a lost work written by Aristotle, must have contained a collection of various drawings and figures of species as well as their organs. In his texts (mainly the Historia animalium), Aristotle is often referring to the drawings after the description of species. Our study applies the method of the comparative view (‘Vergleichendes Sehen’) to provide an access to and reconstruction of Aristotle’s lost illustrations based on his textual descriptions. As an example, we chose the treatment of the European lobster (Homarus gammarus L., 1758) in the Aristotelian corpus as a case study. First, we analyse the etymology of the Greek term astakós referring to the lobster and provide an overview on the putative synonyms. Second, we confront the textual basis of the description with several questions concerning the degree of abstraction, the relation between text and image, and the spatial orientation of the image. Finally, we present a step-by-step reconstruction of Aristotle’s illustrations of the lobster based on the various passages dealing with its anatomy in the text of the Historia animalium. The problems which arise by a confrontation of the textual basis with hypothetical images are discussed at a more general level. We conclude that this kind of a text-based image reconstruction is only possible if the object described by Aristotle is unambiguously identifiable and still visually accessible. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-10-13 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7897620/ /pubmed/33048298 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12064-020-00322-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Fürst von Lieven, Alexander
Humar, Marcel
Scholtz, Gerhard
Aristotle’s lobster: the image in the text
title Aristotle’s lobster: the image in the text
title_full Aristotle’s lobster: the image in the text
title_fullStr Aristotle’s lobster: the image in the text
title_full_unstemmed Aristotle’s lobster: the image in the text
title_short Aristotle’s lobster: the image in the text
title_sort aristotle’s lobster: the image in the text
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7897620/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33048298
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12064-020-00322-6
work_keys_str_mv AT furstvonlievenalexander aristotleslobstertheimageinthetext
AT humarmarcel aristotleslobstertheimageinthetext
AT scholtzgerhard aristotleslobstertheimageinthetext